wolfy

Are you trying to convey this to all your internet mates?

First of all I'm a Newcastle United fan. This is a Newcastle United forum. I joined here because it is a Newcastle United forum, so I can have my say on Newcastle and football, plus anything else in general that goes on, just like you or any other person does. I am not responsible for you not liking my posts when they don't suit you. They suited you a while back when you had plenty to say on subjects but they don't now because you spend too much of your time trying to ridicule or look for nods and winks from fellow posters who you regard as your real friends. The silly part is, you have every opportunity to ignore my posts and never having any need to respond to me, ever, but here you are responding just to tell me how boring I am. Can you understand where you might be going wrong?

Says the person who spends every post whining about posts. Are you looking for a group hug or something? Hang about, you just might get a few nods from some, which will make you feel really important.

Just stick to your normal ways, it's better that way.

Nothing wrong with you believing in fairies, if that's how you flow. However, I don't share your opinion on them.

Let's put it simply. If people are not happy about me saying they follow mainstream ideals, then that means that those people question authority. If this is the case then regardless of how it's dressed up, it means that people do not believe what they're told. So basically everything is up for question by all who do not accept/believe the official line on whatever. Those that ask me for evidence against the official line cannot provide evidence for the official line, physically and are reliant on the very thing that most people distrust in sections, which is mainstream media sources. Where peer pressure comes in and the wolf pack mentality is, the media portrays anyone who questions authority as a nutter or a conspiracy nut and all the rest of the endless words associated with everything crazy about anyone who questions. Most people follow that train of thought and it becomes normal to follow the trend, because most people are afraid to go against mass opinion. Of course it will be argued against, with people telling me that they're not closed minded and it's me, or they are strong willed and don't follow basic protocol, etc. The truth is, we all do to certain extents and many do follow what's fed to them as long as it comes with an official stamp of approval.

That's what I see from those that are telling me I'm a lunatic for questioning stuff.

I can't stop you wondering but I can say that I'm absolutely fine, which means absolutely nothing when you consider that we are both just names on a Newcastle united football forum and we do not know each other apart from that, regardless of what you and other might believe you think you know, based on what you derive from my questioning of stuff that you follow without question. All your evidence that you pretend you have is all pointing to you actually having issues, not me. A wolf pack mentality, I'd say. Don't get me wrong though. It doesn't matter who and how many follow the mass opinion on anything authority wise. Like I said before. It's the nature of the beast for people to accept (without real evidence) anything told to them simply because peer pressure to do that, is rife. It's easier to go with the flow than to question it, but it certainly doesn't make going with the flow, correct. Try not to worry about me too much.

No need to worry yourself, I'm fine.

No need to. Take it how you want it.

Two neighbours trying to better each other were boasting one morning. " We're off to Dubai for 3 weeks" said accountant John. " Well we're thinking about having a month in Australia soon enough" said Bob the baker. "I'm thinking of trading my Lexus in for a ranger rover" said John. " Well weirdly I'm thinking of trading my Micra in for a larger car... maybe a large Mercedes" said Bob. John was starting to pretend to get a little irritated because he had to pretend to wonder how Bob was going to manage to do all this and pretend to wonder if he was just lying, so he decided to pretendy test Bob out by asking his young son if any of the stuff Bob said, was the truth. He knew Bob's son was wigging in, so he goes over to Nathaniel and says, " I hear your dad's getting a new car and you're also going to Australia. Are you excited ?" Nathaniel said: " I'm really excited but not as excited as getting our new house on Wynyard estate which is close to where Kevin Keegan's home was." Nathaniel then skipped into his house and ran straight to his mother and said " mam, I've told John a big lie because he tried to ask about dad's boasting about the fictional holiday and car he mentioned." His mam asked: " what exactly did you tell him?" Nathaniel said: "Well I told him that we were moving to a new house on Wynyard estate near where Kevin Keegan used to live." Nathaniel's mother pretended she was fuming at the blatant lies, so she drags Nathaniel down to the local church to see father Bartholomew. Father Bartholomew takes Nathaniel into the confessional box and says:" why are you here, Nathaniel?" Nathaniel says: "I've come for forgiveness for I have sinned. I told lies to my next door neighbour, John about us getting a new house on Wynyard estate near where Kevin Keegan used to live." Father Bartholomew pretended to get really excited and shouted, " Nathaniel, do me a favour and get me Keegan's autograph and any other autographs of famous people on that estate , will you." Nathaniel shouted: " I don't think you quite heard me properly... I said I sinned by telling lies to my neighbour about us getting a house on Wynyard. We aren't really moving to Wynyard." Father Bartholomew shouted, " you what.......youuuuuuuuu bloody what. Are you frigging telling me that you can't get me Keegan's autograph because you lied about getting a house at Wynyard, you little piece of shit." "Yes, that's what I'm telling you, Father" said Nathaniel. Father Bartholomew steps out of the confessional box and says to Nathaniel's mother. " Your son is a little shit house and a lying little bastard and I'm going to kick his fucking head in and smash his face off the side of the confessional box and then I'm going to drag you out by the hair and smash your face off the tarmac in the car park." Nathaniel's mother grabs Nathaniel from the confessional box and shouts " run Nathaniel, run as fast as you can and tell your dad what father Bartholomew has just said." Nathaniel ran for his life, as fast as he could with his mother's voice echoing in his big wing nut like ears but getting fainter as he gained distance. Nathaniel reaches home and hammers loudly on the door for over half an hour before realising his dad was still at the bakery 12 miles away. He asks John if he would give him a lift to the bakery as it was a life of death situation. John refused, so Nathaniel runs all the way to the bakery to find that he took so long, the bakery had closed. Nathaniel's mother knew Nathaniel would do this and she actually planned it all with the next door neighbour, John and Bob, Nathaniel's dad. It turns out that Bob put on a mask and played the role of father Bartholomew so they could run away to Australia together and leave Nathaniel to fend for himself after finding out he supported Sunderland. When Nathaniel found out they'd nashed, he beat John up and smashed up his car and house and then burgled a local convenience store where he held up the shopkeeper with a sawn off baseball bat and was eventually caught and sentenced to serve a full 56 years in broadmoor. The moral of the story is, do not tell daft lies or support Sunderland.

