Meenzer

Neither was Fernando Pancake

Oh, is he coming for the week too? Canny. We're not letting him watch any American sports though.

Regular. Well, right now it's just "caked in dirt", but I'm pretty sure it's the regular stuff under there.

Naah, I'm only playing because I'm one of the useless wastes to which he refers. And he's probably not much wrong.

Careful now............

I imagine this will involve carefully financial planning them up my jacksy. Some of them do look intriguingly knobbly...

Bitter lemons on you! Besides, you surely haven't booked your flights to Portugal yet so just sack it off. I'm sure Matt'll forgive you. One day.

That's perfectly legitimate in a conversational context, my little bald herring.

Just got given a bag of beetroots and Jerusalem artichokes from a friend's overflowing allotment. Need to look for something interesting to do with them that isn't just "soup" (though that will be the backup if all else fails ).

What about the other 6?

I'd go 4-4-1-1 for this Krul Shane - Undersoil Heating - Fitness Consultant - Shane Marveaux - Marveaux - Undersoil Heating - Shane Marveaux Undersoil Heating

Undersoil heating would have more impact on the right wing, too

Nominative determinism at its finest. The refutation: http://www.kfh.co.uk/press/catford.htm - even the professionals acknowledge that Help to Buy is seen a useful price-driver.

https://twitter.com/clogsilk/status/423381718574178304 Osborne's policies are benefiting one group of people, at least...

Might as well put the plate inside the sandwich too

http://deadspin.com/5924827/american-baby-names-are-somehow-getting-even-worse

Christ

Zurich has obviously had some very specific vandalism issues on its public transport...

Maybe they are the next step in evolution.

I can heartily recommend the saltimbocca con fetta di pane imburrata.

Maybe Tooj was a maths prodigy and his first utterance was actually "5318008" but they were holding him upside-down so they got the wrong idea about the priorities of his young life. ....aye, probably not.

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fraud-and-error-in-the-benefit-system The figures are published there so I imagine the methodology is detailed somewhere on the site too.

It's really not imo, and your first sentence explains exactly why. Unfortunately the disproportionate coverage of the exceptional cases in the scum press inevitably leads to this kind of thing: