Meenzer

Tories are going to sneak this, you know.

No, it had the Tories on 316

Well well well. Best we could have hoped for under the circumstances really. Of course the exit poll said something similar last time...

DIMBLEBOT all the way for me.

If it's a clear Tory majority on the exit poll, I'll stay up for the first declarations then hit the sack. If there's any real doubt, I'm probably here all night, aye.

Aye, I reckon Plymouth

Peter Principle

Thread for you, anyway, CT.

Bontcho Guentchev

No tellers and no queue at my polling station, just one old lady repeatedly asking the people behind the desk if she was supposed to vote for one candidate or several.

Dude, he just accused you of virtue signalling.

Is it Bontcho Guentchev?

Fair point from The Times that this was supposed to be the Brexit election. Could they not have pointed that out sooner though?

They absolutely are. I've already got my money on them getting fewer than 10 seats (odds were 6/4-ish at the time, would have been significantly better a month earlier), but I'm beginning to wish I'd gone even lower. And regardless of who wins, a reminder that this is what they'll face on Friday: https://musealoudblog.wordpress.com/2017/06/06/brexit-traitors/amp/ Have a good evening everyone.

Again, you can't accuse the pollsters of herding this time round. Be fascinating to see who's right and who's wrong (clue: this one's right)

He wears his pants outside his trousers, if that counts.

Howay, you must know by now when I'm on the wind-up. A bit, anyway.

So he's unelectable.

And if he'd tried that from the start...?

Corbyn needed to meet them halfway and understand that his election was as a figurehead of a particular movement rather than a tacit endorsement of everything he stands for. Form a left-leaning coalition within Labour, if you like, but still with Corbynomics at its heart. That is and remains his mistake.

Also, "thread", as I believe the kids say