Rayvin

I think it should be exactly what you've set out - They've already lost the people prepared to let immigration become an issue as they've maintained their view that immigration is positive for the country as a whole throughout all of this, so they have little further to lose there. Corbyn will have some traction with the working class, those intelligent enough to actually listen to what he's saying. But that said, they may be an absolute write off, and we'll have to hope that they aren't motivated to turn out in the same numbers as they did for the referendum. Things that might be relevant: 1 - Will the working class swallow their tribalism and vote Tory? 2 - Will the north? 3 - Will UKIP be able to mount a viable campaign? They didn't seem pleased by this announcement. 4 - Can Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP find common ground? Ideally, I would want all resources for each party to be thrown into the seats they can take off the Tories rather than each other. The Lib Dems attack on the MIddle England front and Labour try to consolidate what they can in the North and urban centres. SNP just repeat what they've managed in Scotland.

I think the Noelie threat level prediction is a nice touch actually. It's going to be unpleasant if we lose and Huds win, mind.

So you made an account back in 2007 and just remembered us, 10 years on Mackem or not, that's actually quite impressive.

If we got him involved, on stage with Corbyn, Labour would be unstoppable.

Fine, they can rebrand it. Call it the 'People's Brexit' or something. They could demonstrate that those who want Hard Brexit are rich landowners in the country who will either benefit or will be fine with it as they're rich enough to cope. Other the fuck out of the hard Brexiters.

Which is fine because actually, that's what it'll take to win it. Soft Brexit allows for the will of the people nonsense to be maintained while also ensuring that basically nothing changes - which is what we want. Surely 52% of the country didn't vote for cutting ALL ties with Europe, and if no party is going to go for a reversal, the Remainers will go for the least bad option.

I think the best we can hope for is that they have a good rethink over the next few days. That speech was all soundbites, it sounds as though it's caught them cold.

That speech is horrific. EDIT - although he's right about the austerity narrative, that is indeed why they lost last time.

Pick whichever one is most likely to win between Libs and Labour if how we leave the EU is a priority to you, vote Green if you're just sick of all of them, I'd say. I'm going to vote Labour if they're able to make clear that they're going for a inbetweeny Brexit. If they faff around and avoid saying anything of substance, I'll go Lib Dem.

Disagree, but only because I don't think Brexit was actually about Brexit. It was a pressure venting exercise and a general lashing out at the establishment IMO. I don't know if I see the same sorts of people who voted for that, coming out to support the sitting government in achieving it's aims. Entirely different proposition. They'd be backing the establishment, not attacking it.

There's plenty of people on here who believe that, it shouldn't be hard.

FFS.

Not sure about returning to its principles, but he was supposed to shake things up and move them leftwards. All of this he did, but Brexit has killed him off. Without Brexit, what would the Tories have used to reach out to people desperate for change?

You're assuming turnout is the same. It won't be, and it won't be in favour of Remain. That said, you're otherwise right - that coalition needs to exist in principle even if not in a formal sense. I would add that they can take the middle road of single market access which the vast majority of Remainers would accept, and potentially a decent number of Brexiters.

True, but only because I haven't sat down and devised a system that disproportionately benefits my score predictions ahead of everyone else's

I also suspect that her claim that the decision was made recently is true. I genuinely don't think she's a smart politician, just an opportunistic one. This could literally all be down to the polls.

Maybe because there's no hope of concluding things within that timeframe anyway? And also I guess because if she didn't, the Tories would have a weaker hand going into the election.

Yes but if Huddersfield win and we lose, then they stand a chance of ratcheting up the pressure on us. I think both teams will be going for it equally.

I admire your optimism on the Fulham result mind. Can see Huddersfield winning that myself...

You reckon? It'll be interesting to see their manifesto.

Let's hope he switches back to the team that played Leeds.

We should start a new politics thread just so that he can't communicate through avatar anymore.

I see CT has paid us another visit. Parky, out of interest, whose side are you on in this?

If May loses this, there'll be no living with Parky.

At least they'd be fighting for them with UKIP, a party who you would think has to go all out. Maybe they can poison the well against the Tories a bit...