Renton

The idea that a sentient being created the big bang is probably a lot easier to grasp than the singularity, which is for me, mind-blowing! But them creationists is probably right, the world is, what is it, 10,000 years old? 54452[/snapback] 6000 and a bit I think. It's been calculated from the old testament very accurately indeed. Oh, and we are all results of incest, and black people are black because they fell in a barrel of red wine iirc. 54458[/snapback] I thought it was 12,000. Calculated by adding up the ages of everyone descended from Adam and Eve, if you please. 54460[/snapback] 6000. I'm willing to go to war over this, you heretical bastard!

The idea that a sentient being created the big bang is probably a lot easier to grasp than the singularity, which is for me, mind-blowing! But them creationists is probably right, the world is, what is it, 10,000 years old? 54452[/snapback] 6000 and a bit I think. It's been calculated from the old testament very accurately indeed. Oh, and we are all results of incest, and black people are black because they fell in a barrel of red wine iirc.

Zathras, are you saying anything that is not demonstrable under controlled conditions cannot be regarded as a fact?

Is he for real? He's fucking modelled himself on him! 54432[/snapback] How did you nick that photo? The site said no to me basically.

I think I've read all Dawkin's books except that one, and I completely agree with those sentiments. It sickens me how American soceity is "devolving" under the neocons. To be fair, it sickens a lot of Americans too. They are becoming a very divided country.

There. Happy.

oh no it isnt,it's a whole science of evolutionary biology,which accounts for whole molecular evolutionary systems,not just humans,it even gives michael behe's irreducible complexity idea a good kicking.not new either as h.j muller was writing about it betwen the wars.i'll see if i cant find a handy synopsis of it. 54407[/snapback] Apologies, i'm refering to the evolution from apes to humans. Also i'd like to point out that i am not a biologist nor have i studied, just read the occasional book and article. On this basis alone i am sure that the idea that humans came from apes is not a 100% certainty blah, blah, blah as per my earlier post. I'm not oblivious to the similarities but, though it may seem tongue in cheek, my every day observations would lead me to think apes descended from man. I see men/women behaving like monkeys all the time, and though i don't visiti the zoo often, i've yet to see a monkey act like me. Try and restrain yourselves chaps before you respond to that last bit 54411[/snapback] I haven't got a clue what you are whittering on about here, but you've just admitted you are essentially ignorant about the topic, so its probably no loss. I doubt there are any biologists of any worth who doubt evolution is the mechanism that has created the biodiversity we see on the Earth, including ourselves. Their is still some argument over the the exact details of the mechanism of course. And I would agree that the evolution of a common ancestor of chimpanzees and man is one of the least understood areas. I think this is due to practical problems resulting from an incomplete fossil record (only a tiny proportion of skeletons fossilize) rather than those damn perverted aliens though.

Not the first lass in the locality to have had her cockles warmed by Nobby 54247[/snapback] And I'm sure he will let you blow his trumpet if you ask nicely. Aimed at Catmag, not Alex btw.

Well they haven't got the crowd or Keegan really, have they?

Still not old enough to have witnessed us winning a domestic trophy.

I think that's down to their style of defending though. They're very negative and defend as deep as possible as they know they'll be under the cosh a lot no matter what system they play. That's why they went out and signed de Zeeuw & Henchoz. Two very average centre-backs, but who are excellent in the air, so when balls do fly into their box, 9 times out of 10, they'll get rid of it. Put either of them at Arsenal, Man U, etc. and they'd be found out no problem. 54014[/snapback] Yet they almost got a draw against Chelsea, and by all accounts looked the better team? They're organised, use tactics, and have a great morale. That is the key.

Ruel Fox came here in his black and white socks. Well, I liked him.

