wolfy

A taxi controller manages the radios in those taxi's that run around town, do you think he/she knows how they work? You try and use the fact that you monitor radios and such to back up your argument and it backs up nothing except that you can track someone driving about an area. In the 40's , radar could track incoming aircraft. Was this from satellites?

Well why ask?

Being on a plane is being inside a pressurised tin can flying at about 500mph through the air. All the wind speed created by the plane flies over and under it, with you protected by the aluminium skin. The Earth is a solid and we are told to believe it carries with it, the atmosphere at the same speed, yet within that atmosphere, we have another atmosphere that carries clouds and wind in all directions. It's a classic case of being told to believe in magic and making up calculations to fit bullshit. You can use as many put down comments as you want but you are proving absolutely nothing other than following something you were schooled into and accept it unconditionally. I don't.

It's far from ridiculous. But each to their own.

I have a question for you. Why are you bothering to come into a thread asking why anyone is bothering?

I wasn't showing you about the america and Russian space walks, I was showing you this Chinese fake one. There is equal proof of similar with America. Of course, I don't expect you to accept anything , you have your own mind. I'm just glad I'm not easily duped by all this blatant fake rubbish.

This is the Apollo 17 so called ascent from the moon. Now here's a few things to work out (apart from the fact that it looks pathetic haha) The little tea pot takes off from those lander legs and obviously must have a rocket nozzle similar to the one under that lander right? I mean, if the lander has one, surely the teapot take off rocket much have one even if it's a bit smaller right? Not only that but the ascent teapot is blasting it's rocket fuel directly into the engine of the lander rocket motor, which you would think would blow the thing up and certainly should have made some movement on those lander legs with the thrust, even wobbling it, don't you think? Now when the teapot takes off, amid all the little sparklers that we have all used on bonfire night, can anyone see a nozzle or any sign of rocket exhaust ( even if clear) disturbing the lander legs? Now look how fast it takes off, as if it's been yanked by a cable (chuckles) but look underneath it. Does anyone see a nozzle or even any opening for rocket propellant to exit from? Does that little craft look capable of going 3000mph, leaving moons gravity and then finding and docking with the command module? Where did they store the fuel needed? This alone is a blatant insult to anybodies intelligence.

I'd be delighted to. In-fact, I'll even show you one of the lighting used as well.

What physics do you need to understand to know something is as fake as shit? Here's a question for you. Is there anything at all about those moon missions or anything told to you about man made space exploration that doesn't add up, or that you blatantly know it's fake.

What I've done to come to my conclusions is read up and view all of what N.A.S.A claims to have done to get to the moon. If you haven't looked it up, then , as I said before, take some time out and have a look. You can start anywhere but if you start at the beginning from when Kennedy gave that speech of ," We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things. Not because they are easy...but because they are hard" From that speech alone it all becomes silly as it goes on because they didn't have jack shit technology to even contemplate a venture into actual space, never mind a moon mission, yet in 7 years, they managed to figure it all out, yet to this day we cannot figure out how to land a man on the moon and we were (up until a few months ago) hoaxing space shuttle dockings with a fake ISS. Anyway, start from scratch and make your way through everything they supposedly done, right up until the moon missions abruptly stopped and see what you make of it. The choice is entirely up to you whether you choose to or not but it will give you a better insight if you study it all.

Don't get me wrong here. There will always be an answer to any moon hoax findings, as they are not gonna say, "oh damn, we messed up with the remote video thing. There's some clever people out there and clever liars who can lie their way out of any situation no matter how silly it appears. Just like this remote control video on the moon. If people want to believe that someone could operate a video camera to catch something that pops off the moon at speed and follow it perfectly with a time delay, them there's nothing else I can really say lol

I'm too stupid to argue with simply because you cannot argue with me and put much forward except to say I'm too stupid to argue with. I'm not begging you to give me any feedback Fish, that's your choice, so either take part, get wound up or simply use your ignore button or simply bypass my posts. The choice is yours and I'm easy with whatever you choose.

Oh, and Park life makes a good point about these Van Allen radiation belts. Only lately they seem to have discovered that they may be more deadly that they thought, yet they managed to send 6 craft through it with no protection, when calculations were supposedly made by a SCIENTIST who appeared to be the brains of his time said that 4 feet of lead shielding would be needed for man to survive the journey. Apparently it can all be done with baco foil.

