-
Posts
48471 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
68
Everything posted by Dr Gloom
-
defoe would be the ideal and obvious replacement. he'd be a great addition. we could do worse than get him in alongside someone like fatty viduka. then play defoe and one other from viduka, shola and luque.
-
one thing for sure is that we need a couple of strikers sharpish and preferably a couple with pace to burn. at least we've got a manager with a proven track record in the transfer market i'm absolutely gutted for for owen, and us obviously. we're cursed
-
It's Shearer all over again. Sign one of Europe's top strikers, he cattles his knee and is never the same player again. The curse of NUFC strikes again. 151439[/snapback] that's my biggest worry. shearer was never the same player for us after he did his knee ligaments. he lost a good yard of pace and had to change his game completely. it'll be a shame - and just our luck - if the same happens to owen as a result of this.
-
I used to think that you were actually Freddy Shepherd however Ive now come to the conclusion that your actually an aspiring politician and seeing as you havent even answered the first question properly yet then maybe it is for some new 3 lettered named party. You've refused to answer the questions here stating that you havent got time yet you go on that other forum thingy with Pilchard, wacky and the other one and make out that its a Poll we're running? strange, I cant seem to remember ever mentioning the word poll in it, in fact you'd be running a strange sort of howaythtoon type poll with only two respondents (sorry scratch that only Renton). So for the benefit of this thread and those who can be arsed to follow it anymore. And more importantly for the benefit of Renton who I think has been proven to NOT have strange fancy dan views, doesnt think we should give terrorists a cup of tea and slice of cake and hasnt once used a medical degree as a reason why he should now more about Security issues than you. So for those reasons, I'll copy and paste the "POLL" from Howaythetoon onto here so people can get a rough idea of your answers and compare them to what you've been saying. So then, I reckon Mr Leazes will make a fine politician, always ducking the questions and even denying their existence in some strange "what the fucks that???" kind of way! I bow down to you mate, you really are a star, comedy at its best. I think the outcome of this thread (which will be locked in an hour) now stands at RENTON 5 LEAZES NIL 149772[/snapback] Believe it or not, I don't have time. Why do you dispute that people go to work and don't have time ? Almost as blind as your refusal to accept that its OK for Renton to start abusing someone who disagrees with him, but not when he gets a similar reply. I have answered your post on howaythetoon, seeing as you copied an entry from it, along with my reason for not giving all the answers on here. I think this whole thing is amazing. Plainly only rabid left winger do gooders would take such an incredible stance against someone, just because they don't agree with them. I bet you are all holding hands in a circle. And I think a few people on here should get a life. Just remember PP, every bomb that goes off, is a bomb planted by someone who either shouldn't be here, or someone who we lacked the resources or powerful enough legislation to find and/or stop. That is why a bill is going through increasing police powers. Now did anyone answer that when I mentioned it earlier ..... 149802[/snapback] yet you have time to post in 28+ pages of this thread. funny that 150219[/snapback] Are you not capable of posting anything without using smillies. It is Sunday. Are you at work today ? Clueless. 150220[/snapback] i am at work today as a matter of fact. but if you're not, why don't you try answering the questions renton and pp have repeatedly put to you? if you stop ducking questions, you won't look quite as ridiculous as you have so far in this thread. 150221[/snapback] Strange that you think I duck questions and look ridiculous, because I think that others on here duck questions and look ridiculous, especially when they think having medical qualifications make them experts on defence and security. I am not bothered if people with little experience of life, other than things they have read in books, disagree with me. Particularly someone who thinks that increasing police powers to rope in terrorists puts us on the brink of being a police state, who has got to be the biggest idiot - ever. 150227[/snapback] you could end this thread now by answering the questions. it's sunday, you clearly have time judging by the length of some of your other posts today. go on, i dare you
-
