adios

Better

Not even with a body of water between us tbh.

I was tempted to make another slight alteration to that, but I really didn't have the nerve.

Right, this is a serious question. Did I see a different version of this film to everyone else? Can someone give me a brief rundown of all the sex in it? Anyway, all of it was there for a reason, not a thing I saw was gratuitous (yes, inlcuding some pretty extreme violence). PS HF - answer my PM, please. I just edited Brock's post tbh. There wasn't enough to satisfy Jimbo, but there was as much as you'd expect in a film about some lads on a trip to get as much hole as they can. PS - I did but my PC froze, wasn't sure if it was succesful or not. My answer was...I agree with you, though I don't recall where it was pertinent. I'll stick it here, don't highlight this area if you're intereted in doing the IQ test: --> Odd one out. Circle, square, rectangle, iscoseles triangle, equilateral triangle. I said the iscosceles because all the others had equal angles contained within. They say circle as it has no straight lines around it's perimeter. Unless the circle is infinite of course, but I guess they didn't think of that... <--

If you hadn't sheltered her with c*nts upon cnuts, she'd have been prepared when she went out into the real world, and we'd never be in this mess in the first place!

Right, this is a serious question. Did I see a different version of this film to everyone else? Can someone give me a brief rundown of all the sex in it? Anyway, all of it was there for a reason, not a thing I saw was gratuitous (yes, inlcuding some pretty extreme violence). PS HF - answer my PM, please.

Oh my God! We killed catmag.

Hostel was just an excuse to cram as much sex and gore into a film to see what they could get away with before the MPAA stepped in, whilst at least Saw 2 had a reasonable plot, and was Darren Bousman's directing debut. In light of that last fact, some discrepencies can be overlooked (like they got Adam's chain on the wrong foot ). It's not a perfect film, but as a fan of the franchise I enjoyed it. Hostel, as a film is average at best. You completely missed the point, this is not surprising. Go back to your believable plot lines of Saw. I find you far more offensive than the reality of a lads' weekend in Amsterdam. Go figure.

Apoplectic, hissing at the screen tbh. When the mods see fit to change your screenname to cuntmag, I promise to never use the term on here again. I reckon it's a term of affection, anyway.

Brock, you rate Saw II, but didn't rate Hostel. This is not about opinions, you are mentally retarded. FACT!

I think if you had used it to take advantage of her, you would be, which is what we're talking about here. Mind, I don't see how it's much of an argument, as we could both define 'cunt' pretty differently. I think we're all cunts for various reasons, and I'm particularly bad (probably a fetid one tbh) in many ways, but not this one. I see catmag lurking, I'd say she's having a field day!

That Drogba/Lehmann incident was fantastic, I thought I was watching some Vaudeville skit, really. Plenty of entertainment towards the end.

The irony being that 2 of them were Liverpool players at the time, and now they're going to sign him? I agree that saying that it wasn't a red is reasonable, it's just not right.

Hughes was (as ever) talking bollocks about the goals being offside. Martins was level with the last defender, if not an inch or 2 behind him and for the second goal Zog's cross into the box doesn't go forward so Taylor can't be offside as its not from a forward pass. For the sending off when i saw it live on TV i thought straight red, but watching on MOTD i can see the argument that it was out wide and away from the goal so possibly harsh, but i don't think you can knock the ref for giving a red as he was last man and Martins was away from him. The ref had a strange game, he was impressive first half then turned to shite in the second half deciding to allow Blackburn's hatchet men to kick the crap out of our players yet booked two of ours for about the only fouls we committed! For those who only saw the highlights, Henchoz was also lucky to escape a yellow card on 2 previous occasions. I think it's very likely that played a part in Gallagher's(?) decision. Shame MOTD didn't mention it. With Martins' pace, if he had got clear of that (rugby) tackle he would have been 1 on 1, at a reasonable angle. Under FA regulations, Lucas Neill should have been pelted with bits of the stadium until he died, for his behavior. So these things even themselves out.

How many years of University did that staggering observation take? I was more talking about taking unfair advantage of someone once you know you have something over them. I wouldn't do it, or rather if I did, it would make me a cunt.

Kind of suggests you think all women are cunts tbh.

I managed to get a hold of the answers, if anyone's interested, PM me. Pud, congrats, you got every question right. As far as I'm concerned, so did I. I can see why their answer is correct, but so is mine. I hereby upgrade myself to 144. Any mathematicians want to PM me so I can run the question by them? I don't want to post it on here and ruin it for others. This test's a load of bollocks btw, great way to pass time before the footie, though..

Yes, a comedy-tastic one, to be precise.

Snap. That personalised report well worth the cash, then.

It just shows a standard pic of a report showing 110 IQ. Not that bit, there's another link. Can't remember what it was called now...

I'll let you in on a little secret, I didn't think you could have achieved that score. I think you're the reason that bell curve allows for the possibility of an infinitely small number, however improbable.

Here, Pud, what does yours say when you click on that "limited free report" bit, I want to see if it's standard. Also someone who got around 133 (as that's what the girlfriend got).

She's making you look like a massive twat, then you come on here and tell us about it. What effect would you say that has?

I've got that one to watch, must try sit down with it this evening.

i think we need to see photographic evidence. I got 154 on my 2nd go Blatantly gutted you didn't think to wait till you posted up your score Hang on, is he being serious? If so, is time an element? They might have mentioned it, as I've browsed the web and taken a shite whilst doing it! EDIT: Not time based, and I can now grab a screen of this score if anyone really is that insecure.