wolfy

Have you ever walked around a circle?.... X

I just go with the flow on that. As long as I'm changing places and enjoying the change, it can be called anything. It beats fictional trips to floating balls in empty spaces.

You can call each and everything what it tells you. EU and what not. You can argue this Brexit carry on and get deep down into the politics argument forever and a day. The truth of the matter is there for all to see... and that is...we are getting systematically toyed with whichever party takes over. They feather their own nests whilst promising to a small makeover to ours, which ends up as a extra diluted whitewash. Your voting card gives you the mindset that you are being part of changing something or keeping something you think is working. None of it is working because none of it is set out to work like people think. Nothing is done by accident and mistakes are not made that are not already accounted for with contingency plans. It's just a game of chess between all parties. The losers are always us, no matter which way it's looked at. All this in or out the EU is a nonsense. It doesn't alter anything in reality, it just appears to alter certain things, until later we all find out that nothing's really changed much and certainly never for the overall better. Just snippets of pacifying words and the odd action to show a sort of truth before it's all taken away with the sleight of hand. If the British people really did speak out. And I mean the real British population, without class separation, then this country would not be running like it is. Hospitals would not be closing and understaffed, with staff working ridiculous hours, as just a starter. Nurses classed as low class and paid crap wages then lokums coming in and being paid 50? 60? 80? 100 or so an hour. It's not accidental. None of it is accidental. Just remember that all money is sanctioned from the top for whatever happens in this country, as an instance. People are governed by what might happen to them if they vote for a certain party. The reality is that all parties will work on the simple stance of giving to take away. I wouldn't waste my time voting because they count for nothing in the end.

Going back to Cyprus this year. This time I will hire a car and get to see a lot more of it.

Whatever floats your boat.

I'm happy that Wenger won the FA cup with Arsenal again. It should be a nice two fingers up to the Arsenal fans who slaughtered him. I hope he leaves and they go on the slide down the league or win nothing for years. It's a bit harsh for the genuine fans that didn't slaughter him but sometimes people just don't appreciate what they have until it's not there any more.

Boris Johnson rides a bike and wears crap fitting clothes. Take a look at most of them. They're unkempt. There will be some real genuine people out there who want to get into politics just to try to help people. It's what happens after gaining entry into that elite. The cover purports to tell and sell a story but the entire reading never always reflects the cover version. These people don't end up with all the trimmings by just gaining a few expenses and a small insignificant salary. The beggar on the street can look anything but a well off person to those who buy into the acting. Or the real beggar who starts off in a genuine state of hunger and who realises that this begging lark is potentially life changing if he/she decides to take full advantages of the perks that go far and above covering the initial well being.

All parties are just separate tentacles from the same octopus ,as far as I'm concerned. It's just a party of people taking turns in pushing empty promises to the population classes. Ordinary people given MP status with the chance of having some higher stance in the country/world and willing to be stringed up to the puppeteers so they can dance to their tune. Ultimately the poor always lose. The poor will be thrown a few treats every now and then to pacify them in between systematically being taken for every penny they have, which is extremely little, The low class as they are known. The middle and then the higher classes have it a little better, or did, but as anyone can see, the middle classes are actually being diluted or concentrated, depending on their potential. Basically the middle class become the lower class or if they're lucky, jump into the higher class bracket. All controlled by the master puppeteers. The end result is always that the rich get richer and everyone else pays for it. The illusion that any party is there for you should be fairly clear to anyone that that is all it is and ever was. I feel sorry for the kids born today and even in the last decade or so.

Players using all kinds of family ties to get into various other national teams after being deemed not top level enough for another, is, on the whole, a bit of cheating the weak rules, but, if it gives that player a chance to play against top level opposition, including the national team that snubs him, then why not. Football was sold to the devil long before all this stuff was happening so they might as well just add whatever extras to it as time goes on until it becomes unrecognisable from the football that we started out with, whether that's national teams or domestic leagues around the world.

