-
Posts
49417 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
69
Everything posted by Dr Gloom
-
where the heck is gemmil these days?
-
ok i suffer from a mild form of ocd now you go
-
go on; you first
-
those beggars that walk up and down the tube stenching the carriage out trying to be all humble and then try and make you feel guilty when you don't give them any money to help fund their crack habit.
-
mine....people who walk slowly. get the fuck out of my way you fuckers. and don't get me started on people who stand on the wrong side of the escalator
-
i bet they didn't make them out of the horrible nylon material all modern kits are made of in those days.
-
...or is it just me? if not, sort it out lads. i've been getting error screen messages all day
-
That's because you pigeon-hole anyone with a different view to you as a 'PC do-gooder'. ....who've clearly been brainwashed by fancy dan lecturers
-
fuck that. i cherish my online anonymity
-
not even on paper?
-
Everybodies met somebody off here, at one time or another, so just ask them. i haven't. well not knowingly anyway.
-
as would poster you'd most like to meet so you could beat them up
-
i'm not. i agree that we lack creativity (don't you remember accusing me of saying as much?) but the creative players we do have (duff, emre) have underachieved while playing for us while others like milner and n'zogbia have been wasted out of position. so basically, we're not doing as well as we should be on paper how long can we keep this up for?
-
i agree with bagio when he says: that's why i think we're underachieving. we're as good if not better than most of the teams above us on paper yet we're lucky to be tenth after playing a brand of football so ugly it makes the wimbledon side of the 80s look like holland side of 74.
-
you know what, fuck it. i'm not dropping it. i'm hungover and in the mood for wasting a bit of my day with a good old pointless online argument you wrote: i said we're better than most of the teams above us on paper so we're underachieving. you accused me of contradiciting myself as i also moan about our lack of creativity by the very same players. looks to me like baggio is making exactly the same points I don't think we are better than most of the teams above us on paper though and neither does Baggio say that. he said and i agree with him. i think we should be doing better than we are mostly because the players are underachieving (they should be doing better on paper ). our attacking players are either injured, not performing, or being played out of position by the manager.
-
you know what, fuck it. i'm not dropping it. i'm hungover and in the mood for wasting a bit of my day with a good old pointless online argument you wrote: i said we're better than most of the teams above us on paper so we're underachieving. you accused me of contradiciting myself as i also moan about our lack of creativity by the very same players. looks to me like baggio is making exactly the same points
-
i agree. i wonder if alex will argue with you for a page and a half of this thread for basically agreeing with my post.
-
i agree. i wonder if alex will argue with you for a page and a half of this thread for basically agreeing with my post.
-
who are you, leazesmag? i'm clearly less of a fan than you because i don't have a season ticket but for the record, i do get to a handful of games per season.
-
jesus mate. re-read what i posted. i really don't think there's anything there to disagree with. fair play if you want to continue this ding dong but i think i'll give it up now. i stand by everything i've said in this thread. i like a moan as good as the next man but i'm making a legitimate point. anyhoo. here it is again
-
no i'm not. my argument is a valid one and backed up by the points above. i'll repeat them to make it easier for you look at the squad on paper and we should be doing better. why? i hear you cry. well, there are a number of coveted players in our squad who have underachieved since they've been at the club - owen, duff and emre to name just three. these our players that clubs above us like blackburn, everton, pompey etc would all be in for if they became available. so on paper, we have players with big reputations. in reality they continue to underaciheve.
-
i would say personally that the duff of 3 seasons ago when he was flying with chelsea was a a far better player than he has been for us so far. ditto for emre when he was a highly rated creative midfielder for inter. both have been massive letdowns for us. the list is endless tbh. who could argue that most of our big signings of the last few years have arrived with big reputations but have underachieved with us compared with their previous clubs? we're talking about players that we've beaten a lot of our rivals to sign here. i remember when we signed players like duff, owen, parker, emre and many more, fans of spurs, everton etc being pretty gutted that they missed out on them to us. but maybe they're all right and these players only come to us for the money, hence the perennial underachivement of highly rated players.