wolfy

Show me the self evident testable FACTS.

Yes, but in many different ways. Memory loss can be construed as a mental illness and there's variations of this. Schizophrenia is classed as mental illness in the varying forms. Paranoia in varying forms, one of which can be with the above. I could go on and on and on. Let's see what other things can be classed as mental illness. How about questioning something official? What about not being as quick as drawing a picture of something we can all see and are given equal presence of, or does that come down physically less able? Does a person that can't read or write have a mental illness? What about a person that is scared of ghosts? I could go on and on, so what do we class as mental illness against things that are not? Do we work on official lines for this and accept that ADHD is a mental illness that years ago got a smacked arse? Discuss. Maybe I am and I don't know it. But then again maybe you are and you don't know it, or can you explain to me how you would know? Maybe I am mentally ill and I actually do know it but you are maybe mentally ill and you actually really don't have a clue that you are. We could form many variations of this. I agree. I've seen many people see ghosts. I've seen people who tell me that people of all races are following them. I've seen people run screaming around a supermarket just because they can't have a chocolate bar...although I admit, I am learning to accept I won't get one). And so on and so on. Discuss.

I'm talking about official lines. If you don't think mass opinion stumps all other minority opinions, then fine, you stick to that. Arguing about football teams and music, etc, is a personal choice by a variation of masses, not just individuals or severe minority.

I don't know exactly what went on that day. I honestly do not know. I can only question certain stuff that does not conform to rational logical thinking. I can't walk about telling all and sundry that this and that happened for sure. All we have to go on are two sides. We have the official side of things and the other side that questions the official side. Unless I was physically there to literally see what we were told happened, then I only have official stuff put out for me to either accept of question. The problem with all of that is, it is open to all kinds of water muddying techniques by all kinds of people with all kinds of motives. All I'm interested in is being told the truth and I honestly do not think we are being told the entire truth with one hell of a lot of things. The issue is, if you can question one thing that literally makes no real life genuine physical sense about a certain happening, then it stands to reason that more questions are begged, which require rational, logical answers. We do not get that with a lot of stuff and most people know this but are either not too bothered about it and would rather just accept the official version (which is fair enough) or they will argue in favour of the official version as being 100% truth against any questioning person, as if they were physically there and actually know for sure, when the truth is much much further from that. If I was 18 or 20 or whatever, then I wouldn't be typing this, because I'd most likely be doing all the stuff that younger people do. The fact that I am is because I've had enough time and opportunity to actually see stuff differently to what I thought was just the norm. For this very reason I understand why people will go on the defensive or go into frenzy attack mode at times, on certain forums or even at physical conferences.

In the world of mass acceptance of anything officially put out, you are correct. That does not make what you say, correct. It just means that mass peer pressure ensures that it will be deemed correct, or else.

There's some things that I believe COULD have some mileage and others being a tad weaker. You just appear to accept anything told to you officially and think none of what you put above could have possibilities as to not being what we are told. That's all well and good and you're entitled to spend the rest of your life with that thought process. After all, it's handed to you on a plate, as it is with the masses. The major thing about it all is, you cannot directly prove any of what has been schooled into you throughout life. What's more strange is the amount of people that can look at news media in all aspects and declare it nonsense or in many cases fabrications. People also know that those in power in all aspects, lie to us. Knowing all this and then outright denying that all the above is all above board is a massive case of a reliance on the sale of emotional content. We are basically bullied into acceptance by all kinds of means. If a person doesn't trust those in power, why does that person have to be mentally ill? If a person goes against the norm with certain things, then why is that person labelled a flame war proponent? If a person won't back down on something they feel strongly about, then they're a troll. People use these labels because it's the norm for people to follow a script, even though most people won't have any real understanding as to why the script is being played out, other than the person on the end of the words is a person that goes against the grain. Human mimicking is the name of the game, in the main.

When every person has to follow one train of thought then we might as well get used to marching to the same tune until we expire. It's getting closer and closer, it appears.

Nobody's forced to take part. It's just one topic of many topics on this entire forum.

Yeah, that's what they tell us. They can also calculate it all on supposed distant planets or moons, as in the moon they tell us is a big rock just orbiting around a ball that we live on. They calculated it perfectly before 1969, apparently and landed craft, then men on this 1/6th of Earth's supposed gravity, rock of apparent cement like surface. When asked to explain what gravity is. Well. They just don't know. They only know what it apparently does. Ask how they know gravity is real and they will drop a ball or a rock and point to it hitting the floor. What more proof does anyone need? The real reason for why we survive on Earth and why everything happens on Earth, is right there in our faces as atmospheric pressure and changes to it energy from the centre creating high and low pressures around the circle. Gravity makes no real sense at all but atmospheric pressure upon dense mass perfectly explains it for those who have a mind to want to think on those lines.