I think the last thing we need is a keeper, especially one that's at the arse end of his career. We extended Krul's contract by one year which seemed to me to be a mutual benefit to both club and Krul in terms of him not dropping down a league and fighting for a place after injury; earning him a chance to go back to his home country and play a season in their league, without affecting his contract here. There could be two reasons for this. !. Benitez rates him and wants him back as number 1 , assuming premier league status, which we have now got. 2. Benitez is simply protecting the club's sell on valuation (whatever that may be) and was not willing to allow the contract to run down so the vultures could come picking. The thing is, if it's the first option, then Elliot and Darlow are not going to both sit back and wait. At least one would want out, I would imagine. Krul hasn't exactly set the bed alight since regaining fitness after injury and never actually did so before he was injured, so his value must be pretty low, I would think. Personally I'd he more than happy to have Elliot as number 1 with Darlow as back up and sell Krul. I'd definitely keep Elliot as number 1 whatever happens as regards any of our keepers, because I think he's the more reliable keeper.

It's been bandied about that Karanka will go to Leeds and Gary Monk being earmarked for the Boro job. It'll be interesting to see how it pans out.

Because I'm not arguing against science. Science is Earth itself and all that is in it. It's there to be explored by any and all means over how ever long, by ALL creatures, not just humans. Science is natural science. Mainstream science can be natural in many ways but then become know as pseudo science, or supposed science that does not show a reality of nature. Like nonsense space or spinning globes, etc. The list is almost endless with the good the bad and the ugly of it all.

There is no battle. There are no winners. One of the biggest talking point, ever is religion and politics. Religion is made up of many belief's relating to some kind of super entity, or whatever. Try telling one religion to walk into another religion's church and shout them down. The issue is, many people who are religious are basically classed as pillars of society in their specific communities. Politicians are basically lauded by the mere average Joe's. People go to both to ask for wrongs to be righted. One by faith and the other by hope and sometimes expectation. There are also agnostic people or atheists. WHo is right and who is wrong? Who tells lies and who makes you reliant on faith? We were all brought up (or most) by schooling of some religion regardless of parents having (maybe) a different mindset. Go into a religious school and tell them you are atheist and see what happens. Go and argue one religion against the other. They are all backed to the hilt with evidence and real proof's, with many people having the visions and what not. Does this make all religions real or just the one's that hold the larger masses? What about small religions. Aren't they cults run by nutters or something, as we are told? Does anyone know which one is real and have evidence? How about Earth being a globe against some basics I've mentioned about it not being a globe? How about my thoughts on my Earth? How about flat or toroidal or dual Earth theory...and so on. Which one is right or are they all right? Ar ethey all wrong or is the globe correct by mass opinion? I don't have all the answers but then again, who does? All we go on is what those who govern us dictate to us in whatever part of land we dwell on.

I don't expect anything from you or anyone. Please yourself what you go with.

Nothing.

Absolutely, 100%. I don't know how old it is and never gave an age for it. here's plenty of evidence against the globe but most of it is circumstantial and requires each individual to actual see past the global nonsense. Some can and so can't, or won't. That's part and parcel of life in any shape or form, with people. Again, it's how people look into this stuff. It's not something that the average person can just jump into and give a direct answer to, one way or the other. It requires in depth thought but uncomplicated in depth thought, in the main. It just requires basic logic to see past the nonsense and then be able to see a bit more clear. I accept that most of you lot will mock it and I'm fine with that. Many that are looking in, who are reading it might try and think carefully on it. The end result is entirely up to each person to arrive at, regardless. Not quite. What you follow is your perceivement, by being part of mass indoctrination of so called science, the mindset to go along with there being lots of real evidence and guaranteed proof's. The reality is, there are none of what you speak of. I can imagine how it comes across to others. I may be arrogant but definitely no more arrogant than those who come at me with what they believe. Being handed your supposed truth's on a plate and copying those supposed truth's to regurgitate at will, does not make them a truth. It makes them a perceived truth among the likeminded masses. Nobody is forcing you to do anything with me.

