Rayvin

That sucks...are you sure it wasn't something else in the sandwich though? I've never heard of a pork allergy before (not saying it isn't possible though). You can get beef sausages for what it's worth.

I would take that in a heartbeat. Shanghai is an amazing city, and £150,000 per week is a lot of money...

Love you too, man.

I'm not sure if anyone has asked this, but what's with your wallpaper? Also that image is too small to see. Did you know?

I approve of the new direction this thread has taken.

Can Santon not play right back? I thought he could play either side.

Agreed, it's foolish. Unless they have some evidence for a potentially higher footfall other than current attendances.

I think a lot of what you've set out makes sense. I'd still be keen for us to get another striker over the line though as even with Ings we're looking a bit light there. Plus we're probably going to be selling Perez on in the January window next year. If we get Garde then maybe we could go in for Lacazette. Unlikely I know, but there we are. Definitely agree on moving Tiote on and Caulker would be a good step up on Williamson for sure. Would we pay his wages though?

Surely that's it for Carver.

Fully agree with this...

Not only is he behind the defender, he's in his own fucking half when it's played That's criminal.

Maybe Carver has learned from last time out that hoofball with Perez is a waste of time.

We aren't shit, it's just a new manager bounce. Ride it out, they'll be shit soon.

I'm not going to say definitively cos the truth is I don't know, but surely Bluetooth would be able to do what you're talking about. Perhaps try googling that?

Kind of agree that the next six months is our best chance to get anything decent for Cisse. A good player mind, on the whole, but probably is time to move him on. That said, it'd be nice to have some other serious strikers before we do.

Convincing to be fair. And surely this can only be good news? If he's wiped £40m off the debt, that's a good amount of it gone. I know we'd rather the team got it, but the if the priority is Ashley leaving, this is a good sign.

That's the Guardian through and through though. I don't think they even believe all the stuff they come up with, they just know it stirs up a good number of clicks.

That can't be right, we can't have a profit of £52m/year surely?

I mean, supposedly 10 clubs were interested. How many of them would have paid him more than £30k/week on the other hand...

Doubt Arsenal need him. What for? They have Giroud and Welbeck. Palace probably would want him but I don't think he'd go to them before us, even with our managerial issues. Schalke and Dortmund maybe.

With Cisse going the other way? I thought they were interested in him...

Ok sounds good, but will Charnley have noticed/be at all concerned?

At least he's better to look at than Blatter whose face looks like it's in constant danger of sliding off...

How good is that lad from Notts Forest supposed to be then? Is he the answer in defense?