wolfy

Ahhh, I see. Ok; I didn't realise you had a nurse.

I reckon Gouffran's against Derby was up there.

Who's we?

But we actually do. We may not directly sit there and say, " ohhhh we're always being duped." What I mean is, most people will refuse to question stuff that is sold to them, which begs questions. We all do it, but feel free to believe you're not took in by anything if that's how you go. I still get duped to this very day and will do until I expire, in all kinds of ways, like 99.9% of others. It doesn't just have to be in so called space science. It can be in anything.

Imagine all that money going on fictional endeavours. Another scam to rob the already stretched individual of their hard earned money. Privatisation pretence or fictional space adventures, etc. We seem to accept being duped because it's just easier and less hassle.

I'll be sure to let you know whenever it happens.

It certainly doesn't matter in this case.

Oh, ok, I just thought you knew facts about it all. No problem.

Any time you want to explain all this stuff that everyone seems to know, feel free to share it.

Is that your final offer?

Why is all of science broken if I reject what they say about atoms? People reject god and you can't see god, can you? And yet religion is huge, right? When scientists tell you they split the atom, you accept it as we all did. They managed to split something that could not be seen, so how did they manage to do it? Explain that and we can go on from there as to why I should accept stuff instead of questioning. I'm looking for the REAL reasons as to what is what, instead of the nonsense we are handed on a plate to eat without daring to leave scraps. Nobody's asking you to tell me anything. You're making life simple for yourself by copping out. All I ever see is, "no wolfy it's not. It's real wolfy. We know, wolfy. It's been proved, wolfy. None of it is doing anything and you know this. You simply cannot directly prove anything I'm arguing against except to pander to mainstream science as your open book of supposed facts.

Is this your final offer?

Size is unimportant with this stuff. It just means more of the same stuff. The issue is in keeping oceans and lakes, plus flowing rivers and all other bodies of water, not to mention water falls and all the rest of it...on the globe you've been coaxed into accepting, whilst spinning against a supposed near vacuum of space and yet losing supposedly, some atmosphere to so called space and yet all water magically adheres to the globe. Just sitting back and logically thinking about all of it, not just this, should make people seriously question the supposed science of it, told by people who were more probable decent story tellers than actual real investigative scientists.

What are you proving with this? Is this about the edges appearing like they curve? That's atmospheric squeeze on the edges but notice the surface is flat. Now see if you can find one of water staying on a ball of any size that you can physically verify all of the water stays on, all around. Just remember, you need to prove stuff to yourself, not to me. I'm just helping people see how ridiculous mainstream supposed scientists have totally brainwashed people into accepting nonsense without realising it.

Not quite right, is it? There's absolutely plenty that I accept and a hell of a lot that I don't accept as being a full on truth. The world isn't going to change because I think this so there's no worries. You tell me how we pick out the realistic stuff from the news these days? Most people know that the news media lie their arses off or use propaganda, etc, so what's the issue with me not trusting them? Present me with evidence that you 100% know is correct in what I'm arguing against. I'll present one thing I do know. Water will always seek a flat level. You can verify this because this is natural science. This is the real natural science that all people can verify for themselves and accept. The only time that changes is when the story tellers add in magical fantasy and by intimidation techniques, manage to make people follow that thought process to the point that some will never question it and will guard it like a scrap yard dog. Maybe have all of them and it'll save you pondering. I bet you never thought of that, right?

I don't know what they're reviewing. Are they reviewing Space science or a globe or what? Or are they reviewing a book for a story that they can accept for publication?

True, but then again I am questioning the stuff that cannot be proven. We get told that gravity works fine and dandy and that warped space time keeps the Earth and everything working like a dream. We get told all kinds of stuff that is pushed out as a fact but looks extremely iffy when looked into. So what technology are we talking about that you know for sure works in how you're told, by direct physical proof...of which I go against or question?

So you just assume everything is above board, right?

So you don't know what they look at but assume it's all correct? Are we dealing with the stuff I'm talking about or something that can be directly proved?

Are you dealing with anything that you cannot directly prove? Are you in acceptance of something that may have a massive question mark over, or are you sure of the facts?

Yep, the peer review crew. Who are these people and what gives them the expertise to verify whether something is correct or not? It's a jury service of supposed factual science and a best fit according to how the situation pans out.

The professor at the university standing in front of the class talks about gravity. "How can we know it's gravity?" He says. All the students look at each other a bit bemused. The professor then drops his pen. "THis is how we know." And basically this is what we are dealt. It is what it is because they tell you it is.

It's amazing how we can go to a library and accept that all books on the fiction shelf are exactly that. And all books on the non-fiction shelf are factual. What's the difference between a good fictional author and a good non-fictional author? How do we tell if what they put out is what they portray it to be?

Strange as hell to be messing around with this stuff when he had a decent contract at Newcastle with excellent money and messed it all up with his antics, only to sort himself out to get back to putting his name back on the radar with a smaller club giving him the chance to do that...and then this. To be honest, I was surprised Newcastle gave him a second chance after the way he was going on inside and outside of the club. It probably shows how badly we were run on a professional basis at that time. Anyway, he's not our problem anymore.

You have no clue about my theory, so how are you going to understand what I'm doing with it? Water droplets sit proud of a surface because they are not dense enough to overcome the atmospheric pressure squeezing them. It's that simple. It's the same reason why a glass of water can be turned upside down with a beer mat placed over it, even full of pin holes and no water falls. It's because of atmospheric pressure pushing up against the tiny amount of it left inside the glass which cannot equalise that push in terms of pushing back, because the bottom of the glass that is now upright, stops the atmosphere from pushing that water. It's much more simple than people think but they opt for gravity that is unexplainable as to what it is but will be explained as to what it supposedly does and yet the very thing we all know but cast aside (atmospheric pressure) is done so with a fictional force acceptance by mass peer pressure and earlier life indoctrination. Have a look at your lap top and tell me what would happen if there wasn't a fan working if it was in use 24 hours a day? They have grilles for a reason, to dissipate the heat from the heat-sink and components. Wrap that lap top inside a plastic bag and place it inside a close fitting bag, then watch it overheat and give up. And they try to dupe us into believing a so called satellite can simply vent it's continuous heat as well as continuous battery charging for decades on end without a blip.