wolfy

Have you ever seen an atom?Can you prove an atom exists?

Fish: A lot of science is unseen but the theories behind it are there on paper. It's down to the individual to go with what's written and told or to look for an alternative. Most go with what's written because that's what everyone in any one country is taught to go with and frowned upon if they dare challenge it. The same goes for religion. You are conditioned to believe in 'a God' who you have never seen but it's all written. Challenge it and you are frowned upon.

Your last words are bang on.Now equate that to what you were taught at school about moon landings and the spinning Earth and the tailored to fit calculations to fit it, all told to you by an adult not unlike your own parents who you trust to give you the knowledge. You are taught to believe in God and have religious studies, so are brought up to believe, unless your parents are atheist's, so what would happen then? which way would you go then if your parents told you there was no God yet the school tells you there is? Are all religions correct or are only some , whilst others are a conspiracy? Food for thought isn't it. You have decided that I tell my kids that what they learn at school is bogus, yet you have no clue whatsoever how many kids I've got or whether they are kids at all, so who's dishing out conspiracy theories here without evidence. Should I be worrying about you for having these thoughts? I would suggest (if you want to, I'm not egging you on or nothing) that you stop worrying about me and my family and concentrate on your own well being, whilst also making an argument for or against what we are talking about and try and simply come to a conclusion that I'm wrong, plausible or possibly right and that's the choices you only really need to be bothered about, if at all. Don't fret over things, it's bad for you. Smile while you debate.

We will be far better prepared for this season due to Pardew having the balls to turn players into versatile players. This season, those players will be better off for the experience and will be far more comfortable if and when they get slung into the fold. For all a section of fans had Raylor down as mediocre, he's done s sterling job, mostly at left back but has played right back, right mid and centre mid in latter stages of games and covered well. Perch is another player who has been given a new lease in various positions and rarely let us down. Jonas, has played left back, centre mid and occasionally right mid in small doses, as well as his main left mid position. These 3 players are an example of Pardew having the trust in his squad and knowing who can switch position in times of suspension or injury.

You have said nothing personal to me. I'm fine with any diagnosis you make, just as long as you don't charge me for your services.

False move, if that's the case, send down for a few tankers full of fuel for your moon journey in your non vacuum. Check mate.

Well it's common sense to know a rocket hasn't been in it then isn't it.lol

That's just my way of describing how it appears to work based on what I see. What's your take on it?

It is! It's just got a bit of fart in it that's all.

How many people do you see on mobility scooters and in mobility cars and those out at the pub on disability top rate benefit. I bet a lot of you have seen this and know a good few that's milking the system. To receive this benefit, you either have to be disabled enough to qualify, which is fair enough if that was the case. The problem is, it's more an audition for the benefit now, a little bit like Britain's got talent and Simon Cowell and the panel are the DSS judges. A relatively fit person who has his audition at a set time, will get out of bed, have his breakfast, then practice his ailment, whether that's the side walking limping adult following the local jazz band or the talk whilst wheezing, bent over flustered look, e.t.c. Once the practice is done, then he will set off on a pair of ready at the door walking sticks and off to the DSS audition. Simon: Hi and what's your name? Claimant: I'm Fred! Simon: Ok and what are you going to do for us today? Claimant: Well I'm going to perform a wheezing routine with a round of coughs, followed by a blood pressure rising look with a finishing performance of a wobble and collapse into a chair. Simon: Ok, you have 2 minutes, off you go. Claimant: (does his routine) Simon: I have to say , you were brilliant, just brilliant, it's a yes from me. Amanda: What Simon said, it's a yes from me. Piers: Congratulations Fred, it's 3 yes's, collect your disability book. Next up, is little 62 year old Edna who is struggling to get off her chair due to severe arthritis in her knees, hips and fingers, who can barely walk, yet stifles any whimpers and forces herself to walk on stage in front of the panel refusing any help from people and preferring to use her sticks. Simon: Right! Who's next. Edna: Hi simon. Simon: How old are you Edna? Edna: I'm 62 Simon! Simon: Ok Edna and what are you going to do for us today? Edna: I'm going to try and walk 10 feet then turn around and pick up a full cup of tea and take a sip, all without crying out in pain. Simon: Ok Edna, you have two minutes. Edna: (does the walk and picks up the cup ready to drink) Simon: WAHHHHHHHHHH. Amanda: WAHHHHHHHH. Piers: WAHHHHHHHH. Simon: Sorry Edna, you got 3 X'S , nice try, maybe try again next year. Aye, this system is totally bolloxed up isn't it and isn't based on real disability, it's based on who's the best actor/ess. Those genuine one's that qualify appear to have to have a week left to live, whilst crawling to the panel and still hope for the best. Does this make anyone cringe and has anyone got someone living near them who are real genuine cases who deserve help but get none and also how many people do you know who's a potential soap star disability actor/ess?

