adios

I'm obviously taking the piss, but honestly it's you who needs to get a grip, vile human being that she is tbs tbs.

Aye, but HF said barmaids were generally required to show a bit of skin, not that in this warped fantasy universe they were. I'm referring to the BB tap water demon, Alex.

I get that it was an accurate portrayal of the comic, I said that above, I just don't see the point, because comics are for muppets. I'm not slagging the achievements of the movie, I'm slagging you, you mongtard!

I must have restricted access to some part of this forum. I thought the film was one of the most cringeworthy things I'd ever seen, technical accomplishment didn't change that. Given how utterly shite nearly every aspect of the film was I have to assume you're being blinded by something. Given that HF has already said he likes one of the most loathsome characters on this planet, and that he finds her attractive I find it a lot easier to dump you two in the perv bin. Nice easy pidgeon-holing.

Well, at least your stereotypes weren't adversely affected. 180483[/snapback] It was film noir DotBum, didn't you get that? 180488[/snapback] Think about it some more.

You're trying to find high-brow justification for your seedy, nerdy fantasies, embrace your inner nerd.

Well, at least your stereotypes weren't adversely affected.

And why there, because it's for pubescents and smelly students (lest we forget Fish)? I can't even recall a sex scene in any of the examples HF cites, or much generally, to state that's more offensive than Sin City is rediculous in the extreme. I'm now picturing HF as a man who divides his time equally between masturbating over Big Brother, comic books and his guide to movie masturbation tbh.

Why the skimpy outfits?

I'm stealing your mantle in the film thread tbh. (Bobby the Shins will be pleased)

It was visually very impressive, that doesn't cut it for me for 2 hours. What about the portrayal of the women in it, how is it not a wankfest? A plot and vaguely believeble acting helped the movies you've mentioned, by the way.

Go on so, enlighten me as to how it was enjoyable. And take your dick out of your hand when I'm talking to you!

I think he's a vulgar unfunny arsehole in the main. I'm not a prude and I don't mind the odd dirty joke, but when it's your entire act, what's the fucking point? I'm gonna sound like a right snobby twat here, but I'd say he generally appeals to thick fuckers, because there's no requirement to engage your brain in the slightest to get his jokes. 180457[/snapback] I think that ship has sailed. I agree, though. When you look at a bloke like Jimeoin (Nordy fella, think he's from the same town as ewerk actually), never swears, had me in stitches talking about musrooms (common garden variety. Not my favourite by a long shot but he puts pricks like Brown to shame.

If he doesn't play we won't get psychologically injured, that's of more concern tbh. Can someone explain it to me, because I'm having trouble; what position other than goalkeeper can get away with that little movement? I've seen his compilation and he looks a deadly finisher, but he can't get there without moving, so what's happened, confidence? I've seen this Spanish league he's from, they move there too.

It's quite obviously faithful to the graphic novel and is a fucking horrible pubescent wank fest as a result - so yes it could be said to achieve it's aims but anyone who likes it spends too much time alone with their penis. FACTATHON! If that's your benchmark then the puerile drivel on daytime US TV is some of the best entertainment in the world.

Mine's not based on that much more, 2 legs Lillestrom, Ventspils and Villareal - none of them live - proper little armchair pundit, me. He's obviously talented, has a range of passing that no one else in the team does, but whatever about lack of options I've seen too many times he's failed to make a pass over 10 yards, Amady Faye stylee, or go past one too many players and concede (again possibly lack of options). He's good in a 4-5-1, but we're missing the 1 from that equation. Actually, thinking about it, I'm being harsh on his pre-season form, drop Parker for him and if he hasn't sorted it out over a couple of games, then I'll say drop him...except we can't drop our captain.

Sin City's one of the worst movies I've ever watched.

That is a fucking atrocious film and I usually love Johnny Depp. Once Upon A Time In The West is a classic. Payback is canny but Mel Gibson really is no Lee Marvin! 180436[/snapback] I meant John Woo's Paycheck, I appear to be on a bit of a roll. I was trying to be kind about the movie I though Luke had bought, I was also not a fan, and am also a fan of Depp. Although I do think he only really plays himself, it's a good self to play.

Apart from 2nd half against Ventspils, I really don't agree with that, concedes far too much posession. It's a close one between him and Parker for that slot, though.

Solano, Parker, Butt, N'Zog Shola, Duff FACT!

Ah...Once upon a time in Mexico...slightly different film. Forgiven.

I do that a lot. I could never buy a movie for packaging, that movie's not even that good, is it? I keep all my DVDs in those carry case/bag thingies, much more convenient. Some extras (particularly comedy ones) I hang on to, but it has to have something good on.

In my experience, I don't see how this could really make the law any more arbitrary.

Coincidence? I think not. Hi-Ho!

People would be saying "These scarves are shite". 180323[/snapback] "You're only saying that because they're black & white!"