Rayvin

There's a decent chance that Liverpool could get sucker punched out today if we're lucky...

Our crossing hasn't been great either in fairness. This is kind of our problem in a nutshell. We need teams to go for us so that we can take them apart. Breaking them down isn't working very well for us.

Well you joined us in a shaky spell... we've been dominant save for the last 5 mins or so.

... the fuck was that Gouffran

Shelvey has had a good game tbf.

If we concede I reckon they'll lock us out of the game based on that. If we score first this is over.

Diame is trying to shoot every time he gets the ball - if our plan for today is shooting from range, it doesn't seem to be working. That said, we're playing fairly well despite our inability to fashion any real chances of note.

Waste of a freekick that...

Playing fairly well so far but the shots from distance game isn't working.

FFS I thought it was an interesting article

I suppose you're right about the volumes, it's just that it's not really looking at the number of copies sold, it's the number of new products released in each Sub. That said the logic would still stand anyway. I'll run it all in tomorrow and see where I get, thanks for that. I've spent the whole day working on pulling all of this together so it's quite possible that I've overlooked something more simple than where I ended up. Cheers again.

This is true. Which is more problematic is the question though. I'd say political Islam is the thing that gives us terrorism, not that you can have one without the other.

I have one I could do with some help on please. I'm developing a pricing matrix for a new line of products we're looking at putting out, and am trying to give a projected average sale price based on historical evidence from a similar product range. For each product I have 6 different subdivisions, and my historical analysis looks at what proportion of the overall number of products fall into each subdivision. So for instance, Subdivision A represents 2% of the overall number of products released in the past year, SubDiv B represents 15% and so on. Each subdivision is priced differently. So the %ages all come up to 100% obviously. I want to provide an average sale price across all subdivisions, with the average taking into account the proportional split of the subdivisions. Can anyone advise how this can be done simply? My brain keeps wanting to just multiply the percentages into the prices, add them all up and then average in the normal way, but that obviously won't work

That remark was even more telling than his original one IMO.

Fair enough - this drink you're trying does sound nice as well, tbf.

I thought you were teetotal. Your body is a temple and all that? Yoga? Chakras?? What happened to you man...

I think HF is radicalising toonotl as we speak.

God, the forum is bitchy today.

Battlefield

As a useful additional point, it's possible that people like Breivik are in fact radicalised by stances like those of the Guardian's - which can be very intolerant if you don't fit into the correct gender or racial identity. Breivik's mother was a moderate feminist who prevented him from seeing his father - no doubt he struggled against mainstream liberal views for some considerable amount of time, seeing a number of hypocritical stances and so on. Given that his attack was on progressives and not Muslims, I think that there likely is something in this.

Hang on though, I only included it because it seems to explain an element of right wing terrorism, and I thought it might broaden the debate away from just Islam - not because I necessarily believe that people are being radicalised. I loathe those aspects (that you cite) of the Guardian as much as the next person and am on record stating this all over the US election thread. That doesn't mean they don't sometimes raise some interesting points though, and it is important to engage with these in order to develop a fuller understanding of our own worldviews, surely? But fair enough if you don't think they're being radicalised. Breivik clearly was (self radicalised I would wager) but he does in effect pre-date the more conventional Alt-Right. He was a full blown political terrorist whose views are entirely in line with the current Alt-Right though. He wasn't declared insane and had a manifesto explaining his motives (which I have attempted to read but it's about 150 pages long and not easy bedtime reading). I just found it interesting.