Happy Face

I think I've declared my love for Prelude For Time Feelers before.

The Smiths - Stop Me If You Think That You've Heard This One Before

So they say. 4 year contract up to 2010 £4.5M a year isn't that ridiculous though, considering the likes of Julia Louis dreyfus got double that per season of Seinfeld.

He's good quality. Just watched Fridays show tonight. Get's points for attacking Wrighty with a pugil stick.

Is that on BBC? I've not seen the trailer, but it's probably Sigur Ros. It is on BBC. It's ok HF, I've found it, its Ghosts by Japan I thought the charter insisted that Sigur Ros were always used. David Brent tbh

Is that on BBC? I've not seen the trailer, but it's probably Sigur Ros.

Might be wrong, but my hunch is he doesn't even watch all 10 games every weekend.

Oh aye I make 1 comment people line up to "argue" with me and I'm killing them? But rather misses my point. Again absolutely nothing to do with what I've said. We've been terrible for most of the season full stop (in every sense). But that's got little to do with our "established" reputation, or indeed the reason for your "argument". It doesn't matter what you say. My blinkered reliance on the received wisdom tells me that you're an argumentative WUM. 3 years of insightful comments won't change that I'm afraid. So basically you ADMIT you're just arguing for the sake of it......... what do you know I was right. You were right. You were right about me. Tell your sister... you were right. *dies*

Fop's taken wummery up a notch into meta-arguments. It doesn't matter what happened because something else could have happened, which renders a fact based reading of the situation worthless. It has happened, and will happen again. You've got to pay some attention though, so it's no surprise it has passed you by completely. I've seen many instances of people getting praised when their tactics work and blasted when they fail cheers.....that is what you're complaining about, right? Not as such no. Pay attention. Although it doesn't really matter as I could be arguing white is white and all the usual suspects would be lining up to argue that white was black (and probably calling me racist to boot as well). I thought you were as good as arguing white was black. Unless you agree Keane got his tactics wrong yesterday? Whatever tactics Keane employed would be "wrong" with that result. That's a fact. The weren't required.

Again absolutely nothing to do with what I've said. We've been terrible for most of the season full stop (in every sense). But that's got little to do with our "established" reputation, or indeed the reason for your "argument". It doesn't matter what you say. My blinkered reliance on the received wisdom tells me that you're an argumentative WUM. 3 years of insightful comments won't change that I'm afraid.

Fop's taken wummery up a notch into meta-arguments. It doesn't matter what happened because something else could have happened, which renders a fact based reading of the situation worthless. It has happened, and will happen again. You've got to pay some attention though, so it's no surprise it has passed you by completely. I've seen many instances of people getting praised when their tactics work and blasted when they fail cheers.....that is what you're complaining about, right? Not as such no. Pay attention. Although it doesn't really matter as I could be arguing white is white and all the usual suspects would be lining up to argue that white was black (and probably calling me racist to boot as well). I thought you were as good as arguing white was black. Unless you agree Keane got his tactics wrong yesterday?

That old chestnut is bang on though, we'll probably have conceded 60 by the end of the season, Watford didn't even concede that many last year when they came last. When we've kept more than 2 clean sheets from the 20 games against top half opposition, we can complain the defence are getting a bad rap. ...though that would be using hindsight, so we'll be stuck between a rock and a hard place I guess. And the seasons where we DID actually have very good defensive records and still got the same old same old? What would that be then? That would be a bad rap. I've embiggened where I said that to make the point more cromulent. Which is part of my point. What was yours again? That we haven't had a bad rap this season. I thought your point was the opposite, we've been terrible defensively all year, but a few clean sheets against weaker opposition (Portsmouth aside) and you want every pundit to be praising our class at the back.

Fop's taken wummery up a notch into meta-arguments. It doesn't matter what happened because something else could have happened, which renders a fact based reading of the situation worthless. It has happened, and will happen again. You've got to pay some attention though, so it's no surprise it has passed you by completely. I've seen many instances of people getting praised when their tactics work and blasted when they fail cheers.....that is what you're complaining about, right?

That old chestnut is bang on though, we'll probably have conceded 60 by the end of the season, Watford didn't even concede that many last year when they came last. When we've kept more than 2 clean sheets from the 20 games against top half opposition, we can complain the defence are getting a bad rap. ...though that would be using hindsight, so we'll be stuck between a rock and a hard place I guess. And the seasons where we DID actually have very good defensive records and still got the same old same old? What would that be then? That would be a bad rap. I've embiggened where I said that to make the point more cromulent.

Fop's taken wummery up a notch into meta-arguments. It doesn't matter what happened because something else could have happened, which renders a fact based reading of the situation worthless.

That old chestnut is bang on though, we'll probably have conceded 60 by the end of the season, Watford didn't even concede that many last year when they came last. When we've kept more than 2 clean sheets from the 20 games against top half opposition, we can complain the defence are getting a bad rap. ...though that would be using hindsight, so we'll be stuck between a rock and a hard place I guess.

They sing songs tenuously related to the oncoming guest don't they? Like a UK version of Paul Shaffer or Kevin Eubanks.

http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...amp;#entry86307

I'd hoy on Viduka, Owen AND Martins. Whether it meant Martins on the right or behind the front 2. I really should be given a job in football management. Keegan blatantly read this and has stuck with it since

That's some noise for the first.

Maybe its only the 10k or so that turned to drugs following the last season or so that are eligible for it. 10 years ago...must've been Dalglish turned them to drugs.

I doubt anyone's crying themself to sleep.

Maybe if she was a junkie the club could sort something.

Martin Callanan has just been on five live whining about it. Tosser. The club do some generous community outreach work and he slates them for it.