wolfy

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/worker-falls-into-reactor-pool-at-san-onofre-nuclear-plant-.html

I agree it appears so far fetched because after all, we have all been brought up to believe in them and what they are capable of doing. If I said, I know for a fact they don't exist, I'd be clearly lying but I allow myself the thought that they could simply be made up for financial gain and a very effective scare tactic both on ourselves and enemy countries. We get told that America won't allow other countries such as Iran e.t.c to build a Nuke because it's a terrorist country and they will use it in anger. At least that's what we are told anyway. I wonder if Iran are sat back quietly knowing that they will never build one because it's impossible and maybe they know that there is no threat from other countries in terms of Nuking them which is why they are taking a hard line stance. All if's, but's and maybe's though I admit, yet I tend to go along with the theory that Nukes are bogus and actually seeing a diagram of what a nuke supposedly consists of in it making, I'm of the mindset that it's just far fetched in itself of them doing what they are supposed to do. I believe there's some nasty weapons out there that can inflict massive damage to a wide area but I don't buy into nukes and radiation in how they tell us. It's made out to be so toxic that anyone standing close to it will die a horrible death within hours yet there was a newspaper report in America where a worker supposedly fell into a Nuclear reactor whilst on maintenance duty and was absolutely fine even after being submerged in the reactor water. Now there's 3 ways you can view this report. 1. The man fell in and did actually die but it was covered up. 2. The man really did fall in but wasn't harmed because Nuclear power isn't what we are told it is and in-fact those reactors are simply boiling water containers powered by gas or something rather than super toxic Uranium/plutonium. 3. It didn't happen. I think number 2 is the most likely scenario from my own personal thoughts mind. I just find it strange how all these big countries appear to have hundreds if not thousands of Nukes and also supposedly some rogue nations like North Korea and yet not one accident or not one show of aggression unleashing one. Of course, the argument could be, " they won't unleash one because they know the consequences if they do"..which is all well and good but I'm very sceptical of it all to be honest. Maybe I'm just a conspiracy nut that gets caught up in stuff or maybe I'm just a person who likes to think outside the box, or maybe both eh. It makes me wonder just how much fabrication we have been brought up on against what truths we have been brought up on, which stretches back to the so called ice age or Dinosaurs and whatever, right up to present day. Before 9/11, I didn't question anything, I was just like most people and I would scoff at anyone's suggestions about stuff like this. As soon as 9/11 happened, things just didn't add up so I delved deeper into it and saw scripted lies and fabricated TV images of that day, so i THOUGHT, " hmmm, if they can fabricate this, what else have they fabricated" and basically that's why I question a lot of stuff.

I'd accept Andy Carroll coming back as long as we only paid a third of what we sold him for, so I hope we don't get into any auction over his signing.

Do you mean has it changed my opinion?If that's what you mean, then no it hasn't.

Ok.

Interesting!Where was this at, if you don;t mind me asking.

They told me it was Nuclear waste and obviously being just a new born lad at the time, I didn't question it. I still believe to this day that the glowing ring around my body is because I still eat Ready brek for breakfast.

I agree but they can suffer from debris from a blast can't they.Do you think it's possible for a city to be razed to the ground, leaving the roads looking like they've just been swept. Does that seem possible to anyone?

Very tidy roads aren't they for a place that is supposed to have been Nuked and saturated with radiaton.

As we all know, we are constantly reminded about the threat of Nuclear war aren't we? We all know about the old jokes of the three minute warning and the old "I'd boil an egg routine" if Nuclear missiles were unleashed. We also get told that, it costs billions to keep us a Nuclear force and also, it costs supposed billions to dismantle Nuclear warheads. Now we are all led to believe that Nuclear missiles are sat in Silo's with trained special armed personnel waiting for the command to launch them. So what we have here is, hundreds of Nuclear weapons, sat in Silo's decaying as we are told that Uranium/Plutonium decays and heats up, yet it appears to be fine sat inside warheads waiting years to be deployed or NOT, yet nothing happens and also, shouldn't the Uranium/plutonium weapons grade radioactive metals become too dangerous to handle. For anyone who is interested, Nuclear weapons are supposed to work by slamming a Uranium/Plutonium projectile( we will call this the fat bullet) into a few Uranium/Plutonium discs and once these two metals hit , they cause this city destroying detonation. The discs look like Lead. One thing about scientists, they can dazzle you with equations and chemical elements then baffle you with bullshit.

You are entitled to that thought Monkey.We breathe something and we are told it's Air, so I tend to go along with that. I don't subscribe to Alien Lizard Royals but that's not to say you are wrong though. It doesn't matter whether you have evidence Monkey because detectives usually go looking for clues and finger point perpetrators based on a hunch and a hope of gathering evidence, so you aren't alone.

If that's how you view me Monkey, then to you, I am a prime tit.

Call them what you want but I'd prefer to simply call them ordinary bombs with a bit more punching power.I don't buy into this radiation fissioning Uranium/Plutonium. I could be wrong mind but It's too far fetched as far as I'm concerned and I think it was made up to scare other nations into submission in the early days.

I'm not sure that what was dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki was atomic bombs and instead it was just the same as many other places that were bombed, as in Tokyo, Dresden etc which apparently were fire bombed and look no different to those cities. It seems strange how no country has ever used even one nuke, not even accidentally detonating one in a silo or any terrorists getting their hands on one and using it. Apart from that, I actually doubt they could actually work anyway with what they use to supposedly make them and fire them.

Anyone is welcome to take part.

I've asked a question, if you don't want to take part, that's fine.

Are Nuclear weapons real or made up to keep us all in check?

I suppose it brings new meaning to Women saying, " does my arse look big in this" and actually hoping they get told YES.

They're too busy with the street banner crew that's in their face.Tinfoil hat wearing dip shit's like myself are just a mere pimple on their arses. lol

Aye, it's canny strange.

I'll read through that later on. Silverstein as you know, the lease holder used to go to the windows of the world cafe at the top of the trade centre every day without fail, except he had a doctors appointment on the morning of 9/11 so didn't. Amazing eh.

Here's the new indestructible tower busting plane.

Here's your building 7.

Aye ok.

Aye , but you seem to be forgetting that the building isn't made of glass, it's made of steel and concrete, plus thick concrete floors.