I used to think that you were actually Freddy Shepherd however Ive now come to the conclusion that your actually an aspiring politician and seeing as you havent even answered the first question properly yet then maybe it is for some new 3 lettered named party. You've refused to answer the questions here stating that you havent got time yet you go on that other forum thingy with Pilchard, wacky and the other one and make out that its a Poll we're running? strange, I cant seem to remember ever mentioning the word poll in it, in fact you'd be running a strange sort of howaythtoon type poll with only two respondents (sorry scratch that only Renton). So for the benefit of this thread and those who can be arsed to follow it anymore. And more importantly for the benefit of Renton who I think has been proven to NOT have strange fancy dan views, doesnt think we should give terrorists a cup of tea and slice of cake and hasnt once used a medical degree as a reason why he should now more about Security issues than you. So for those reasons, I'll copy and paste the "POLL" from Howaythetoon onto here so people can get a rough idea of your answers and compare them to what you've been saying. So then, I reckon Mr Leazes will make a fine politician, always ducking the questions and even denying their existence in some strange "what the fucks that???" kind of way! I bow down to you mate, you really are a star, comedy at its best. I think the outcome of this thread (which will be locked in an hour) now stands at RENTON 5 LEAZES NIL 149772[/snapback] Believe it or not, I don't have time. Why do you dispute that people go to work and don't have time ? Almost as blind as your refusal to accept that its OK for Renton to start abusing someone who disagrees with him, but not when he gets a similar reply. I have answered your post on howaythetoon, seeing as you copied an entry from it, along with my reason for not giving all the answers on here. I think this whole thing is amazing. Plainly only rabid left winger do gooders would take such an incredible stance against someone, just because they don't agree with them. I bet you are all holding hands in a circle. And I think a few people on here should get a life. Just remember PP, every bomb that goes off, is a bomb planted by someone who either shouldn't be here, or someone who we lacked the resources or powerful enough legislation to find and/or stop. That is why a bill is going through increasing police powers. Now did anyone answer that when I mentioned it earlier ..... 149802[/snapback] yet you have time to post in 28+ pages of this thread. funny that 150219[/snapback] Are you not capable of posting anything without using smillies. It is Sunday. Are you at work today ? Clueless. 150220[/snapback] i am at work today as a matter of fact. but if you're not, why don't you try answering the questions renton and pp have repeatedly put to you? if you stop ducking questions, you won't look quite as ridiculous as you have so far in this thread.
-
I used to think that you were actually Freddy Shepherd however Ive now come to the conclusion that your actually an aspiring politician and seeing as you havent even answered the first question properly yet then maybe it is for some new 3 lettered named party. You've refused to answer the questions here stating that you havent got time yet you go on that other forum thingy with Pilchard, wacky and the other one and make out that its a Poll we're running? strange, I cant seem to remember ever mentioning the word poll in it, in fact you'd be running a strange sort of howaythtoon type poll with only two respondents (sorry scratch that only Renton). So for the benefit of this thread and those who can be arsed to follow it anymore. And more importantly for the benefit of Renton who I think has been proven to NOT have strange fancy dan views, doesnt think we should give terrorists a cup of tea and slice of cake and hasnt once used a medical degree as a reason why he should now more about Security issues than you. So for those reasons, I'll copy and paste the "POLL" from Howaythetoon onto here so people can get a rough idea of your answers and compare them to what you've been saying. So then, I reckon Mr Leazes will make a fine politician, always ducking the questions and even denying their existence in some strange "what the fucks that???" kind of way! I bow down to you mate, you really are a star, comedy at its best. I think the outcome of this thread (which will be locked in an hour) now stands at RENTON 5 LEAZES NIL 149772[/snapback] Believe it or not, I don't have time. Why do you dispute that people go to work and don't have time ? Almost as blind as your refusal to accept that its OK for Renton to start abusing someone who disagrees with him, but not when he gets a similar reply. I have answered your post on howaythetoon, seeing as you copied an entry from it, along with my reason for not giving all the answers on here. I think this whole thing is amazing. Plainly only rabid left winger do gooders would take such an incredible stance against someone, just because they don't agree with them. I bet you are all holding hands in a circle. And I think a few people on here should get a life. Just remember PP, every bomb that goes off, is a bomb planted by someone who either shouldn't be here, or someone who we lacked the resources or powerful enough legislation to find and/or stop. That is why a bill is going through increasing police powers. Now did anyone answer that when I mentioned it earlier ..... 149802[/snapback] yet you have time to post in 28+ pages of this thread. funny that
-
An intelligent post from you, as usual. It's not my fault I was the only person who said Bellamy was a great player when we signed him.... 150028[/snapback]
-
no fucking way is this lad worth £8m. if we pay that we're even bigger mugs than i thought
-
good news. if he wasn't fit it might have been luque leading the line on his own....
