Jump to content

scoobos

Members
  • Posts

    2037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by scoobos

  1. Yeah good point well made on the other clubs with 3 quality, but most have four and at least the backup is a contender for the shirt. What Fish said really. I reckon we have Krul and no one else is premiership standard , yet we have 3 sub championship ones. I really dont rate anyone but Krul, and he seems to be losing form.
  2. Might not be popular, but I see the F.A as right here. We have 4 keepers, it's the clubs responsibility to maintain 3 decent keepers. We've had 1 decent keeper since harper went, and he's been in the shop window anyway (krul). Ashley really does know fuck all about a football squad.
  3. Late response but yeah howmanheyman, I'm a yorkshire man, a fake geordie ...
  4. Not long before the papers are calling us fickle for turning on the manager after he's won manager of the month.... The Telegraph has also done well with its Newcastle articles this year., quality write up
  5. I don't want him playing anywhere I want him in the box playing off cisse ... it'll never happen though. He looks to have a great finish on him.
  6. Cheers for the link Monroe, I'll hope its on iplayer. Always liked Elliot.
  7. Although has was poor and very much at fault for goals, we could have had krul in last nighþ and we'd still have got a spanking
  8. He didn't seem too happy after that goal. Super cool, or fucked off that he's been bunged on the right?
  9. Pardews fucked in the head, no system change and cisse off for riviere....
  10. Lets hope not. Gouffran hates a bit harsh innit? He is a striker being forced to play left midfield defensively.
  11. single striker, Perez right midfield. Let the Pardewing of Perez begin !
  12. I reckon Fish is dead on. While rivalry is good fun, I have to admit that it can be fucking cringeworthy between Geordies and Mackams at times. It's a fookin game ffs, and despite the old pub tales of an age old rivalry that goes back to Catholicism in Sunderland that's horse shit, my mate was at the 1966 world cup final and geordies and mackams all got together to get there.
  13. Really poor performance It's like Pardew pushed a button to revert again.
  14. Useless cunt is a bit harsh, he's alright as a striker or wide forward, he's been Pardewed.
  15. If you've been at one club all your career and are doing a lampard.
  16. Lumia 1020, very pleased with it and it integrates with apps on my surface perfectly. But fucked off with the call quality, I want to find the person responsible for ridding of external antennas and using stupid internal ones next to wifi transmitters and cut off his balls. Not so smart phones when someones been that stupid and everyones followed. was the nokia 1 cm stub that offensive?
  17. Ok, I'm not so sure about that one to be honest, we dont understand enough about the human brain to be able to code it. Sure we can have intelligent robots but self awareness is a bit silly I reckon, these two blokes have spent too long working with the us department of defence. 100 years maybe. As far as the ghcq stuff goes, according to the info on wikileaks they have the computational power to search packets in real time and the storage to keep 7 days of data, if that's true, and I doubt it isnt if its on wikileaks, then they could well search whatever they like. It's getting a bit out of hand if you ask me, internet technology has exploded at a rate that is unmanageable and it's becoming increasingly difficult to defend our right to privacy, when our children are being conditioned to share everything with anyone. Very dangerous in my opinion. Back on topic, offshoring data to India might be a worry, but what about selling our telecommunications backbone and nuclear power to the chinese, that's pure stupidity.
  18. cheers for the link, seems in line with my thoughts also. One thing is inaccurate though, which is that ghcq cannot use the information they gather because it is too large, wikileaks exposed that, they have a absolutely massive farm that performs automated searches of raw captured packets. This stuff bothers me, they should only be able to inspect someones packets with a warrant, its like opening and reading every single item of post that goes to every house in the country. Back on with my tinfoil hat now.
  19. Jammy gets, where I live an xbox game is 100 last decent thing I bought was a pair of in the ear headphones for 45.00 ...
  20. When a replacement was found, based on it being me who owned the club, who wouldn't mind it breaking even. If it's Ashley though, I'd rather keep Pardew as he seems capable of working with Ashley and we are at least in the top tier still.
  21. My view is that for government information, such as this , which can be used to personally identify an individual , should NEVER be offshored, especially to economies such as India. Bribery and data theft is just too big a risk. As far as personal use goes , as mentioned in the post above, the individual should take the responsibility to safeguard their data, the internet is the equivalent of a post it note board out on the street (without SSL of course). George is a bit alarmist really though when he starts banging on about smart kettles. There are many methods available such as Tor browsing, or ghostery, even internet explorer's "in-private" mode helps. The biggest risk I've seen lose individuals hundreds of thousands of pounds is pure naivety, things like not putting a password on their phone and tablet, problem is, no ones educating them. Bringing it into current events, I'm on the fence with Facebook (who I hate) over this current headline of them needing to take responsibility for people using it for terrorism īn personal messages. My main thought is that pre internet, the telephone was a good way to coordinate terrorist events, but it was the government security forces responsibility to police it, not BT. Scary thought on data protection went largely unmissed last year when Facebook performed a large scale psychological experiment on it's users, to see if they could effect a users mood, and subsequently their wall posts. This is totally unethical and angers me greatly, worse still they refuse to divulge the users affected, if a psychology institution did this it would face litigation. (its supposed to be more than half a million british and us citizens) My 2 cents, and for once not entirely based on just opīnion, a rarity here!
  22. appreciate the questions, answer is that I can't
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.