adios

Is that speculation?

Could just be speculation.

I think Noelie's actually gone further down this thought process than you. If you cut off his legs, then he'll be stood on his little stumps, with his cock just resting on the ground, kind of like a tripod. To me, cutting off his legs does not equate to leaving stumps though. The whole idea of it is broken. The impression I'm getting would leave little stumps, or are you going to sand him down to a smooth finish after you cut a perfect arc from his bollocks to respective hips? This may require pictures...actually this is surely a question for ChaCha.

Which makes him slightly more useful than the man he's trying so deperately to defend.

The Fish, cool under pressure. Have you ever considered a career in sales?

I think Noelie's actually gone further down this thought process than you. If you cut off his legs, then he'll be stood on his little stumps, with his cock just resting on the ground, kind of like a tripod.

Bollocks they are. Looks like the they've got the Senate, too.

Rumsfeld's gone.

Should close your mouth tbh.

And they beat us a fortnight ago.

You're a snob with very poor taste, Parky's just a fucking plank.

Invisible woman sexually assaulted.

Someone's already alluded to it, I think any conversation on that level is probably forbidden in the Newcastle forum.

Bet he'd recognise the smell, though.

Keep trying though, eh? I'm sure you'll get through to him in the end. How big is that fucking picture btw?

He's from Hexham but doesn't acknowledge his North-Eastern heritage. The adverse publicity all stems from a smear campaign by the Northumbrian. Hang the cunt tbh.

What are drug-related crimes?

who? EDIT; Sorry, just checked the name of the picture file, I vaguely know who he is, and he seems to have attracted a lot of vitriol, but I've no idea what he's done? Oh, and why do you care?

That's quite ambitious tbf.

I saw the incident and thought it might be something like that. Shit gets said in the heat of the moment tbh, but until the racism issue can be discussed rationally then it's going to stay how it is; so that'll be forever basically. I also wouldn't rule out foul play on the part of Spurs, Jol has turned them into a filthy team, turned my stomach watching their play-acting on Sunday.

This is highly questionable though at this stage. Go on. The Bramble issue is about much more than the individual incidents, he unsettles the whole defence and the whole team when he decides to act the clown, that lost us the points in both matches.

Conjecture is not irrelevant when arguing the current strength of the squad.

so you disagree with: -Bramble cost us 3 points against Bolton. -Bramble cost us 3 points against Fulham. -If only we'd had a half decent target man against Charlton, we'd have won the match. Seriously?

We're 10 points off 6th place in a shite league. Martin O'Neill, Mark Viduka and someone like Upson and we'd easily challenge top 6. Even under Roeder, with this squad, Bramble can take practically 100% of the blame (on the pitch) for 6 points, and a target man would have given us 3 points against Charlton certainly, and most probably against Sheffield United. While some of what you say isn't inaccurate... Could you be more specific about that please, it's pretty much impossible to respond to.