Look Renton, here's a newsflash for you: THIS IS NOT MY OR ANYBODY ELSE'S STEROTYPE. IT IS WHAT LAURENT ROBERT IS REALLY LIKE. How many times does he have to go to the press with this sort of shit before you get that? The "La la I'm not listening" approach can only be taken so long. Sooner or later you'll come to your senses. :D 53937[/snapback] He is stereotyped though, all the time. Terms like lazy French bastard are common currency, even when he's producing the goods. If its not a stereotype, where is the relevance that he's French? Its funny how people go hysterical because he says a few inappropriate things to the press, which others do all the time. I don't really want to comment on this latest "outburst" because of its source. What I will say is though I rarely disagreed with what he said when he was with us, including the infamous pre-Sporting comments, all of which were irrefutably correct. I tend to get more wound up over players get involved in sex and alcohol scandals personally, and generally being a waste of space, but there you go. 53963[/snapback] 53965[/snapback]

Look Renton, here's a newsflash for you: THIS IS NOT MY OR ANYBODY ELSE'S STEROTYPE. IT IS WHAT LAURENT ROBERT IS REALLY LIKE. How many times does he have to go to the press with this sort of shit before you get that? The "La la I'm not listening" approach can only be taken so long. Sooner or later you'll come to your senses. :D 53937[/snapback] He is stereotyped though, all the time. Terms like lazy French bastard are common currency, even when he's producing the goods. If its not a stereotype, where is the relevance that he's French? Its funny how people go hysterical because he says a few inappropriate things to the press, which others do all the time. I don't really want to comment on this latest "outburst" because of its source. What I will say is though I rarely disagreed with what he said when he was with us, including the infamous pre-Sporting comments, all of which were irrefutably correct. I tend to get more wound up over players get involved in sex and alcohol scandals personally, and generally being a waste of space, but there you go.

This has nothing to do with Souness. Robert has proved himself to be a complete prick, can you honestly believe otherwise? That this is all some elaborate media hoax? I know what you mean about how the media portray certain players but Robert's quite clearly taking the piss. You do have to feel sorry for him because he's bordering on retarded but not because he's been misrepresented. 53929[/snapback] When it comes to handling the media, Robert is a complete idiot, I concur. But then so is Roy Keane. So is Souness. IMO.

Because the Sun would never do that. Once again, if Robert is a total wanker, what does that make certain other individuals still at the club? He has a tendency to shoot his mouth off true. But does Souness himself not do this? I expect you'll conveniently forget his frequent outbursts, at every club he has been with. 53912[/snapback] 53913[/snapback] Aye, why not produce a picture of a fisherman or something? Or you could always answer the points I made, of course. 53917[/snapback] What points man? How can you defend the bloke? I really don't understand why you don't give up. Whether Souness is prone to outbursts or not doesn't take away from the fact that Robert is a penis does it? 53925[/snapback] I'm not particularly defending him. I know he can act like a dick, as lots of football players and managers can, and in many cases I believe are far worse. The question is, is he, or was he, worth the effort? I think yes, you think no, fair enough. None of this changes what he did or didn't do for us though - I'm not the one continually dragging these stories up. And no, I wouldn't even wipe my arse on the S*n let alone believe anything they have to say. Neither would you if it didn't reinforce your stereotype I suspect, which is their intention.

If only for how hard security'll have to work to keep me away.... *sigh* 53899[/snapback] I think you need help tbh. I would imagine he is repulsive to 99% of women!

No more a coincidence than the fact Souness has been shit everywhere he has been probably.

Because the Sun would never do that. Once again, if Robert is a total wanker, what does that make certain other individuals still at the club? He has a tendency to shoot his mouth off true. But does Souness himself not do this? I expect you'll conveniently forget his frequent outbursts, at every club he has been with. 53912[/snapback] 53913[/snapback] Aye, why not produce a picture of a fisherman or something? Or you could always answer the points I made, of course.

Because the Sun would never do that. Once again, if Robert is a total wanker, what does that make certain other individuals still at the club? He has a tendency to shoot his mouth off true. But does Souness himself not do this? I expect you'll conveniently forget his frequent outbursts, at every club he has been with.

Well, it is great. Seriously though, the general chat is no more active than here, and the less said about the footy forum the better. All imo, of course.

So what's this Evens person like? Is he Welsh as well?

I like Alan_Shearer_is_geet_lush.

Agree. Can we tempt them over here? The decent ones, that is. And I do realise HTT will go mental.

Not at all. Romario was a much bigger pain in the arse for Robson than Robert, he makes a direct comparison with them in his book. And Gemmill - both are flair franch players, who are tempermental and talk bollocks off the pitch. Class comparison tbh!