Rayvin

In which case my argument collapses. Well played

Not what I said. FFS Parky. Whether it happens to Muslim girls was not Wolfy's premise. You're trying to send this off down a channel that makes sense to argue about, which I understand because Wolfy's original position is unsustainable - but his original comment indicated that Muslim laws/rules/influence were affecting HIM. Is Wolfy a Muslim girl?

That isn't what we're discussing though - the issue here is that Wolfy feels that he and his family are having rights/liberties taken away by rising levels of Islamification. I'll readily agree that religious courts in this country should be abolished, but they have absolutely no impact on you or I in terms of how we live our lives.

Are these Christian schools? Non-denominational state schools aren't religious anyway, so what difference does it make if they don't have a nativity play? I don't see the power creep of Islam that you're seeing. I could see an argument to suggest that it's blending with feminism on some matters (women covering up, crack downs on sexual freedoms, removing ads about being beach body ready in the London tube, etc) but these are minor details in the overall scheme of things.

The EDL appear to have been set up in response to Muslim gangs on Luton though - I can understand the logic of where they came from. Obviously they've morphed into something entirely different, but if you look back at where they came from, it very much does appear that communities in the area had become segregated and that race relations were very poor. That's not just on the EDL. UKIP are just racist in the old fashioned sense - the EDL come from a direct example of a failure of integration.

So you think that on this specific issue I have stockholm syndrome, but that I'm worse than you on targeting SJWs elsewhere Just on the Christmas point, I've seen literally nothing to suggest it is being eroded by foreign cultures. Plenty to suggest it's being eroded by consumerism though. As for Sharia councils, my understanding is that their judgements don't/can't supercede the law. So again, what difference do they make? Are you likely to be summoned to one? If not, how does it affect you?

Wolfy, the difference is that we live in a Western liberal democracy, while those other countries are backwards theocracies. So another way of looking at this is that Muslims (for instance) aren't allowed to do the same stuff as we would do here in Saudi Arabia either. But they are allowed to do the same stuff as us in the UK. Because we are liberal. We are not being persecuted here. I celebrate Christmas every year, and a couple of years back was invited to share the day with a Hindu family who had a tree, turkey, stuffing and curried potatoes I suspect plenty of non-white/non-ancestrally British families celebrate Christmas. Has anyone actually told you that you can't celebrate Christmas?

It's only cos Parky recommended almost every one of his posts in the sheeple thread because he found it amusing initially. We're now all rueing the monster that he made.

As good news as that is, I wish they'd not revealed it. May will use it to galvanise people to vote for her...

Thanks mate, interesting news. As an aside, assuming the SNP clean up in Scotland, is 35% plus whatever the Lib Dems get enough to prevent a Tory majority when it comes to seats?

If it's both, eventually, they'll choose between them.

So you think there's a further category who can recognise that someone like Corbyn is needed in principle, but are too scared to vote for it because it's new and different. I actually think you might have a point there.

Where's that approval rating bit from?

People voted for Brexit out of desperation as much as small mindedness. For me, the whole thing comes down to this: Are people desperate, angry and wanting change, or are they just small minded racists. If it's the former, eventually we'll win. If the latter then agreed, we're fucked.

@Dr Gloom If they don't this time, 5 more years of the Tories will have them desperate enough to do so. Falling living stands and wealth inequality pretty much guaranteed with the Tories after all.

Who is Corbyn not speaking to? From your past posts, I can only conclude it's people who value a return to British Imperialism and the associated patriotism, over the opportunity to make themselves better off. Oh and anyone earning above £80k who doesn't have a conscience. If that's a sufficiently large proportion of the electorate to lose an election, then we're fucked no matter who is running the thing - the Labour leader who could appeal to such people wouldn't be able to resolve any of the problems. We'll see I suppose, but there should really be something in the Labour manifesto for everyone. Moreso than I've ever seen from Labour before.

The Lib Dems appear to be a big letdown, agreed. I was hoping they'd take about 20 seats back from the Tories due to losing them last time. Unfortunately though, they don't appear to have a very strong sense of where the public mood is. Let's hope they can turn it around.

Yep, while sympathetic to HF's point, this is an own goal by Labour. Nothing stopping them from having the numbers on paper in front of them. The Tories will be able to use this, and that's the problem.

This didn't sound like it went well. Annoyingly. The presenter is coming under fire for being overly aggressive about it but at the end of the day, this is the sort of thing he should be ready for from radio and tv personalities that he's about to make poorer.

Means we're all better represented though. Even though I accept it fortifies UKIP (as finished as I think they are).

The battleground has moved though, and the Tories seem to know it. If they keep forcing their agenda, and we dig our heels in on Corbynesque policies, eventually the battle will be won. The only long term hope the Tories have is that idealists such as myself cave in, or they move to the left. Eventually, a Corbyn style Labour government will get in, ideally implement proportional representation (properly) and then the Tories are doomed.

The civil service run the country, all politicians do is aim them at things. Agreed on Abbott, she's a liability. But then look at Johnson. We have utterly shit politicians for an utterly shit time.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/29/election-centre-ground-left-labour-tory-manifestos "Whatever the outcome, this election has forced the centreground to the left"

At the risk of falling down the rabbit hole, I'm tempted to say that the left have been divisive also. Neither the left or the right sees us as as just 'people'. Both sides see race, gender and sexuality as sources of profound difference. The left others the mainstream and the right others the minorities. But yes, the right are far better at harnessing the outcome.

Yeah but as we've seen in the UK and the US, and arguably all over Europe, there are a sizeable number of people in all Western countries for whom this happened too fast. We've been living in a bubble IMO, which is why Brexit came as such a shock.