Happy Face

LFC case 3rd up so probably late morning. Fingers crossed Hicks wins this one

He's been in a war zone and had a gun pointed at him on a regular basis, for a start. I'm sure he'll contradict me if that's not the case. Are you German or a Brit living in Germany ? Either way, you should be quite aware of the consequences of allowing madmen some rope .... Aye, the consequences can be dire.....when the madman has a modicum of power. But then if you'd been a German in 1938 you'd have been fully supportive of the Fuhrer and his program of killing whichever fellow citizens he perceived to be a threat. You'd have shouted down anyone opposed to that as unpatriotic as you have nothing but unquestioning obedience to your leaders and what they tell you. Right? Or are you saying a few uneducated, cave dwellers are being given so much rope they could mount a challenge to world democracy on a scale equal to the might of the German military?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11514210 Even as I watched the news yesterday morning, telling me it was her captors that set off an exploding vest I said aloud, it was a blitz, more important to kill the 'insurgents' than rescue the victim. I'm as cynical as they come but I can't see how the US would profit in anyway from not making the success of the rescue the first priority here. I see it the same way I see the drone strikes on weddings, funerals, family homes etc. If there's any innocent victims that's just the way it is, taking out the enemy is the priority as I see it. Whether that's the case or not, my first cynical thought when the original story came out was that it was a cover up, and it seems to have been the right instinct in this case. why do I get the feeling with you, that you think troops should let someone take the first shot at them before they are allowed to fire back Funnily enough that's how international law says it should be....the Bush doctrine shit all over that. As I thought. You aren't in the real world Do you fancy letting someone shoot at you before you fire back at them ? And THAT is fuck all to do with Bush - whatever your illogical anti-american/west views tell you. Aye, if taliban were roaming the streets of newcastle with high powered weapons shooting Brits you'd argue they have the right to protect themselves and their way of live would you? and you would let them ? All in the name of defending themselves against the evil infidels, right No. That's the point. Be consistent. I know you believe you're better than them, that they're all backwards and live in caves and should submit to white rule so consistency doesn't apply to your way of thinking. I don't think they are all backwards at all. They are just different to us, uneducated. They don't listen to fancy dan lecturers, no?

Don't like the sound of it from the CNET preview. http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/video-streamers/...eview-50000579/ Why's that preferable to the Western Digital WD TV Live for the same price? http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/video-streamers/...eview-49304550/

