adios

Depends who you ask. I use it ironically, but certainly to Trump supporters (yes, yes they are a homogenous group) every (reasonable) person on this site is.

I think it's £80m guaranteed and the surplus is what, £30m?

It's alright, I actually took a further 2 seconds to google and I think found what I was looking for.

http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2013/01/a-comprehensive-list-of-lgbtq-term-definitions/ This seems to be 80% the same thing in different words and the other usual stuff.

Can you link to all the types? I'm too lazy to do more than a couple searches. I think LGBTQ is all fine, as is general gender ambiguity. Interested in the whole breakdown though. I'm hoping it's a small percentage of these guys that are total fruit-loops.

Which should come from current surplus and next year's TV money.

Not to my knowledge, but it's clearly down to brain chemistry, and seems harmless to me. Had no idea there were anywhere close to 50 though.

I see self-financing as a positive, but not if it involves manipulating the strategy of buying players.

A Russia/China emboldened by future American isolationism.

Aye, seems to be the first to say it publicly. I was aware of her, but not that statement. And apparently, it's a thing now. I don't think it's a natural extension at all. People can genetically be LBGTQXYZ, you can't suddenly be black because you feel like it (even if genetically we all are a tiny bit). It's potentially offensive for some white privilege cunt to suddenly think he's a minority and all the shite that goes with that. Transparent kind of touched on that issue with transgender people last season, but I don't think it's remotely the same thing. My apologies for the use of gender-discriminatory language.

It's irrational to look at his track record and assume that history will repeat itself?

That's an acceptable use of the term.

What's your position on the various Social Justice Warrior issues? I'm usually very liberal is support of them, in that I think they do more good than harm and we're going through a period of adjustment (which will settle somewhere in the middle). But today I read a definition of transracial which even I can't support. Basically, it's to identify as a different race to the one you were born as. I can understand people being justifiably very offended by it.

Aye, if it was a mutually exclusive question of him or Ashley, I'd choose the former every time.

This, in particular, is my concern. I honestly thought Charnley's head would roll after the last window, and I worry it's him or Rafa in the summer. He just seems to be completely fucking incompetent.

He did invest under McClaren tbf and I do think you're right logically and he appears to be serious about reinvesting all income back into the club. It's just that Ashley has a record of doing seemingly irrational things. (Twice!) He's at his heart a pathological penny-pincher. He's built his entire empire on it.

I feel like we've been down this road before.

That would be ideal. Can't fucking believe it's over 20 years since he took over there.

I hope he wins it, leaves and they disappear into mid-table obscurity. If it means he stays, I hope they lose 10-0.

Perfect way to describe it. Apparently people get really into it after a couple of episodes.

War is peace.

This is also a fair point.

These are reasonable points and I'm worried about him going too. But knowing whether or not he's going doesn't change the outcome in any positive way. In fact, it could be a negative (have an unsettling effect) .

Birmingham have plenty to play for and a new manager too.