Happy Face

UGK - Steal Your Mind (Ft. Too Short & Snoop Dogg) Bruce Springsteen - Come On (Let's Go Tonight) Johnny Cash - Hey Porter Basement Jaxx - Red Alert Girl Talk - Minute By Minute Frog Eyes - ...Eagle Energy The Streets - Wouldn't Have It Any Other Way Nirvana - About A Girl Soulwax - Accidents And Compliments Rufus Wainwright - Movies of Myself The Antlers - Epilogue Kanye West - Heard 'Em Say The Roots - Boom Nina Simone - Look Of Love Animal Collective - Graze Modest Mouse - I Came As A Rat Ennio Morricone - Love Theme From "Guns For San Sebastian" (Reprise) The Black Keys - All You Ever Wanted Outkast - Cruisin in the ATL (interlude) Nas - The Genesis Tend to move stuff I love off there once I've exhausted it though...Entire discography's of Bob Dylan, The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Public Enemy, Built to Spill, Kraftwerk etc aren't included cos of space limits.

"Thankyou to god...for making me an atheist"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12205690 Expose the soldiers, it causes a ripple. Expose the politicians, it causes a wave. Exposing the actual people with power....the ones with the cash who're hiding it....it'll be a tsunami!

DJBC has done a couple of albums of Beastie Boys/Beatles mashups that are great. All these are years old though. The best ongoing series of mixes are from the Hood Internet.... Loads more at their website.

...and Stars on 45

...and Steinski

...Avalanches too.

Try a bit of Jason Forrest too. Shamelessly Exciting is classic. For example...

Raiding The 20th Century - A History of the Cut Up. Used to be freely availabe all over but I can't find a link now. Should be torrents. You Have heard The Grey Album haven't you? Everyone's got that.

The Decemberists - The King is Dead If REM can't do what they used to, I suppose the Decemberists might as well. Down By The Water = This One Goes Out to the One I love

Probably reacted better to the previous attack on the WTC.

Obama's human rights report card.... http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/01/13...urity-policy-2/

Whey that's a bit like hiring Gordon Ramsay and saying he'll have nowt to do with the catering. Have we actually hired him though? Genuine question as I've not heard it confirmed. I could imagine Pardew being the last to know owt as well like. I've only read what's in this thread in the last 10 minutes, but I thought if we hadn't, Pardew would state there was no truth in the story that Joorabchian was being employed by the club.

Whey that's a bit like hiring Gordon Ramsay and saying he'll have nowt to do with the catering.

I agree it's not Obama's fault like, it's been set up like this for decades ever since corporations became humnan in the eyes of the law. Everyone's a stooge because everyone relies on corporate funding to get any power. What's disappointing is that he tells people it's any different and "yes we can" affect change. I don't buy that anyone can change that around in any number of terms. It needs the voters to move away from the two parties on the payroll. Sensational rhetoric is just cable news catnip. It has no effect whatsoever on what gets lobbied through the houses. Which, imo, is more likely to happen under Obama than any President in my life time. Can't see that either tbh. Think the course is set now. They're heading for the cliff and China's ready to step in and show that the democratic experiment has failed.

Normally my view, but I took us against Wigan and then HT/FT against West Ham so i thought i may as well jump on those odds, I mustn't be the jinx i thought i was.

From there.... Quite a few shots on goal and corners for 30 minutes before kick off. PMSL

I agree it's not Obama's fault like, it's been set up like this for decades ever since corporations became humnan in the eyes of the law. Everyone's a stooge because everyone relies on corporate funding to get any power. What's disappointing is that he tells people it's any different and "yes we can" affect change. I don't buy that anyone can change that around in any number of terms. It needs the voters to move away from the two parties on the payroll. Sensational rhetoric is just cable news catnip. It has no effect whatsoever on what gets lobbied through the houses.