Why the hell do manufacturers put labels in clothes that irritate the hell out of you. They either stick them at the back of the neck or down the side of the item (T-shirt). Why they can't simply put them close to the bottom is puzzling. They must know it irritates the hell out of people, so I can't understand why they don't do something about it, because most people I know just cut the tags off, including myself, which defeats the object of having the tag in the first place, in those positions.

I've never believed the Earth was flat. I simply said it's not a globe that we walk UPON.

I go on what I see and delve into about any of this stuff that is fed to us. A lot of it absolutely begs questions and some of it is blatant, in your face garbage and propaganda. Some of it will naturally be the truth and this is where the acceptance of certain stuff is deemed by me to take a back seat in my mind as for it not to be suspicious enough for it to peak my interest. The key to it all is evidence. It's fine saying something has more evidence for than against, but you have to ask yourself why you are saying that in terms of what is placed before you to give you a stance of saying your thoughts on something are sound because the evidence outweighs anything a person like me can say against it. Basically speaking, many people use mass opinion as evidence. Media video/photo's are deemed perfectly clear proof's, it seems. It's a belief in a system that is designed to make you accept and believe. The silly part of it all is, most people know that the media are a bunch of fabricators and so are governments, etc. The issue only arises when the minority come along and start to pick fault, or potential fault with stuff that the masses are in acceptance of, by simple life time peer pressure through indoctrination. People will refuse to admit they're pressured into belief's because they do not want to appear weak. The issue is, we are all weak and all basically follow protocol, kind of thing. Even me. All I do is step outside of that box and question but it still doesn't make me immune to following set out patterns that 99.9% of us do follow. That really is the nature of the beast that we all are. Of course you have photo's and video and so called eye witnesses and anything else you can add to the mix. What you do not know is, what is the actual truth of any of it. You can accept it (as I said) and just go with the flow, which is fair enough, or you can question some of it if you feel that it doesn't sit right with you. It's fine telling me that you have more evidence than I have that something is more real than fake by producing pictures and video and eye witnesses but then again, I could tell you that the starship enterprise is real because I've got photographs and video of it all and eye witnesses verifying that what I'm saying is the truth. What's the difference? It's easy to say " yeah but that's clearly sci-fi and we are told it is, so it's obviously not real." The point is, what is real in situations like this? Not as easy as it appears to be in defining a truth from a fiction, which is where logic and questioning have to come into it. Most people shun questioning on much of scientific stuff or so called war mongering, in terms of what the reality is against what we are told is a reality. They prefer to simply ponder the ramifications of it all, rather than sit back and think, " hmmmm, are we being played like fiddles here?" What is intellectual honesty in any of this? I'm being honest in that I question. I would be dishonest if I said I knew exactly what the truth of everything is...but I don't. I question stuff and have my own thoughts on what could be and may be happening. The stuff I'm pondering is the stuff that many take a a truth for no other reason than a reliance on authority.

Striving for answers for what?

There seems to be a lot of psychologists on here.

Good result and workout. Naturally there's a bit of rustiness but overall the squad seem to be doing fairly well. Atsu looked decent and Jacob Murphy looks a very good buy. A few things to work on at the back and possibly a decent striker to come in for about 25 million or so, unless Mitrovic finds his feet very quickly. Overall I'd say we will hold our own in the premier league this season and stay clear of any relegation issues. A top 10 place would be a massive bonus and anything higher would be miraculous. Just thinking out loud.

Mitro almost looks half hearted at times. Maybe his fitness isn't quite there yet. Great goal by Ritchie and at least Mitro scored, even if it looked messy. You still have to be in the place to get it and score it and a goal is a goal, regardless. A 1-4 scoreline isn't a bad result for pre-season. As a prediction of course.

Do you?

Accept it or don't but it's there for you to look at if you wish. Also, I don't know your family or friends. Do you know if I have any?

There you go, this kid gets it.

Your question was answered a while back in this topic. Read upon it if you wish. I don't know your family or friends. Do you know if I have any?

You carry on.

There is no lie.

My ice dome is satisfactory to my thoughts pertaining to what I believe Earth is but then again I've already mentioned it all in another topic on here. Read it up again, or not. I'm easy with it. I don't know your family.