wolfy

No need.

You decide whatever you feel you want to. That's the way it is for me.

No.

I'll accept any view that is provable, otherwise I'm sceptical and questioning it. I used to just accept all this kind of stuff many years ago and now I question it, so I'm obviously not closed minded.

I explained it in the other topic, a while ago.

Trust them, how?

No, not at all.

Ditto.

Yep.

Of course you do.

Compartmentalisation.

It appears you trust what you are told to trust, rather than your own eyes.

I agree with you. Everyone has that choice.

If there a conspiracy then I'd hazard a guess that there have been leaks. The issue is, how does a person get it out to the general public? Mass media and opinion/reliance on anything set out for the general public will over-ride any small section of attempted whistleblowing and turn the tables on anyone doing so by labelling them nutters and every other name. Nature of the beast.

Not a global conspiracy, no. Earth is not a globe. But yes, definitely a con job between those countries that profess to have this so called energy/weapon. What evidence?

nope.

What do you actually know about the behind the scenes hierarchy of Japan or any other country? We are fed by media who are fed by those that write the scripts for them to feed us with. We are reliant on scripted scenes, at times no different to a film. I'm sure you and many have seen the nonsense that the media have spewed out and questioned it or seen it as clear crap. Do you think they all just decide to play nice after taking the piss out of the public?

Have you ever looked into a mirror at reflections? Have you ever looked into a calm lake at reflections? You are told it's a piece of rock in the vacuum of space and you accept it as that without having a clue about it, or why it looks like it does. You refuse to consider any other potential because you accept what's been spoon fed. That's your prerogative but does not make it true.

Lookout mountain air force base.

Yep, because I don't believe they are real and look pathetic in the extreme. The videos are more than close to piss taking of the general public. Like I told you earlier. To have the chance to question and be sceptical of anything, it requires something to be placed before you, whether that's a video or a photo or a script depicting a so called reality. So, if we are told the pictures are real by mainstream media/authority, then the question has to be why after 24 hours are the roads clear and why are people walking about if it's a so called atomic bomb destruction? Wipe it and you'll feel much better. Feel free to exist and never worry about what I'm bathing in. I get the feeling you're mad at something but I can't quite put my finger on it.

If you post a picture of yourself on the so called moon and told me it was real, I'm going to scrutinise it and pick holes in it if it doesn't ring true. If mainstream media etc, put out video/photo/scripture etc, then I'm going to look it all over and see if there's discrepancies if it doesn't ring true to me.

Good question. If you accept that people lie for all kinds of reasons and eye witnesses can be anything but, then you have to say that only verifiable physical evidence from yourself would suffice. Other than that, it's a reliance on stories told and the acceptance of that story as a truth, without anything other than a mass back up of like-minded people who bought into the very same story. Mass opinion is a strong and powerful tool to argue with.

I'm only a WUM to those who want to think that way. I question what I say I do and my belief's are what I say they are. Whether I'm totally correct on all or some or little, is up for debate but can only be proven or disproven with concrete evidence, for or against, which none of us possess, otherwise there would be no argument.

Take a back seat, you were always too weak and cried like a baby.

Your acceptance of historical happenings as told to you, unconditionally is entirely your prerogative. I choose to question it and by questioning anything that involves hurt or loss of life, it's obviously going to be used as a tool in a debate/argument. Using emotion shows your weakness.