Paddy Power Offering 5/1 for a Newcastle win. Use the link at NUFC.com Maximum stake £10 though

His healthcare bill dropped tens of millions of new paying customers into the lap of the health insurance industry....they lobbied in favour of his changes.....omitting a public option. Very much a corporate stooge on that score. His rhetoric was of a public option, which he dropped once in power. He didn't affect the change he promised. No-one in washington is double dealing....they're all pulling in the same direction. Corporate ownership of state. The reform bill requires the industry to pay over $100 billion in cash to the government for funding. The impact of the additional insured population depends on the price they pay, which will be driven down by insurance exchanges. The cost to the population of any insurance will be high because healthcare is absurdly expensive in the US because of the huge remuneration to doctors. A jobbing oncologist earns half a million dollars a year. Paid for via fee for service reimbursement from public and private insurance. The return to the insurance industry in terms of profit is not clear, revenues will go up but their fear is this will not be enough to compensate for the increased costs of providing healthcare to people who are paying lower and lower premiums, who are the least healthiest and have the highest costs. The increased population with access to drugs will be offset for pharma from downward price pressure from the insurance companies on prices. Medicare and Medicaid will set price limits for drugs outside of the private market as they are squeezed by federal budget cost pressures. Tiered pricing schemes for newly insured patients will further reduce actual prices (rather than what are called WAC or list prices). Whilst these effects are playing out, both industries are subsidising healthcare reform directly. Corporate stooge my fat arse. None of that backs up Fish's claim he's affected the change promised in his early rhetoric. What period is that $100Bn coming in from the insurers over btw? Never heard that figure and the combined profits of the top 5 suppliers are only about a tenth of that aren't they? He couldnt even affect a watered down version because of resistance. He lost the mid-terms because centrist voters have dropped him, not because of disaffected lefties abstaining. The $100bn is coming from pharma, not insurance. I presume they have to pay too. So that's a different matter....it was an insurance blowjob. If you think losing centrals lost him the election then I think you're completely wrong. He lost Everyone who wouldn't usually vote....but were inspired to vote by his inspirational 2008 promise of the world....ending wars, stopping torture, universal healthcare.

Quick question Parky, why bring race into it? It's been pivotal in stopping liberals criticising him

His healthcare bill dropped tens of millions of new paying customers into the lap of the health insurance industry....they lobbied in favour of his changes.....omitting a public option. Very much a corporate stooge on that score. His rhetoric was of a public option, which he dropped once in power. He didn't affect the change he promised. No-one in washington is double dealing....they're all pulling in the same direction. Corporate ownership of state. The reform bill requires the industry to pay over $100 billion in cash to the government for funding. The impact of the additional insured population depends on the price they pay, which will be driven down by insurance exchanges. The cost to the population of any insurance will be high because healthcare is absurdly expensive in the US because of the huge remuneration to doctors. A jobbing oncologist earns half a million dollars a year. Paid for via fee for service reimbursement from public and private insurance. The return to the insurance industry in terms of profit is not clear, revenues will go up but their fear is this will not be enough to compensate for the increased costs of providing healthcare to people who are paying lower and lower premiums, who are the least healthiest and have the highest costs. The increased population with access to drugs will be offset for pharma from downward price pressure from the insurance companies on prices. Medicare and Medicaid will set price limits for drugs outside of the private market as they are squeezed by federal budget cost pressures. Tiered pricing schemes for newly insured patients will further reduce actual prices (rather than what are called WAC or list prices). Whilst these effects are playing out, both industries are subsidising healthcare reform directly. Corporate stooge my fat arse. None of that backs up Fish's claim he's affected the change promised in his early rhetoric. What period is that $100Bn coming in from the insurers over btw? Never heard that figure and the combined profits of the top 5 suppliers are only about a tenth of that aren't they?

Can't even find a picture of Crowtree Leisure Centre, by far the best of the 2 gyms in all of Sunderland.....sadly due for closure as just the 1 does the "city".

Bowling and clubbing in style...in a warehouse