Rayvin

It's gonna be interesting to see what the papers make of it. Do you think it's going to be a massive talking point or just a headline?

To point it out? How does the notion of stopping it from happening again grab you? Very similar thing happened in Libya and, it could be argued, nearly happened (if not for Miliband) in Syria. At some point we need to stop fucking with other countries.

Corbyn backed by an editorial in the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/26/jeremy-corbyn-manchester-british-foreign-policy Also criticised for making political capital out of Manchester though, which I'm inclined to agree with also. As 'slight' as it is, the reference to policing is there.

...are you on shrooms today Parky?

We can't control the ideology, we can control our foreign policy. But yes, you're right - we've done this before and it's pointless to redo it. You're also right about people still experiencing an emotional reaction to the event - they'll just want to blame the Muslims. Let's just hope that they understand what he's saying, and see that he's offering more police and security than the Tories are.

You literally just said:

He honestly doesn't. It's staggering.

It is a good point, agreed. I would suggest that we're all considered 'the same' in the eyes of the Islamists but to be brutally honest, Sargon isn't wrong about his views on this either. That said, when it has suited him in the past, he has blamed our foreign policy also.

I know, but Gloom hates him and I want to make nice after being involved in another bout of media bashing

Sargon is rattled Which I'm loving.

Well no, I don't want Labour to incompetently manage the economy either I would far rather that their plans were costed appropriately. Hopefully it's a case of promising the earth and then just achieving what they can once in. i.e. politics as normal.

That's interesting, I'll have a look at that.

Don't panic just yet. Corbyn genuinely seems to know what he's doing at the moment, and I'm actually quite sure that the same people who want to reject immigration also call for us to abandon wars in foreign countries. He's arguably speaking across the aisle here.

They just need to stop a Tory majority, it's not that inconceivable. Depends on Gloom and the rest of the press at this point I'd say

Yep. And CT is our barometer for the man on the street remember

Yeah fair enough. I'm not disagreeing that it could well cost him (although let's be realistic here, the fact that Labour are actually in the conversation at all now is in defiance of what the naysayers have claimed for the past two years). All I'm saying is that I personally respect his decision to refuse to play the media's game. He's showing that actually, the media aren't as powerful as they think they are. I don't think that headline will cost him the election - I don't think he'll win it anyway. So he may as well stay true to his principles.

I'm not in a fucking echo chamber, I spend most of my days reading news that contradicts everything I believe I just asked a question about where your info was coming from. Apparently it's from your gut. How about this from the same article: On domestic policy, Mr Corbyn will say: "To keep you and your family safe, our approach will involve change at home and change abroad. "At home, Labour will reverse the cuts to our emergency services and police. Once again in Manchester, they have proved to be the best of us. "Austerity has to stop at the A&E ward and at the police station door. We cannot be protected and cared for on the cheap. "There will be more police on the streets under a Labour Government. And if the security services need more resources to keep track of those who wish to murder and maim, then they should get them." If this message isn't getting through, and I'm reluctant to say this, it's because the media are deliberately focusing attention elsewhere. I remain steadfast on this - telling the fucking truth about our foreign policy and its consequences is absolutely necessary, should be praised, and is entirely in keeping with who Corbyn is. If it costs him, it costs him. But he couldn't do anything else.

"That assessment in no way reduces the guilt of those who attack our children. Those terrorists will forever be reviled and held to account for their actions. "But an informed understanding of the causes of terrorism is an essential part of an effective response that will protect the security of our people that fights rather than fuels terrorism. "We must be brave enough to admit the 'war on terror' is simply not working. We need a smarter way to reduce the threat from countries that nurture terrorists and generate terrorism." Don't see what is wrong with this. EDIT - I see he's also planning to put 20,000 more officers on the street. Which should also poll well.

I dunno, he'll win attention of the anti-interventionists with that. And they tend to be Kippers. He's also 100% correct IMO. Especially in this case. Where is your assessment that the public mood is that we should keep burying our heads in the sand coming from? Was it polled?

I wonder if other football forums have threads about miscreant players that end up where this one has, or if it's just us.

Well no, but his family hasn't been dragged into it, he's not been outed as an enemy of the state yet.... I dunno, I'm convinced there are depths that the Mail hasn't yet plumbed. They always seem to find a way to go further.

Mother of God is a good one. As for the Arsenal video, it's beyond shameful I do kind of like AFTV though. You get the feeling they're all taking themselves pretty seriously as well

Is this your new favourite expression

Here's where the knives will come out though...

The cringe of this. What a fuckwit...