Your evidence and theories may well be worth talking about. Do you have any as regards Earth? I haven't. It makes much more logical sense, to me, than the nonsense given out by mainstream scientists. It only holds more weight, to me, because it's my thought process. That doesn't mean it's the best theory out tehre. It's just a much better one than the schooled one that we were all brainwashed with. If you have a problem with that then dismiss it out of hand and stick to your trusted, off the peg version. Basically it's better than some and definitely as good as any, I would say, with confidence.

Like I said: there is no proof of a globe, so I'm not rejecting any evidence of any proof. I'm rejecting so called evidence of supposed proof handed to us on a plate for the masses to gobble up and regurgitate as a truth that is handed down from the fiction shelf. As for my musings. I've never portrayed them out as a truth. I mention that I have my own theories as to what Earth is, which gets misconstrued as me actually knowing what it is in any entirety. This is because I say that I know what it isn't by use of clear natural science that is testable and repeatable. The simplicity above everything is there for all to see, in water level. But: like I said time and time again; If you or anyone would rather accept oceans adhering to a spinning globe and atmosphere moving in exact unison with a solid as well as a liquid and accepting magic for answers, then you are 100% entitled to do so, as far as I'm concerned. I merely ask people to have a real think about it all. It doesn't affect me in any way if people decide to just follow the accepted norm.

If you feel the need to do it, go ahead.

There was no real point. I gave my answer to clarify it. Can you see my point?

I gave you my answers. Can you see the point I'm making?

It must be more open because I believed all that crap for long enough, so I must have opened my mind to get away from that schooled process.

It's entirely up to anyone what they want to argue or not. I've put my musings forward because I was asked about them. People don't accept any of it or really grasp what I'm saying and that's fine by me. This isn't about my theory, it's about everything we've been schooled into and how much each individual abides by it or questions some of it. You keep telling me that there's proof that the Earth is not flat and in the flat as a pancake sense you would be correct because there's gradients and mountains, etc. I neither follow a flat Earth from that thought process either, which I've already mentioned. What you cannot do is prove that Earth is a globe. All you can do to push a proof, is to follow what you've been schooled into,a s we all did. When people sit back and actually look into it all individually, without peer pressure, then some actually see how ridiculous the spinning globe is. Just seeing how ridiculous it is does not mean any person has to go looking for alternate theories as to what it could be. That's entirely down to a person willing to spend the time doing the huge almost infinite jigsaw and most don't have time for that due to unbelievable busy schedules, such as tweeting or X-box and what not, whilst others are really engrossed in their work or unwilling to even dare to take a little peek outside of the box. That's just the way it all is. Most people are terrified to openly admit to anything that goes against the norm with things like this because they ultimately know that the end result is their social standing takes a massive nosedive due to the masses parroting the same narrative.

Look into it all and see if anything they theorise over can be added or better what I m,use over myself. If not, then I just carry on putting my thoughts forward whilst disregarding the mainstream global nonsense. There are many alternate theories to a globe model. There can only be one correct answer to what Earth is and no person might be entirely correct or even all theories put together may not cover any large percentage of it. It's all down to basic natural science and natural logic to piece any snippets together. One thing is for sure, regardless of whether alternate theories are close to the mark, or not.....is.....the Earth is absolutely not a rotating globe spinning in space on a 23.5 degree axis at 1037 mph at the equator and also rotating around a central sun that is 93 million mile distant, 850,000 mile diameter, at 67,000 mph whilst also taking an elliptical so called orbit that brings it in closer or further away. It is utter nonsense.

Nahhh. I've said many times that I have alternative musings on what could be a better answer to the one we are schooled into. You have your schooled thoughts and I have my thoughts.