Lynyrd Skynyrd - Pronounced Leh-Nerd Skin-Nerd Almighty

Recommend something please. I'd honestly love to read some persuasive arguments that suggest we're going about things the right way.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11514210 Even as I watched the news yesterday morning, telling me it was her captors that set off an exploding vest I said aloud, it was a blitz, more important to kill the 'insurgents' than rescue the victim. I'm as cynical as they come but I can't see how the US would profit in anyway from not making the success of the rescue the first priority here. I see it the same way I see the drone strikes on weddings, funerals, family homes etc. If there's any innocent victims that's just the way it is, taking out the enemy is the priority as I see it. Whether that's the case or not, my first cynical thought when the original story came out was that it was a cover up, and it seems to have been the right instinct in this case. why do I get the feeling with you, that you think troops should let someone take the first shot at them before they are allowed to fire back Funnily enough that's how international law says it should be....the Bush doctrine shit all over that. As I thought. You aren't in the real world Do you fancy letting someone shoot at you before you fire back at them ? And THAT is fuck all to do with Bush - whatever your illogical anti-american/west views tell you. Aye, if taliban were roaming the streets of newcastle with high powered weapons shooting Brits you'd argue they have the right to protect themselves and their way of live would you? and you would let them ? All in the name of defending themselves against the evil infidels, right No. That's the point. Be consistent. I know you believe you're better than them, that they're all backwards and live in caves and should submit to white rule so consistency doesn't apply to your way of thinking.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11514210 Even as I watched the news yesterday morning, telling me it was her captors that set off an exploding vest I said aloud, it was a blitz, more important to kill the 'insurgents' than rescue the victim. I'm as cynical as they come but I can't see how the US would profit in anyway from not making the success of the rescue the first priority here. I see it the same way I see the drone strikes on weddings, funerals, family homes etc. If there's any innocent victims that's just the way it is, taking out the enemy is the priority as I see it. Whether that's the case or not, my first cynical thought when the original story came out was that it was a cover up, and it seems to have been the right instinct in this case. why do I get the feeling with you, that you think troops should let someone take the first shot at them before they are allowed to fire back Funnily enough that's how international law says it should be....the Bush doctrine shit all over that. As I thought. You aren't in the real world Do you fancy letting someone shoot at you before you fire back at them ? And THAT is fuck all to do with Bush - whatever your illogical anti-american/west views tell you. Aye, if taliban were roaming the streets of newcastle with high powered weapons shooting Brits you'd argue they have the right to protect themselves and their way of live would you?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11514210 Even as I watched the news yesterday morning, telling me it was her captors that set off an exploding vest I said aloud, it was a blitz, more important to kill the 'insurgents' than rescue the victim. I'm as cynical as they come but I can't see how the US would profit in anyway from not making the success of the rescue the first priority here. I see it the same way I see the drone strikes on weddings, funerals, family homes etc. If there's any innocent victims that's just the way it is, taking out the enemy is the priority as I see it. Whether that's the case or not, my first cynical thought when the original story came out was that it was a cover up, and it seems to have been the right instinct in this case. why do I get the feeling with you, that you think troops should let someone take the first shot at them before they are allowed to fire back Funnily enough that's how international law says it should be....the Bush doctrine shit all over that.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11514210 Even as I watched the news yesterday morning, telling me it was her captors that set off an exploding vest I said aloud, it was a blitz, more important to kill the 'insurgents' than rescue the victim. I'm as cynical as they come but I can't see how the US would profit in anyway from not making the success of the rescue the first priority here. I see it the same way I see the drone strikes on weddings, funerals, family homes etc. If there's any innocent victims that's just the way it is, taking out the enemy is the priority as I see it. Whether that's the case or not, my first cynical thought when the original story came out was that it was a cover up, and it seems to have been the right instinct in this case.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11514210 Even as I watched the news yesterday morning, telling me it was her captors that set off an exploding vest I said aloud, it was a blitz, more important to kill the 'insurgents' than rescue the victim.

Wyclef Jean - It Doesn't Matter I just smelled what the Rock is cooking.

Gamu! Gamu!! Gamu!!!

I totally agree with him. It's not as if he's saying man-made global warming is a lie though is it.

So happy Wagner and his bongos got through. Reminded me of Curb Your Enthusiasm when Larry was trying to wake the dude up.

To tell you the truth, I've hardly been impressed with any of the places where I've taken up deals. Only Linden Hall for the golf was excellent value for money. I'd recommend only taking the deals if they're particularly cheap or you already know the place is good.

Thanks for all the recommendations. We had dinner in the Dome. Lush burger, not great chips, lovely place. We were staying near Dalkeith and couldn't be harrassed going back into the city to try any others. We we had our tea at the Sun Inn. 2010 Gastropub of the year.... http://www.thesuninnedinburgh.co.uk/index.php It was absolutley heaving in there....but it was excellent. Well worth putting up with the crowds.

http://www.juancole.com/2010/10/israeli-se...n-children.html Don't watch it if you're squirmish. It is the whole situation crystalised though. An impoverished child throws a stone in defiance....and get's disproportionately mowed down by an israeli settler in what can arguably be called self-defence.

Banksy's intro to the Simpsons. Credit to them for airing it .

Anyone buy this deal for Hanahana? Has everyone had refunds for this? lass at work hasnt had one yet. Sent them an email last week cos they haven't credited my account yet.

The Chelsea one says Ashley Cole Cuckolded Cheryl Cole. I know he's a tad effete, but that's harsh.

Might try chop chop like. ta

Got a shared doc we're trying to open and get the error: "The Microsoft Jet database engine stopped the process because you and another user are attempting to change the same data at the same time. " Tried decompiling....get the same error. Tried "compact & repair"....get the same error. Microsoft help says.... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/318882 But i wouldn't know if i've got SQL Server Enterprise Manager. Is it standard?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11498607 Look and learn Osborne.

Not normally a fan of Thai Gemmil, but that looks a nice place with a menu that tickles my fancy. Just been on tripadvisor for the first time cheers CT, good stuff. Cheers Chez, I'll walk around that general area Can't trust Google as much as the people on here Alex. People who can be held accountable for a shitty recommendation