Of course they didn't know it was an issue. They didn't know anything about space except what they seen through a telescope, so everything else is a guess and a hope about what's needed to actually venture outside of this atmosphere. I would imagine they thought and thought many many times of how to get into space and even launched the odd rockets aimed at getting into space before realising that, although having a high forehead makes you look clever, it still doesn't solve the space situation. It's probably been pondered and pondered by a pan full of tefal's to this very day and is probably pissing many off that no matter how clever they are on Earth with technology...mother Earth will not allow them any parole to step outside of it. What they can do (for now) is fake shit and as CGI gets better, they can travel further into space. I'm just waiting for the next instalment of this Mars venture, to see the amazing pictures OR findings they pretend is on there. In the 60's and 70's with technology being basically stone age compared to now, N'A'S'A still somehow managed to remote control operate a video camera on the moons surface to precisely film the ascent of the so called lander from the moons surface and track it perfectly into the sky, all by remote control, operated by a bloke in Houston even though there was a delay in time. This alone as many things should be enough to make common sense take over that it's all a load of nob ends and broomsticks lol

Look up the 1969 N.A.S.A, so called footage of them supposedly closing in to land on the moon and go from there. Use all N.A.S.A stuff of consecutive moon video and make your own judgements. It's up to you to decide what to make of it and how believable you think everything is.

There's loads of it, it's pointless me going through it all, just look it all up, it's all there for you. You can make up your own mind when you do a bit of looking and a serious bit of thinking about it all.

Cold welding in a vacuum was recognised in the 1940's before any so called space travel clap trap.

I've gave plenty of evidence that it's faked if you read back. It's up to you to decide what you believe or not as I'm not here to make you choose either way, I'm just saying that after scrutinising footage and watching press conferences , plus astronots getting interviewed I'm 100% sure in my own mind.

You tell me my errors.

Nope! I'm saying only time will tell whether it gets proven to everyone that space travel is a scam.

That's absolutely fine. You're entitled to believe what you believe as we all are, it's just that I know in my own mind after plenty of research and not merely just going along with one theory or another, that the moon landings are a complete hoax and I believe that space travel in it's entirety is a scam. Only time will tell whether it gets proven once and for all, yet I won;t hold my breath. If there was only one or two discrepancies about space travel, I wouldn't be typing anything against it, I would accept it but the fact is, there's not just a few, there's thousands.

For a wind up merchant I'm sure putting some effort into it aren't I. If I wanted to play wind up games, I'm sure I could do it a thousand times easier than this, so here's a little tip for you. Why don't you put me on ignore if I bother you so much?

All those athletes are a credit to themselves and this country. What a fantastic medal haul.

Some of Sid's quotes. 'When Lowe gets back to Clay Cross there'll be a reception like Ayatollah Khomeini had hit town' 'Jocky Wilson, all the psychology of a claymore. As Freud said to Jung in Vienna, you can psych up too much for a darts match. 'Cliff Lazarenko's idea of exercise is a strong pull on a soda siphon.' Commentating on Eric Bristow "The congregation is restless and the High Priest is at the oche" "When Alexander of Macedonia was 33, he cried salt tears because there were no more worlds to conquer... Bristow's only 27."[8] "We couldn't have more excitement if Elvis walked in and asked for a chip sandwich."[9][10] "Bristow reasons . . . Bristow quickens ... Aaah, Bristow."[9] "Bob came on like the Laughing Cavalier..now he looks like Lee Van Cleef on a bad night" 'Wade is like a man trying to eat candy floss in a Hadron Collider.' "He's not just an underdog, he's an underpuppy." – Assessment of Keith Deller's chances of winning the 1983 Embassy World Darts final against Bristow. Deller won.[11] "That was like throwing three pickled onions into a thimble."[8] "Look at the man go, it’s like trying to stop a water buffalo with a peashooter."[8] "He's hitting that lipstick like an outsourced Avon lady" "Taylor's opponents appear to be merely cutting with spoons in his wake." "As the Liverpool marker said ... You'll never chalk alone" 2012 'Yesterday...all my doubles seemed so far away...2012 'Taylor could land a Boeing 747 on a kayak.'2012 'This Ozzie has more hair than Rapunzel...and is letting it down.'2012 'This is Sargeant Taylor's Only Darts Club Band...2012 'I've just left Bon Jovi's dressing room and I'm living on a tungsten prayer.' 2012

Nothing disproves my theory from what you have said. Absolutely nothing! Cold welding in a vacuum was done on EARTH not in space and they had to overcome that to get into space and guess what, they didn't overcome it in 1969 but managed the moon mission anyway eh? That's just one small snippet of why they didn't go among thousands. Oh and I have a question for you. What made you believe the moon landings were real ?