Howmanheyman

He hasn't been alone, even yesterday it happened a few times from different players. I think Howe's mentioned this recently so behind closed doors I hope he's emphasising this even after this win as we've been punished for it and will get punished again if we carry on.

"Oh yesh, yesh, yesh."

The need to highlight it was strange especially on that show. But it's Bruno's and our card nicely marked for any refs watching because Gary's been a bit pissed off about it in the studio watching it live and probably decided that'll go in the show later on. There's actually good moves/shots/chances they don't show because of time restrictions but he has a focus on that?

You see many similar obvious yellows go unpunished when going down in the box, far more than get punished so as gemmill says, strange to highlight it especially as they always say they're up against what they can show because of limited time?

How many times do you see motd, or sky, do a 'coulda, woulda, shoulda' on something like that for something similar in a 4-0 home win for say, Man U or Liverpool? What makes me laugh is it's about ten minutes after his Robertson comment earlier on for as straight forward a red as you'll see.

Gary Lineker thinks it was a strange decision to send last man Andy Robertson off when the Fulham kid would've been clear on goal but reckons Bruno should've been off versus the team he supports for two yellows. Ok, Gary.

Getting back to sky, yesterday I put the Saturday gimp show on to see the other results just as they were interviewing van dick and then the Fulham manager straight after. As I said yesterday, the interviewer and vvd are basically chatting about how resilient Liverpool are and how the kid who scored for Fulham MIGHT have been sent off before he scored? It then pans straight the Silva interview and he won't stop pressing Silva about it who then asks if he wants to talk about the rest of the game? It goes back to the studio where they stick up for the interviewer saying he's got to ask those questions, not the first time I've heard them say that through the years but it's always after they've given someone who isn't a Ferguson, isn't a Wenger, isn't a Klopp etc a bit of a difficult interview, (wemember Woy?) Football loves an underdog but the likes of sky definitely don't like upsetting their main 'talents' who they showcase most weekends.

Sorry Rents, they were a shambles, four nil flattered them but we also played really well, it can be both. That's not being a mackem that's being something mackem's aren't renowned for, it's being balanced and having some perspective. I can only assume either I haven't worded it right originally, (wouldn't be a surprise) or you've took it the wrong way if you assume I'm suggesting we only won as they were shite? Anyway, no harm done, I still love you.

I don't get where you're coming from, Rents? Just mentioning how poor they were because sometimes you notice just how bad a team are. Doesn't take anything away from us.

Great win but they were absolute cacka.

Same cunt would've tiptoed around Klopp though.

Silva losing his rag with the sky/LFCTV interviewer.

Liverpool claiming hard done by and being pounced on by the interviewer.....

U ok hun?

LTA and Dazzler

Liverpool equalise with four minutes to go so they've got at least 9 (nine) minutes to get a winner as back payment for Coote slagging them off.

"Want some?" Man of the match, for me.

FMP

He played for Manchester United apparently?

I'm watching this drinking hot chocolate as Murphy does what he should've done before. 🎵 It started taking the piss 🎶

Isak's body language to the bench before didn't look great.

Just put the cunt on target Murphy FFS.

These are pony.

Dubs playing a blinder so far.

Bruno needs to fuck off with that shit.