wolfy

Not at all. I'm merely saying what is the reality. I don't see anything being picked to bits. I see it as being weakly picked at.

Yep, but nobody uses any globe to navigate, they use flat maps.

Most probable, but only because we were told it was a movie. What's the difference with the other so called astronauts being shown doing similar things as regards going up in shuttles and into so called space? The difference is, we get told that this is the real deal.

Level to the ground on a globe? Never mind the scale. A globe is a globe and will not be level no matter how much someone says it is. Your plane flies by a artificial horizon on the instrument panel to keep it level. How do you even have an horizon on a globe? If you were up in the air looking over a globe, horizontally, you would be looking at so called space or sky. Look over a flattish potential circle and you will then always have a horizon.

How many people do you know that use a globe to navigate? How many do you know that use a flat map to navigate?

I could go and see Liv Tyler and ask her if her father, Bruce Willis really went into the shuttle and landed on that asteroid, then blew it up...and himself. I wonder what she would say?

You can circumnavigate a circle, so how would you know?

If planes fly level then how can they be flying over a globe? They would literally start to fly off into the so called space from that so called globe. If they were flying level and going from point to point around a potential circle, then they would easily be able to keep a level artificial horizon. The globe makes no sense at all.

How do navigation systems assume the world is a globe?

No commercial pilots have to be in on any scam. They fly using electronic instruments. They follow a path and land, then take off again and follow another set path. Veer off course and you're in danger of being shot down. Isn't that the way it all works?

I don't think anyone can prove a rotating globe due to it being basically nonsense. However; if I could actually see astronauts get into a massive rocket as we are shown and told about and actually 100% certain, lift off into the sky, then I would never question anything about a globe or space rocketry/endeavours. Other than that it would take some real proof that is nailed on to make me believe this Earth is a globe, because I'm 99.99% sure that it isn't.

If you believe in a globe then you're free to try. If you do not believe you walk about on a globe then I'd suggest not taking the same direction, unless you follow an east or west compass point. Then you'll be fine.

There's no direct proof, at all. There are many things proposed that pretend to show a rotating globe but none of them remotely stack up to scrutiny, common sense and logic, as well as natural science, which the globe model goes against in many way. But like I said before; that's my opinion on it which will not change unless evidence comes along that actually proves my thoughts on a globe duping, wrong. Bearing in mind I spent many years believing all the supposed truth's about a globe and now totally go against it, means I've taken the time to take out the jammed in pieces of that jigsaw that were made to fit by force but can clearly be seen to be a total mismatch to the picture build.

You're free to try.

Like I told you earlier. There's no direct proof of a globe but plenty enough to think about in terms of showing that it isn't. You're free to go any which way you feel suits you.

That's another story.

I'd be quite happy to accept I'm wrong if it can be proved I am. I'd be quite happy to accept a spinning globe Earth if it can be proved we live on one. The reality is that it cannot be proved and logic dictates we are living in a different set up to the one that has been schooled into us. There is absolutely nothing that proves a globe, physically, except for people to basically follow supposed space videos and pictures, etc, as well as all the added in gobbledygook of dark matter and warped space time, plus black holes, plus a whole host of other stuff that basically coaxes people into a belief. I know all this because I used to follow the exact same schooling of it all and it really does take some waking up to it all.

I just felt it was a yes or no answer and my answer was no. I didn't know we were playing a game of rattles.

And it won't stop me now. I just don't have it as a forefront thought.

At least you're thinking.

No.

Sort of but I haven't really went into any depth on it.

As far as you're concerned it did, unless you want to deny it to yourself.

Natural science. Look around you at lakes and oceans. Look at all water and see that it's flat and level. People even use water to ensure level construction over uneven land. I could make water stay around ball by filling a plastic bag up and placing the ball inside of it and sealing it but it doesn't emulate what we actually naturally witness. However, if you're happy that huge oceans, lakes and rivers can simply stay on a ball whilst flowing, then be my guest.

Anything supposedly solid would potentially be spewed from the central energy sun through pressure build but that's speculation. The reality is, I've never seen any falling rocks and nobody really seems to get hit by any falling rocks, except the odd pretence of someone's home getting hit by a fist sized rock that somehow leaves nice holes for us all to see. The world's full of this and that, just as it's full of "it was this ........................BIG" fishermen/anglers. So, the jury is still out with me on this falling rock stuff that we never ever seem to get hit by, bearing in mind we're supposedly a shooting gallery for them, as well as all the supposed satellites orbiting a supposed globe that just never seem to get hit by anything and are up there for 10/20/30 years, as we are told. I don't know why people don't question this stuff more. Let's face it, we question the average Billy liar in pubs and clubs and what not with their stories that are 100% more believable than what we officially get told about this space garbage.