Rayvin

Depressing game - also utterly awful game - but we need a two decent goalscorers in the summer. Remy could be one, not that he'd stay. De Jong can replace Shola in the ineffective holding the ball up role, and we can replace Cisse. We'll need to replace Colo, and we need to replace Cabaye. That's a fair size rebuilding job...

Sunderland have two games in hand anyway, a point is probably ok for them sadly...

That doesn't get way from the fact that we'd have scored at least once and probably twice if Remy was playing where Cisse or De Jong are. Had we replaced Cabaye, or kept him, I honestly think we'd probably have won 3 or 4-0.

Well it's hard to argue they don't deserve that. I reckon our all round play has warranted a goal as well, we're just utterly impotent up front without Remy.

Haha that's actually hilarious. Goaline tech saving us there.

Isn't that what we've got Hawkeye for?

...this better not use up our luck for the rest of the season...

Can De Jong actually shoot...?

I was expecting that we'd not be seeing cross field passes that go straight out of play, miles away from other players. That's Fulham rather than us, but even so.

This match is hilariously bad.

De Jong passing it to their keeper...

Dummett is not the answer for our set pieces, like.

Needs a goal by us really. If Fulham score it'll be more of this, but if we do they'll have to go for it. Crap match though, so far.

Colo playing well, which is good cos Fulham do look up for this to be fair to them.

Hope springs eternal.

Yep, there's Hull bad, and then there's West Brom bad... 1-0 down already.

Hull were very poor - but I doubt they'll go down. The whole standard of the league this year is pretty terrible. The bottom half of the table is utter balls.

This is pretty much how this thread is going to go for the next few months and 50 pages isn't it?

Pilot could have bailed I guess. Interesting theory anyway about Freescale anyway - Parky would love it.

I dunno, I think Fulham are gone. It's the teams above Sunderland that we want to put some points together. Also it'd be utterly depressing to lose to a team as bad as Fulham. I dunno where it went wrong for them but they've been horrific of late.

It's possible I guess, although it would definitely be targeted at the Chinese if it was terrorism. There are a reasonable number of Chinese 'terrorist' groups, but they're all very low tech. This would be a huge step up - although it follows a few days on from that mass stabbing in a train station that (supposedly) was carried out by separatists.

Thing is, surely they'd go for an actual target, rather than just allowing the plane to go down in some unspecified location. Why not slam it into something? If the terrorists were undisturbed by the passengers during 5 hours of flying off course, I doubt they'd have been interrupted in a repeat of 9/11. I don't think it was terrorists. It's not like any group has claimed it either, which defeats the whole point.

Have finally finished all of mine forever, so I can look at posts like this with an element of schadenfreude. ...Sorry!

Grand Theft Auto supports this assertion I think it's about flying lower than obstructive objects (like mountains and stuff). Not sure if it's applicable on the sea. Saying that, radar has a range and this plane was way out at sea wasn't it?

Fuck sake, you've been in the wars... Lost vision for an hour though, that sounds bad.