-
that's right. you get the occasional muslim leader on newsnight condeming fanaticism and hate preachers, but i don't think it's enough. young kids need to be taught not to be brainwashed by the fundamentalists and the british muslim community must be more proactive in doing so - this course of action would also give less fuel to leazesmag and others of his ilk. what we've done in the middle east is wrong but it's no excuse for young british kids attacking innocent civilians in their own land. these kids must be taught that two wrongs don't make a right and that there aren't a dozen virgins waiting for them if they blow themselves up in the name of jihad. these are not the teachings of the koran and i think it's the religious leaders' duty to make this more clear than they have done. 149074[/snapback] yet another possible reasonable remark ruined by cheap daft jibes. Just like the unprovoked one Alex made towards Pilchard chops. I could equally say, that as you disagree with me that opening the door for more immigration also opens the door for more extremists to slip through, it is then therefore increasing the odds that "young kids would be brainwashed for the fundamentalists", which of course, is a perfectly logical statement whatever you think of "my ilk" or what I think of "your ilk". And if you disagree that we should not have sensible controlled immigration, what is your view on the effects to our already overstretched social services, housing and economy ? 149087[/snapback] it wasn't a personal dig. i don't agree with your point of view, but i understand that you and others that share your beliefs would find it more difficult to argue your case if the uk muslim community made more of an effort to condem the radicals. for every fundamentalist nutcase that migrates to our country, there are scores of honest hardworking people. and believe it or not, the terrorists involved in the 7/7 bombings were british citizens, not bogus asylum seekers. we're talking about second or third generation asian britons here. so i don't see immigration policy as the main cause for concern here. the threat looms from within our own borders from british muslims - closing our borders will not address this. our economic strength is built on our immigration policy. london's economy would probably collapse without the influx of cheap labour from abroad. and (going slightly off topic), london's diversity is, for me, what makes it such an exciting city to live in. i love the way i can go to brick lane for the best curry in the land, or call for a japanese, thai, or vietmenese delivery at any time day or night. our immigration policy, like america, is what makes our country such a vibrant and economically sound place to live.
-
that's right. you get the occasional muslim leader on newsnight condeming fanaticism and hate preachers, but i don't think it's enough. young kids need to be taught not to be brainwashed by the fundamentalists and the british muslim community must be more proactive in doing so - this course of action would also give less fuel to leazesmag and others of his ilk. what we've done in the middle east is wrong but it's no excuse for young british kids attacking innocent civilians in their own land. these kids must be taught that two wrongs don't make a right and that there aren't a dozen virgins waiting for them if they blow themselves up in the name of jihad. these are not the teachings of the koran and i think it's the religious leaders' duty to make this more clear than they have done.
-
do-gooder
-
what a charming story. thanks for sharing it
-
as much as i disagree with leazesmag's view that closing our borders would reduce the number of potential of terrorists attacks in the uk, i do think that the british muslim community should speak out and condem the fundamentalists much more than they have. there are a lot of impressionable young muslims in britain today that see the mess we've created in iraq and afghanistan and feel disenfranchised. muslim leaders and imams need to make sure that that young BRITISH muslims know that it is wrong to blow yourself and others up or fly a plane into a building.
-
cringeworthy tbh. but nothing less than we've come to expect from the fat controller.
-
our defenders are mostly incompetent. our midfield seems to lack balance and depth and the less said about our striking options the better. apart from that, brilliant.
-
please god not lardy john boy hartson.
-
a better player than bowyer i reckon. can he play centrally as well as out wide?
-
i'm glad he's gone. he's been a massive disappointment for us and we can't afford to pay a squad player £50k a week. shame he never reproduced his leeds form for us. now all we ned is for amdy faye to follow him on his way out
-
Best England team of recent years
Dr Gloom replied to Dr Kenneth Noisewater's topic in Newcastle Forum
RB- Neville LB- Pearce CB- Adams CB- Southgate RM- El Macca LM- Sicknote CM- Ince CM- Gazza CF- Sheeeeerar CF- Sheringham Even i remember that and i was only 11 at the time 146590[/snapback] They changed the system half way through the tourney from 4-4-2 to 3-5-2 IIRC. 146623[/snapback] aren't you thinking of italia 90? we need a soopfan smilie i reckon... -
Supporter rapped over house flags
Dr Gloom replied to curry stained pilchard's topic in Newcastle Forum
this is hardly a flagship thread -
having to include roeder and shearer in his backroom staff put him off. shepherd definitely approached him, despite what anal oliver says
-
i'm surprised they're not supporting david hasslehoff tbh http://www.pr-inside.com/right-said...d-cup-r7297.htm
-
so shepherd is deciding that we're ok for centre backs despite roeder wanting a new one? another fine example of his expert chairmanship.