Happy Face

Not really, but you keep constructing Der Untertan.

Page 5 Your own words. You'll have to be more specific, all I can see on Page 5 is where I said the arrest was made...

you need to see some tarkovksy if you liked The Return so much... For a long time my fav dir. He's jumped quite a bit in 6 weeks... http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...mp;#entry615309

Owens

It's possible that they might have commited a crime that wasn't caught on camera.....given that their preferred (and self-confessed) crime of choice is to stop police from filming anything whatsoever. I've said throughout, their treatment wasn't correct. Not sure why you keep suggesting otherwise.

3 days before the attack.... http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/world/as...rikes.html?_r=1 Say one thing, do another.

Man walks into a bar. Says to the barman "ow"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8117991.stm

This reminds me of my mam with the provident lady.

Not until we were bound, gagged, choke holded and kept for 4 days. Self-gagged tbh, as soon as he asked to supply quotes. Obvious to all, including yourselves I suspect. Continue with the 'Lalala! I can't hear you stuff' if it makes you feel better by all means though Like Fop already said once page 5. You two need some practice and need to pay attention. Although it's slightly irrelevant now as Chris has now said (page 12) he's not sure if someone shouldn't be arrested for doing nothing wrong - which is progress (for him). People might take you seriously if you didn't make up arguments. If i say "I don't know if an individual deserved to be arrested" it does not equate to saying "I don't know if someone should be arrested when they've done nothing whatsoever wrong". I'm sure you see the difference but get a tingly feeling in your glans keeping a thread going by feigning complete ignorance. Hence your refusal to quote what I've actually said consistently through the entire thread. So you DO think that someone should be arrested when they are doing absolutely nothing wrong then? Yes or no will do. No. Good, so you eventually agree with Fop (and everyone else) and now that we've convinced you to back away from your prior fascist agenda all is well with the world. (well except if you happen to be those women being brutalised by the police for no reason) I said we agreed pages ago. Glad you've caught up at last. That was only an attempted tactical agreement as you realised the fascist hole you were in, this is clearly an agreement where you realise you are broken and your belief patterns have been changed for the better. :aye: No. We agree 100% on the principals and always have. Our only differences are in this specific case, whether you can categorically say these women commited no crime, and should not have been arrested; and whether or not they go about their cause in the right way. You've decided they couldn't possibly have been in the wrong on the basis of a short Guardian article and no charges being brought. I've loooked into their history and their purpose and think they could possibly have broken the law (since it's what they encourage others to do). Correct me if i'm wrong.

Not until we were bound, gagged, choke holded and kept for 4 days. Self-gagged tbh, as soon as he asked to supply quotes. Obvious to all, including yourselves I suspect. Continue with the 'Lalala! I can't hear you stuff' if it makes you feel better by all means though Like Fop already said once page 5. You two need some practice and need to pay attention. Although it's slightly irrelevant now as Chris has now said (page 12) he's not sure if someone shouldn't be arrested for doing nothing wrong - which is progress (for him). People might take you seriously if you didn't make up arguments. If i say "I don't know if an individual deserved to be arrested" it does not equate to saying "I don't know if someone should be arrested when they've done nothing whatsoever wrong". I'm sure you see the difference but get a tingly feeling in your glans keeping a thread going by feigning complete ignorance. Hence your refusal to quote what I've actually said consistently through the entire thread. So you DO think that someone should be arrested when they are doing absolutely nothing wrong then? Yes or no will do. No. Good, so you eventually agree with Fop (and everyone else) and now that we've convinced you to back away from your prior fascist agenda all is well with the world. (well except if you happen to be those women being brutalised by the police for no reason) I said we agreed pages ago. Glad you've caught up at last.

Not until we were bound, gagged, choke holded and kept for 4 days. Self-gagged tbh, as soon as he asked to supply quotes. Obvious to all, including yourselves I suspect. Continue with the 'Lalala! I can't hear you stuff' if it makes you feel better by all means though Like Fop already said once page 5. You two need some practice and need to pay attention. Although it's slightly irrelevant now as Chris has now said (page 12) he's not sure if someone shouldn't be arrested for doing nothing wrong - which is progress (for him). People might take you seriously if you didn't make up arguments. If i say "I don't know if an individual deserved to be arrested" it does not equate to saying "I don't know if someone should be arrested when they've done nothing whatsoever wrong". I'm sure you see the difference but get a tingly feeling in your glans keeping a thread going by feigning complete ignorance. Hence your refusal to quote what I've actually said consistently through the entire thread. So you DO think that someone should be arrested when they are doing absolutely nothing wrong then? Yes or no will do. No.

Might as well say it's Shearer's squad.

"80% of Geordie nitwits demand Keegan returns"

I wouldn't boycoutt or owt like.

I thought you'd have placed the combined efforts of Alien and Bladerunner higher. ...which would have been a mistake because Ridley Scott's a div Pitfall well avoided

Films for Jimbo to add to his rental list

Thing is though, re the surfaces bit, grass (at Wimbledon) is very similar to hard courts now in terms of the bounce, pace etc. Especially in the second week. Not saying J69 isn't a cock btw Any idea what's expected weather-wise? I thought it was going to be sunny this week, but showers incoming.(although centre court's got a roof now, doesn't it?) First the lottery numbers, now a poorly disguised attempt to avoid having to look at the weather forecast in thelondonpaper so you know whether to take a coat to work tomorrow... truly, your laziness knows no bounds. Still don't know the numbers btw. A full day at work that I may not have needed to do WE KNOW YOUVE GOT A FUCKING JOB MAN!!!! Reminds me of when Kirk off Corrie was on Soccer AM. He never shut up about his Girlfriend. Pleased as punch with himself.

Robots killing people? I think it was Terminator.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8116494.stm Not content with Aliens, Terminator and Terminator 2 (and to a lesser extent The Abyss and Xenogenesis), seems he could be about to do it again. Best Sci-Fi director ever?

Not until we were bound, gagged, choke holded and kept for 4 days. Self-gagged tbh, as soon as he asked to supply quotes. Obvious to all, including yourselves I suspect. Continue with the 'Lalala! I can't hear you stuff' if it makes you feel better by all means though Like Fop already said once page 5. You two need some practice and need to pay attention. Although it's slightly irrelevant now as Chris has now said (page 12) he's not sure if someone shouldn't be arrested for doing nothing wrong - which is progress (for him). People might take you seriously if you didn't make up arguments. If i say "I don't know if an individual deserved to be arrested" it does not equate to saying "I don't know if someone should be arrested when they've done nothing whatsoever wrong". I'm sure you see the difference but get a tingly feeling in your glans keeping a thread going by feigning complete ignorance. Hence your refusal to quote what I've actually said consistently through the entire thread.

Not until we were bound, gagged, choke holded and kept for 4 days. Self-gagged tbh, as soon as he asked to supply quotes. Obvious to all, including yourselves I suspect. Continue with the 'Lalala! I can't hear you stuff' if it makes you feel better by all means though We've already done him under the new ParkFopla pre-crime legislation innit. We read his mind we send him down. "We"? You've not made a worthwhile contribution to this thread man

Thought so. You gave up easy in the end.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/200...4230395712.html