Society is turning a fair amount of people into twisted evil bastards. When I say society, I mean what society has become with violence and murder as the norm. Years ago when someone was murdered , especially in your region, it was pure shock to most people, yet now it barely gets a mention unless the murderer in on the loose, because we have become conditioned to it and accept it as the norm. Years ago when kids were right little bastards they were clipped round the lug and labelled as unruly. Today , authorities drag the parents in to tell them that their little bastard unruly little shit isn't actually a bad little bastard, it's because he has ADHD and needs an arm round him and a few pairs of top range trainers, plus trackies, trips to the fun fair, all expenses paid bus outings and blah blah blah. These type of kids usually end up leaving school or reform school and hang about near your home creating as much shit as possible before eventually using a pensioners head as a football. Once in court, they are told that their crime is despicable but understand that they have had issues in life that prison would not cure, so they are slapped on the wrist and told to do a few gardens for a few hours a week and everything will be ok. The evil is ingrained into them now because they have had their taste of violence and blood of the weak and will look for more as the next rage sets in. These people have no fear of the law because they hold spats with the law as a badge of honour to their equally backward mates. It's all down to intelligence levels dropping, which many believe are rising because of technology, yet it's technology that's creating the monsters and the sub standard intelligence. Young potential offenders don't concentrate on bettering their intelligence, the concentrate on the loop holes in the law and the understanding that adults will be prosecuted should they lay a finger on them. The major problem in latter teen years is the use of drugs which basically wipes out any chance of progress for 90% of those who get hooked and even the most timid person who falls into the drug culture would violently rob their own Granny for the sake of a fix and think nothing of it until they come down from their high, only to be so remorseful for what they done, yet would cheerfully rob the same Granny the very next night. We are all basically harbouring evil, it's just the trigger mechanism inside us that requires firing. How many people have walked past a lovely neighbour who says hello every morning and stops and sensibly chats to you and appears to the so placid that a loud boo could topple him, yet have a dispute over something he feels is his and the incredible hulk shines through. It's just how far the trigger is pulled back as to how long it is before we hear the bang.

Basically that's about right lol

I believe that everyone has a breaking point and also everyone has a weakness , it just depends on who or what can break a person and who is clever enough to exploit a weakness in a person. Some people can allow emotion to flow and women are pretty quick to show emotion at the drop of a hat, where most men bottle theirs up which is why a placid man can become an instant violent person if he's bottled up a lot of emotion in his life which is triggered by someone or something. We all know women have the potential to kill if provoked when they are due on. Generally circumstances can dictate how a person will turn out, yet some people are simply evil from the word go. The one good thing about the human body is, it's built to survive and a persons mind is normally geared to self preservation unless it's altered due to circumstances which could be drugs, depression, revenge or something along those lines.

It's not Newtonian physics I don;t appreciate, it's N.A.S.A bullshit I don't appreciate.

Anything that scientists don;t want you to know about, they invent equations that are so complicated that people just accept it because they cannot fathom or even dare attempt to fathom out how these work, so they just go along with what they are told.

But it does push against the atmosphere plus the gravity which people do not take into account and just go with the bullshit that you throw the ball against nothing as if it's in a vacuum. When you jump up , gravity pulls you back down. If you throw a medicine ball for instance, you throw it against the atmosphere whilst gravity immediately is acting upon your throw and that's why you move a little bit in the opposite direction. In a vacuum, you don't have anything acting upon you at all. It's nothing and you weigh nothing in space.

What was the motive for them to supposedly do it 6 times?

If they really did do it in 1969, there should be housing estates on the moon now lol

Mathematics is also the language of bullshit where space science is concerned, depending on what they require us to believe.

What millions of witnesses seeing it glide? The shuttle that lands is just a jet under power. Why don;t you bring up some footage and listen to it landing. If it was a glider , it would be quiet but if they need to disguise anything they have a jet that follows it in so no one knows it's under power. N.A.S.A aren't stupid, they just know how to bullshit.

The ice is the vacuum of space?You have it all mixed up. I understand Newtons law, on EARTH, in space it means absolutely nothing and the ice is certainly not the vacuum. If you were sat on the same chair in the same ice rink with a bottle of compressed air and opened the valve, away from you, you would move in the opposite direction because the air is pushing against the atmosphere. The atmosphere is a barrier. Try picking up a 4 by 4 sheet of ply board and running with it . The atmosphere or air pressure acts upon you. If could stand on a floor in a vacuum and run with the same ply board you would simply run with no resistance. Also a rocket does not shoot balls out of it nozzle, it simply burns fuel which would get swallowed up in the atmosphere and would be like you running on a treadmill, you would expend your energy but would go nowhere.

Ok mate, I'm laughing but if you believe that then that's fair do's.

1. The ball would go where you threw it2. The chair would move backwards a little bit.

What's that?

Forget the equations, simple logic is all that's needed to know a rocket would not work in a vacuum.