ewerk

It has to be Jim Robinson, it doesn't matter what the actor playing him does, whether it be 24, Lost, The OC or The West Wing he will always known as Jim Daniels. The good thing about female Australian soapstars is how often they get their tits out.

How dare you? Its not just speculation, he's an ITK don't ya know? Best buddies with Danny boy.

I passed first time though I would say I had about 20 lessons but it was with my dad who used to be a driving instructor so I was well prepared and it saved me a fortune. The key to the test is to appear relaxed and at ease, slide the seat back, stick on a few "banging tunes", only use one hand to steer and don't forget to wear a baseball cap angled upwards. Follow that and you'll have no problem passing.

1. Kuyt 2. Ashton 3. Klose 4. Defoe 5. Van Horseface 6.Farfan 7. Bring back Mr. Shearer 8. Sign Sir Les (he did alright in the testimonial) 9. Exhume Jackie's body 10. Stick with Shola and Luque

Fucking stupid, poncy, fairy name. There's no place for his type at SJP.

More than Carr? Yes. The other two positions are being dealt with, I can't see how that affects our urgent need for a top quality centre-back. 167977[/snapback] The other two positions are hopefully being dealt with but after buying a new LB and hopefully two new strikers I can't see us having much left in the coffers to cover Campbell's wages.

Another long term injury to Moore and we're looking at Taylor & Bramble as first choice, which is as bad a parnership as we've had there in recent years. 167827[/snapback] As bad as a long term injury to Carr, Babyaro or dare I say it Ameobi? We've more pressing needs to deal with first.

Because he'd probably be looking upwards of £60k a week and plays in a position where we have sufficient cover?

Another step in the normalisation of illegal drugs.

So is the Godfather going to be on or not?

pernickety to the extreme tbh I mean that there is absolutely no point in spending that much on Marlon Harewood when he will not solve any problem at the club. He is at best Ameobi's equal, this is not good enough. You seem to advocate pointless expenditure, I'd rather we didn't spend anything than waste in on Harewood. If Ashton or Klose are available go for them, if not, then don't waste the cash on a make-weight. what is the point in signing a player who we will be looking to replace in the summer? Harewood is nothing more than an Ameobi-esque forward, neither reliable nor promising. So I fail to see any benefit in the signature. If, however you draw some degree of joy from fruitless purchases then, by all means, lets sign Harewood and all other no marks we can can grab. There's a difference between high priced players that Souness blew wads over and genuinely valuable players. Graeme would have spent double on Duff, and sold Bowyer fer half. 166622[/snapback] I wasn't speaking just about Harewood. The point I'm making is that we're going to have to make a few low profile signings who will be squad players and not necessarily improve our starting XI. I'm not advocating slapping in a £10m bid for Harewood but at the right price he could do a job for us.

missed the point wonderfully there ewerk what is the point of signing Harewood who will score less than Ameobi? Rather than losing a decent player and spending money on some shitehawk who is no better than what we've got, why not sign a player with pedigree (Klose) or promise (Ashton) I don't mean sign a name, I mean sign a talent. Harewood is not a talent and we'd be losign a talented young player in the exchange makes plenty of sense for West Ham, but no sense for us oh an p.s. Owen transformed our team when fit, Emre is decent and we all know how good Dyer can be, when fit. 166576[/snapback] Fucking fantastic idea if we had Abramovich's riches but unfortunately when you have to work under a restricted budget choices have to be made. Yes we can go out and sign the Klose's and Ashton's of the game but what happens if they get injured? We're fucked. We need the not so stellar names who don't attract the big fees to make up the numbers and fill in when necessary. If there is one thing we should've learnt from the Souness period it is not to go and blow the budget on a few high priced players as they can turn out to be either shite or injured. You've said we shouldn't spend the cash on squad players so you think we should just have 11 first teamers and hope they're all available for every game? A very short sighted view if true.

Waaaayy too much time on your hands.

Who needs no-marks when we have the likes of Dyer, Owen and Emre eh?

Ah yes, the old "all the eggs in one basket" approach, thats never let us down before.

Why is the fee for Bridge so low? Is he out of contract soon?

Been banned again from N-O UM?

Of course people deserve praise when they do well but not in a national newspaper and given the horrific nature of their acts I think the author of the article has laid it on too thick, painting them as perfect fucking human beings when they're obviously not given the crime they commited and the fact that they've been locked up ever since.

After hearing what they did I would be sorely tempted.

Should've went with the sack and couple of bricks route. I can't stand cats, they always seem to be violent jealous creatures.

They knew it was wrong so they had the mens rea and so should have had much harsher sentences. I'm not willing to give them another chance just yet, as you say their age has to be taken into account and thats why death perhaps isn't the best option for them. Its this shit article that gets me. In fact I could just quote the whole fucking thing, they are treating these two murderers as heroes who have come through an awful ordeal and should be applauded for what they've done. The article is a mockery and designed to do nothing more than go against the grain.

I'll agree that Thompson's father walking out on him and the sustained sexual abuse he suffered must have fucked him up in some way but to do what they did is incomphrensible and its hard to comment on the motivations for it.

Not all murder deserves the death penalty and I do believe in rehabilition in certain cases. Rikko said that the fact they tried to make it look like an accident shows that they knew it was wrong so they're not evil, to me it shows that they knew it was wrong but did it anyway and so should accept more responsibility for their actions. I would have liked to seen them given life behind bars, proper life with no chance of parole.

Jamie Bulger won't get another chance, in fact he never even got his first chance and neither should these cunts. As I said before this article is very one-sided and not to be taken at face value.