Rayvin

Not even that young.

I can't remember any reason to hate Nottingham Forest... it's hard to keep up with these things though. Was it just the Lansbury bollocks earlier this season?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/09/ecuador-julian-assange-embassy-notice-eviction Looks increasingly likely that Assange will be either evicted from or walk out of the Ecuadorian embassy. 4 and a half years is an impressive stint of self imprisonment. He has some mental toughness about him.

You're actually kinda selling it there...

Nah she's not that kind of character. More a paranoid, crazy mothering figure. Well acted though.

The guardian doesn't perform too well there. Also, who put that together. I'd agree with it mostly but curious nonetheless.

That has to be a skill of sorts tbf. I wish I could do that

I'd also be interested in your solution.

It'll be interesting to see how the Tories spin it though. That jibe about Labour needing an alternative leader though Desperation from May, she clearly had no idea about this.

Corbyn actually landed a blow on May today Sweetheart deals for Tory councils are apparently taking place. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/08/jeremy-corbyn-accuses-may-of-sweetheart-deal-surrey-council-tax

I think we should be ok for this one. The points about counterattacking and Wolves sitting back do suggest we'll have some difficulty, but Rafa should be able to work past this.

This is a bit surprising, but then I was also a bit stunned when half the German team retired after winning the World Cup. Hard to argue he isn't one of the greats though, at least for Germany.

The BBC does exceptional documentaries, no complaints there. I don't watch any of the other programming so I can't comment on those. Including Hans Zimmer on this project was a masterstroke. I went to see him in concert last year and it was probably the best live event I've ever been to. The only complaint I have with the BBC's wildlife programming is that it flits around too much these days. When I was young I used to watch Wildlife on 2 religiously. It would dedicate a full half an hour to a single species, and I really felt like I was learning a lot. In these more modern day documentaries, they're spending about 3-4 minutes per animal. I get why they do this, to appeal to a broader audience (and because the series' they're doing have a much broader scope), but I miss the old format too.

Think the statute of limitations might apply on that one

That sounds awesome actually, I really have to finish the series off.

It was in the fallout of the Tory porn ban It's one of the things they took off us. Not that it's one of my go to themes, but it's mainstream enough that it was worth noting at the time

I haven't actually, I'm about half-way through that series at the moment. I'll look forward to it though. I think I heard about this anyway though in the papers at one point. Was the idea that the sides of buildings will be entirely covered in plants or something to that effect?

Amazed you don't have establishment in there...

:lol: Agree with basically all of it... squirting though? Don't rememb--oh wait, yeah. And I've only mentioned libertarians in response to HF and Parky

Admittedly I only see the Alt-Right through one specific channel (Milo, Breitbart, etc) but I think a substantial part of it was formed through internet counter culture and resistance to political correctness (and i note the title of that skit is political incorrectness, but even so). Islamophobia is another key aspect. I've not seen as much from them about big government. I do think they're distinct from the tea party. I'm not even sure how patriotic the Alt Right are, I think they're about cultural identity rather than national. But obviously, I only look at them through one lens.

Um... I would have said it traces right back to Thatcher and Reagan instituting Neoliberalism more than some guy laughing at some people being killed. Why do you think this is the moment?

Is it a stand up routine he's doing at City Hall, or is it political commentary? The latter might be funnier.

It's a nice idea, a vertical city. If it was done without 60s monolithic crap.

Yeah the whole thing continues to be a farce. The best Labour can hope for is that their amendments are ignored and the resulting deal is so shit that the public tear the Tories a new one. Or that economic armageddon is on the horizon if we get no deal at all. This whole process has to be one of the biggest, costliest wastes of time that this country has ever embarked upon.

Starmer is considered to be a good choice for the party generally, but is he 'on the left'? He might be, but I don't know. I expect he'll be who the established leftwing (Guardian) press throw their weight behind. Unless a woman runs anyway. That said, maybe it would shut the progressives up if we did have a 'left wing' female candidate running. Which would be fine if she had the same sorts of ideas as Sanders or Corbyn.