adios

How can you tell?

Better than 20/20 is fairly common, I had rediculous eyesight as a child but now it's just very good. It's not like 100%, as the good doctor pointed out, it merely means being able to read from slightly further away than most, should put that on my cv tbh. The girlfriend's also got better than 20/20, it makes her think things are slightly bigger than they are, thankfully.

How did you come up with your username? Are you honestly expecting people to believe that two people have come up with that name independently for NUFC forums, unless I'm missing an obvious reference? And how come your mate on N-O said you were posting exclusively over here now?

I don't agree.

It kind of put the importance of the match in perspective for me, for all of about 10 minutes. I thought Parker was a legend to get up and put in the preformance he did after the state he was obviously in. The annoying thing about today's result is that we have half of a high quality team, some of the passing and movement today was very impressive, if Glenn had sorted out 3 players in those previously mentioned positions I honestly reckon we'd be looking at top 4 with a little luck with injuries (ha ha).

Aye, it's hard to say anything other that Roedent's made a fucking mockery of our transfers this summer. His comments on Milner today are also spectacular in their stupidity. Apparently Bullard's dislocated his knee, my first reaction on seeing it on the replay was that he'd never play again. It was one of those where my brain didn't really register it properly as his leg was so out of shape, it looked to me like he must have snapped every ligament in his knee. I half wanted to see it again to try and figure out what I'd seen, I half wanted to go and have a little cry for myself. Can't believe they showed the replay.

I think he looks like he's had Craig Bellamy's face shoved through the back of his head. He was getting a torrid time, getting knocked about and I was only saying two minutes before that they should leave Bullard alone as he was ugly enough without that expression on his face, then Parker goes and does that!

Midfield were decent, Duff, Parker GREAT! Shola was ok and Martins was industrious, has impressive close control, Moore and Carr did well. Bramble I've now seen enough of, get rid; Ramage should not have been on the pitch. If we'd had Campbell, Bridge, Viduka on the pitch today we'd have won 3-0. My head went a bit funny when they showed Bullard's knee go. I think Parker wass actually in tears over it.

The last time I was with the optometrist he told me "better than 20/20", that was in Ireland, but we seem to use mostly UK systems.

Don't think so, you're not taking the poo-face thing seriously, are you?

PokerPants will pwn you tbh. Cheers for those 2 sites lads, already aware of them, and they're quality.

Call off the engagement, hock the ring, she'll appreciate the practicality.

Sounds like the premise to a dodgy slasher flick, stay well clear tbh.

And I was thinking 'tits', always got to drag things further into the gutter, Alex. I'll try to avoid your mother's snatch, if at all possible.

The title bit too? At least I know there's one person sicker than me around here.

That pretty much sums it up for me.

I'm a lot odder than that, what's your point?

Pretty unusual username for a Newcastle forum, if it was two magmas on competing geological forums I might buy it. I've never heard of this DotBum cunt on that other forum btw.

Bob Mills thing. Aye I remember that. 195418[/snapback] Do you like Chris Morris btw poo-face? I quite like Ideal, but haven't seen enough of it yet to pass judgement. Johnny Vegas' Who's ready for Ice-cream is inspired.

And Rantin' would be feckin' horrified at being classed as normal. He's a medical man, you know.

It's not that bizarre, I'm exactly the same, I have to have a lot of bookmarks ranging from proper ones to taxi receipts. A wander over to the bookcase often results in me starting a new book. Actually, I may have just proved your point... 195398[/snapback] Exactly, are you suggesting it's not bizarre behaviour because you do it? Would you watch two films at once, say watch the first 20 minutes of one and switch to another, then back again? No, I don't think so. 195402[/snapback] 195409[/snapback] Was Renton not the one with a sig talking about rhetorical questions being for politicians and psychopaths, or was that someone else? HF?

Well, you seem to think you not doing it makes it bizarre, and Alex isn't exactly helping your case. Regarding the movie analogy, I'll assume most of us watch a movie in one sitting, but not a book, gobshite!

More gate revenue for Liverpool then - the top 4 are streaking ahead of us tbh. 195369[/snapback] Fucking short-termists.

It's not that bizarre, I'm exactly the same, I have to have a lot of bookmarks ranging from proper ones to taxi receipts. A wander over to the bookcase often results in me starting a new book. Actually, I may have just proved your point...

Quality.