Nahh; there's no such thing as gravity. The gravity we are told about is either weak or strong depending on what is thrown at people as regards supposed real science of Earth and off Earth, as we are coaxed into.

Try not to worry too much about me.

I think Anita is a decent squad player and would do a decent job for us in our first season back in the premier league.

Defoe might be ok for one more season in the premier league but no way would I have him at £130,000 a week.

Yep, heat dissipates through all those on Earth. Radiating heat in so called space is a nonsense. There would be no medium for anything to radiate anywhere. Space is apparently a near vacuum with supposed scattered particles. How can anything be anything in an environment of random scattered particles separated by an absolute void? It's very easy for anyone to say they understand convection, conduction and radiation when dealing with what we actually understand in everyday atmospheric conditions. Once space comes into it, it becomes nonsense but is kept alive as magical radiation just randomly in an environment that just manages to have random particles just floating about and yet radiation can somehow dissipate into this void in between these random scattered particles to somehow cool down a constant overheating electronic so called satellite. It's nonsense when you think about it, as far as I'm concerned, but feel free to go with that. It's your choice, as is everyone's. I'll just keep calling nonsense on this nonsense and maybe those looking in can be given some food for thought. It's amazing what stuff we've been brainwashed with in terms of this kind of so called space stuff of fantasy. You understand orbits because you've been told that something going at speed can fall around a so called huge globe and maintain a steady so called orbit due to gravity acting like an invisible string. You accept this for no other reason than...well...why not. I mean, it's official, right? Good old Isaac Newton managing to suss out the gravity with his apple and what not. Good old scientists just knowing that a craft will orbit a supposed globe just as supposed planets and moon orbit suppose stars and what not. Imagine having a so called ISS orbiting a globe at 18,000 mph as we're told, just falling towards the Earth but managing to avoid crashing into it because the speed is near exact enough to actually just fall around it. Think about that seriously. Now think about the supposed geosynchronous satellites supposedly keeping an exact track with a supposed globe. Apparently this satellite is somehow put into a so called orbit at 23,000 miles out and follow an exact location of the Earth as it falls around it, plus using boosters or something to correct a course if it falls a little, or whatever. We are being fed absolute utter nonsense that would be absolutely fine if told as a sci-fi fantasy. The issue is, it's not only being told as a reality...people are actually being totally schooled into it. People are being basically forced to abandon their natural logic in favour of this complete nonsense.

Wrong answer.

I don't understand how it works and neither do you. You can follow what you're told but it makes no real sense, at all.

Of course there is. There's load of information that Earth is a spinning globe and space rockets work and satellites work flawlessly for decades upon decades. There's info on probes going to pluto and landing on asteroids, etc. There's lot's of stuff out there that potentially dupes the masses. The issue is in finding what's legitimate as a verifiable truth and what are hypothesis or misinformation, down to downright disinformation.

Imagine continually adding heat to a thermos flask and not being able to lose that heat. That would be your satellites, if they existed.

So basically you have to try and picture a supposed satellite orbiting a globe at 23,000 miles out that somehow manages to get that far on it's own, to take up a geosynchronous orbit with that supposed spinning globe, apparently receiving any amount of signals and returning them back to Earth, whilst also kicking in some kind of thruster at regular intervals to keep it in this geosynchronous orbit, as well as managing to keep all component inside of it cool, without any means to cool them. It can be achieved by magic but it cannot be achieved by realistic means. Cell towers and high masts with dishes, plus undersea cables, etc, all have components that heat up, because we all know that all electronic equipment uses heat, yet it's dissipated quite easily in atmosphere. No cooling fan or heat sink is going to dissipate any heat from components inside a low pressure system, or near vacuum as we are told space is.

Electronics using heat sinks and/or fans. They work fine in an atmosphere for extremely long periods of time, continuously. This alone scuppers so called space satellites.

In its entirety, I'm not sure. There's no real way to know, because we'll only be living in a certain area of it around a centre.

How are electronics cooled?

Are there any electronics experts on here, or anyone familiar with how they operate, in terms of being able to work without overheating?

Well, you've flew to Australia with a stop off at Dubai. I'm not arguing about countries or destinations in terms of flights you were on. None of what you're mentioning is going to prove to you that you are going over and under a globe.

They had nothing left to play for, just like at the start of the season, before they even kicked a ball.