Jump to content

aimaad22

Members
  • Posts

    9000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by aimaad22

  1. Williamson ffs. Doesn't even know where he ball is. Blind sighted the keeper too I think in the process. Shambolic is putting it lightly
  2. The account has like only 52 followers. I think half the people here dont know about it. I just followed it myself.
  3. Wouldn't be a bad option for that price. Although you'd only fear that would stop us from looking for a proper 15-20 goal striker that we need.
  4. aimaad22

    Tom

    Happy birthday! Have a great day
  5. Shirt pulling? They'd be like a dozen bans from each game!
  6. Need to win this considering the upcoming fixtures. Somebody's got to step up, attack wise. Problem is cant think who. Ayoze perhaps, but he cant do it alone, not yet anyway.
  7. What about this rule? Technically he'll have served a two game ban for 7 yellows then
  8. Just one per half man, for the massive screw ups. Should still leave plenty of room for the abuse.
  9. Aye. Give them a review like in tennis or cricket. Still think they could make that a bit clearer. There's a hell of a lot going on at times and its a lot to expect the linesman to consistently pick up on something like that.
  10. Did a quick search and you're right as in its not explicitly stated but the rule now works towards the benefit of the forward, best explained here: "But it was in 2005 that the most radical changes came, and the switch to a law that, 142 years after it was first formulated, at last seems to have got it right. First, it was clarified that a player is offside only if a part of his body with which he is legally able to play the ball is beyond the penultimate defender. That, realistically, is academic, for no linesman can make a snap judgment as to whether, say, it is upper arm or torso he can see protruding beyond the defender, but what the change did was to shift the benefit of any doubt yet further in favour of the forward." http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2010/apr/13/the-question-why-is-offside-law-genius
  11. The offside rule needs work. The attacker is supposed to have the benefit of the doubt but its rare he gets it apart from the freak incidents where the officials completely miss it. The whole interfering with play things needs to be made clearer or gotten rid of altogether. One review per manager per half. Thing technology is sufficiently advance now for this to happen without taking up too much time. It might actually save some also considering the fall out that usually takes place after a controversial decision, players having a go at each other, technical areas out of control, people being sent to the stands etc etc. Retrospective bans for bad tackles and diving.
  12. Are there any decent nufc podcasts out there btw? Found one on TuneinRadio but it began with the guy trying to sing an Eminem song, Im not going anywhere near that again.
  13. Lost Lewandowski and Rues has been injured for most of this term. Got to feel for them. Doesnt explain the way they've been defending though.
  14. is that the series where they are after our bomb? Cant decide whether to watch it or not. Think it'll probably piss me off but if its anything like that GI Joe movie where they have about 4 veiled guys with machine guys watching over the nukes it'll be highly amusing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.