Dr Gloom

I don't doubt there were a few people up for a ruck but lets not pretend the poor little Israeli soldiers had no option but to defend themselves with Mac-10s. The videos are edited for a reason. the israeli soilders reacted, but there is no doubt at all that they were provoked. were the majority of those on board really peace activists? this is an interesting report. most of the idf that landed on the boat were armed with paint ball guns http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=1213...121348851234252 There's 9 dead and many more injured isn't there? Dr Gloom, are you on the wind up? The Israeli army approached peaceful vessels carrying no weapons in international waters, boarded, killed 9 people, injured 60 and kidnapped 600 because they were "provoked"....anyone videoed defending themselves from the illegal attack were "provoking" them and deserved to be shot to death. Undoubtedly this is how some are portraying it, I can't imagine anyone with an ounce of intelligence or integrity (by which i mean people without a vested interest in keeping Israeli relations sweet) going along with it though. no, i'm not on the wind up. as always though there are two sides to this story. i agree that there was an over reaction from the idf but i'm not as quick to condem israel as some others. as far as israel is concerned the blockade needs to exist to stop weapons getting into gaza. remember that hamas wants israel wiped off the face of the planet. opinion in israel is divided but remember that many normal israelis back a two state solution. but putting politics and whether you're for or against israel aside, the point of discussion is how the israeli soldiers acted. i agree they were heavy handed but to say those on the boat came in peace is questionable.

I don't doubt there were a few people up for a ruck but lets not pretend the poor little Israeli soldiers had no option but to defend themselves with Mac-10s. The videos are edited for a reason. the israeli soilders reacted, but there is no doubt at all that they were provoked. were the majority of those on board really peace activists? this is an interesting report. most of the idf that landed on the boat were armed with paint ball guns http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=1213...121348851234252 There's 9 dead and many more injured isn't there? yup, as always the idf reacted with a heavy hand hence the international condemnation. i don't think it was a pre-meditated shooting spree some have made out though. the footage clearly shows the "peace activists" attacking the israeli soldiers. do these guys look like they came in peace? "kill the jews" is hardly a peaceful battle cry is it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUKi1YeBcMw some further reading here - http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/45...Israel_Wave.asp

I don't doubt there were a few people up for a ruck but lets not pretend the poor little Israeli soldiers had no option but to defend themselves with Mac-10s. The videos are edited for a reason. the israeli soilders reacted, but there is no doubt at all that they were provoked. were the majority of those on board really peace activists? this is an interesting report. most of the idf that landed on the boat were armed with paint ball guns http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=1213...121348851234252

"Peace activists" on Mavi Marmara attacking with metal batons http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nRbcwnp-late...player_embedded

i was just wondering. there has been an underwhelming amount of speculation linking us with any players, even crap ones.

never bet against the sourkrauts. even when their squad is average, and it is this time, they're usually there or there abouts

Weapons Found on the Flotilla Ship Mavi Marmara Used by Activists Against IDF Soldiers

tuesday morning lethargy and blues after a big and boozy weekend taking in a wedding in essex. at least this week is only 4 days long

shame. i thought he looked like he was worth a punt. he definitely looks a lot better than best.

friday nights aren't, especially on a bank holiday weekend

mad men

the first series was good i thought - nasty nick, the lesbian guitar player and the scouse dimwit. the people were relatively normal before later series when they only started bring people in depending on how much of a total cunt they were

guy in my office just got the ipad. i wasn't that tempted. now i am. it's awesome

meh

do-gooding loony lefties. all a bunch of fancy dan lecturers

the mail is a god awful rag, probably the worst paper in the country and the triesmen sting was despicable. is it the club's place to ban them from the ground on the back of it and release another ridiculous statement. i'm not sure. i feel like writing a richard littlejohn column whenever i read a statement from one of ashley's cronies - "you couldn't make it up"

i'm sure this is a principled stance taken by the club and not because the mail slagged off ashley at one time or another

off to vegas for a stag do via la to see my brother who lives out there. probably just going to go to the wife's parents' place in mallorca for our summer holiday. thinking of either australia or india in the winter.

scrathc perverts and beardyman would be a good look on the monday

got to agree with those that hate running; it really is the most tedious form of excercise. i get most of my cardio from spinning and short sessions of high intensity interval sprints on the treadmill for 15 minutes at the end of a workout.

You seem clued up on this shit, will pushups help shift my moobs? I'm also doing cardio as well like as I know that will help. pushups will help but might not be enough alone to get the results you want. the best way to decrease body fat is to combine cardio (high intensity interval training is a good option) with the kind of total body training plan i outlined earlier and a sensible calorie deficit - in other words, don't starve yourself but eat around 100-200 calores below your calorie maintenance level.

the suit on the kid man. he looked like me on my first day at oxclose comp

fuck me this is funny. i can't believe that rhyss kid is 17 like

I think thats sort of the point I am mixing it up anyway, various other workouts involved for me but this is the only thing thats got a website and a proper schedule i haven't looked at the plan. is it a total body workout? i trained only upper body for years but it wasn't until i spread the work around legs and back that i got the results i wanted. i basically threw a shitload of money away at the gym for about 3 years doing endless bicep curls and bench press without seeing any gains before i took the time to learn how to train properly. in my opinion, the best routines are built around a small selection of basic compound excercises that work all the major muscle groups in the body and are performed using free weights that work stabiliser muscles, never machines that only focus on isloated muscle groups. do a selection of 6 from this lot 4 or 5 times a week - squat, deadlift, bench press, shoulder press, pull up, bent over row, lunges, dips. do 5 sets of 5, using the heaviest weight you can lift while maintaing correct form. combine that with a sensible nutrition plan and i gurantee you will be amazed at the results. sorry if i'm preaching to the converted. it may be that your plan already looks a lot like this. just always keen to help others avoid wasting the time and money i did before i got in to real training.

push ups will only do so much for your arms. mix them up with chin ups so you work bicep as well as tricep. 100 push ups isn't impossible. trying to get anywhere near 100 push ups done with proper technique and pace - pretty slow in other words - is murder