wolfy

Of course I do , on Earth. It means jack shit where the planets and star distances are concerned on a so called spinning Earth.

Convection needs air or water...in space, that's pointless, so there's your first thing. Conduction is needing the use of particles to hit each other for heat to travel in something like a solid, which space being basically devoid of the particles we have on Earth, it renders that just about pointless as well and even if there are a small amount of particles in the vacuum of space, they would not collide anywhere near as they would on Earth, so there's two that are pointless basically.

I don't need to answer the question about size. I explained about the size and distance of something with the ball and you judging that distance. I didn't mention triangulation for it.

You're wrong.

On Earth its convection, radiation and conduction.

You have a lot to learn Sammy lad.

Aye I understand heat in a vacuum and I also understand how components burn out if they are not vented/fanned.

A few things. The vacuum itself, the tin foil and the lack of a fan, which as I said is pointless in a vacuum. The components would radiate their heat but it cannot travel fast enough away , so it builds up and builds up, eventually burning the component out. Take a look at your own computer and tell me what would happen of it didn't have a fan inside it and that's in an atmosphere.

Very true.

The satellite would radiate heat only from and around it's own components, so yes, in space but only in the space near the component radiating the heat, meaning burnt out components.

Because it's true. And you're right, peanuts are lovely.

In space triangulation does not work, now that should be common sense to you.

I've never said the size of any object had to do with triangulation.

The parts of the satellite would radiate the heat around it's own components which means it would simply build up as it cannot dissipate it's heat away fast enough, unless it had a fan and we know a fan is useless in a vacuum.

Nothing, On Earth but in space, triangulation doesn't work.

Satellites do not exist in space but if they did, they would dissipate their heat only around their own components, meaning it would build up and up until burnout which would be fairly quick.

Peanuts are lovely.

There lies the problem. Your common sense tells you they know the distances to planets based on trigonometry and triangulation and such, yet where planets are concerned, they don't know the size, they cannot measure the distance like they can measure distances on Earth. You are reading their calculations and going by them, so you immediately accept what they say but it's all guesswork.

I don't need to read up on it.A vacuum is empty space virtually. Heat can dissipate from it if it's not shielded. Like a light bulb, we can feel the heat from it because it's glass, yet it can dissipate it's heat because it's got an atmosphere around the outside of it regardless of it being a vacuum inside of it. In a vacuum flask, it is coated in reflective silver, so heat stays inside the thermos and cannot get out because it's blocked. The only reason your coffee/tea goes cold over time is because of the stopper, plus the top portion (neck) being connected. They supposedly shield satellites in tin foil which is even more stupid because they basically kill off any chance of any heat escaping but if a satellite was in space, it can't radiate heat away anything like it could against an atmosphere and would simply burn out.

Space, that's what.We are trapped on this planet and I mean trapped..we do not get off and we do not get anywhere near outside of our atmosphere, so radio waves, triangulation and any other means of gauging distances is rendered pointless. If you believe in a spinning 1000mph plus Earth, then gauging anything is pointless with planets and stars. We are told that we see the light of a star as it was millions of years ago..what utter utter bullshit.

The Sun is a ball of fire, it's meant to do what it does, which is, give heat out that keeps us all alive on this planet.A satellite cannot dissipate it's heat away fast enough in a vacuum, which means a burn out of components. Like I said, it's all irrelevant because there are no satellites in space anyway.

The suns heat can radiate through space until it hits out atmosphere and agitates it, giving us the heat we feel.Satellites are inside a vacuum and cannot push heat away unless there was a fan inside, which we all know a fan is no use in a vacuum. The heat they radiate would be around itself, meaning it stays and builds up and builds up until component failure but it's all irrelevant because there are no man made objects in space anyway, nor has there ever been.

I don't agree with what they say about planetry and star distances. I don't think they are close to a guess, I think they are way out.Light year stars that we can see and shit like that just makes me laugh because it's all bollocks as far as I'm concerned.

I think I follow my own arguments quite well. If I look foolish to people then I have no control over that but it's quiet where I'm sitting and I don't hear anyone calling me a fool.I do see people calling me it but I've got broad shoulders and an appetite for playing it.

Did I say that?