AgentAxeman

Rime of the ancient mariner - Iron Maiden

He's got glaucoma. You should get some we should all chip in and get some of those funky glasses for Parky!!

no bother lover!!

eh? Isn't that the Daily Mail line? sorry man, you've lost me........

eh? Edit: just had another read. what is it exactly i'm objecting to? gay people? gay marriage? equality? please tell me as i will need time to formulate my retort! Cheers!!

I'm not really all that surprised. tbh he brought in some proper shit players. even worse than some of NUFC's signings over the last couple of years imo!

International Law? Eh? Irrespective of whether the judgement is correct (I don't know anything about the case other than what it says in the Mail), it's people taking that inflamatory bollocks at face value that beggars belief. The comments are hilarious and scary with equal measure as well. "BNP all the way for me" etc. just because you dont like the the Mail or the BNP that doesnt mean everybody has to agree with you, but the fact is, if he's facing deportation in the 1st place then it must be because he's here ILLEGALLY. come on, think about it. the term 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT' has the word 'ILLEGAL' in it. that means its 'ILLEGAL' for said person to be here. its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary as they are avoiding the issue. Illegal you say? Where have I said everyone has to agree with me btw? The FACT (see I can use capslock too) is the government thought he was here ILLEGALLY but the courts have ruled he has a LEGAL right to stay here. I didn't even say I thought the decision was correct, all I was saying was it's probably not the most balanced view you're getting from the Mail. The funny thing is though that all the people commenting there (many of whom live abroad ironically) are going on about Britain going to the dogs/cats when and saying it wouldn't happen elsewhere when I would say (given the ruling was based on HUMAN RIGHTS) that the judgement was made based on European Law we have signed up to via the Human Rights act. are you saying the government made a mistake signing up to the human rights act? (Joke!) I'm not going to argue about the EU or the human rights act cos quite simply i disagree with both of them (not the motives, just the implementation of both). just seems very strange to me that (Great)?? Britain thought it was illegal for him to stay, yet the Eu courts thought it was ok cos he has a cat (i know there was more). as i said earlier, he's broken the law and got away with it. does this not boil your piss? cos it sure does mine!! oh, and its Caps Lock (2 words). Its only on the button, ffs!! OOoooooOOO HE'S BROKEN THE LAW!!!!

no problem bud, but i still reckon he should have been sent home. he's broken the law and got away with it cos he's got a cat/lass/pots & pans etc........... By this logic does this mean i can rob the local post office?? I've got TWO cats, and a wife, and 2 kids, and lots of pots & pans!! Simples!! Needs to be added to cunt poll. you and me both brother!!

International Law? Eh? Irrespective of whether the judgement is correct (I don't know anything about the case other than what it says in the Mail), it's people taking that inflamatory bollocks at face value that beggars belief. The comments are hilarious and scary with equal measure as well. "BNP all the way for me" etc. just because you dont like the the Mail or the BNP that doesnt mean everybody has to agree with you, but the fact is, if he's facing deportation in the 1st place then it must be because he's here ILLEGALLY. come on, think about it. the term 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT' has the word 'ILLEGAL' in it. that means its 'ILLEGAL' for said person to be here. its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary as they are avoiding the issue. Illegal you say? Where have I said everyone has to agree with me btw? The FACT (see I can use capslock too) is the government thought he was here ILLEGALLY but the courts have ruled he has a LEGAL right to stay here. I didn't even say I thought the decision was correct, all I was saying was it's probably not the most balanced view you're getting from the Mail. The funny thing is though that all the people commenting there (many of whom live abroad ironically) are going on about Britain going to the dogs/cats when and saying it wouldn't happen elsewhere when I would say (given the ruling was based on HUMAN RIGHTS) that the judgement was made based on European Law we have signed up to via the Human Rights act. are you saying the government made a mistake signing up to the human rights act? (Joke!) I'm not going to argue about the EU or the human rights act cos quite simply i disagree with both of them (not the motives, just the implementation of both). just seems very strange to me that (Great)?? Britain thought it was illegal for him to stay, yet the Eu courts thought it was ok cos he has a cat (i know there was more). as i said earlier, he's broken the law and got away with it. does this not boil your piss? cos it sure does mine!! oh, and its Caps Lock (2 words). Its only on the button, ffs!!

well its not really free if its costing you £10 a month!

and i bet you said that with a straight face as well!! Probably not as straight as yours was when you said "its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary" wasnt straight, it had an ironic smirk on it!

no problem bud, but i still reckon he should have been sent home. he's broken the law and got away with it cos he's got a cat/lass/pots & pans etc........... By this logic does this mean i can rob the local post office?? I've got TWO cats, and a wife, and 2 kids, and lots of pots & pans!! Simples!!

and i bet you said that with a straight face as well!!

Sorry JawD, NSFW i thought it would be obvious as its playboy pics

International Law? Eh? Irrespective of whether the judgement is correct (I don't know anything about the case other than what it says in the Mail), it's people taking that inflamatory bollocks at face value that beggars belief. The comments are hilarious and scary with equal measure as well. "BNP all the way for me" etc. just because you dont like the the Mail or the BNP that doesnt mean everybody has to agree with you, but the fact is, if he's facing deportation in the 1st place then it must be because he's here ILLEGALLY. come on, think about it. the term 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT' has the word 'ILLEGAL' in it. that means its 'ILLEGAL' for said person to be here. its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary as they are avoiding the issue.

and that brazillian ref who posed for playboy NSFW http://img161.imagevenue.com/view.php?imag..._123_1126lo.jpg http://img28.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=...2_123_697lo.jpg http://img102.imagevenue.com/view.php?imag..._123_1151lo.jpg http://img142.imagevenue.com/img.php?image...4_123_391lo.jpg http://img149.imagevenue.com/view.php?imag..._123_1163lo.jpg http://img7.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=4...6_123_799lo.jpg http://img46.imagevenue.com/view.php?image...7_123_751lo.jpg http://img153.imagevenue.com/img.php?image..._123_1048lo.jpg http://img187.imagevenue.com/view.php?imag...9_123_374lo.jpg http://img185.imagevenue.com/img.php?image...10_123_74lo.jpg

I dont understand! he's an ILLEGAL immigrant. so fuck if he's got a cat/lass/couple of pots and pans. send the fooka back as its against international law (ie. ILLEGAL) for him to be here! ffs, this country is beyond belief!

4-4-1-1? looks like it. jonas on the left and nolan in the hole. 0-2

Nice one!!! Good to see us at the top of a table! (any table!) Even a Pub table! Cheers everybody!

Meh..............

Little Sally came home from school with a big smile on her face and told her mum, "Frankie Brown showed me his willy today!" Before mum could raise a concern Sally said "It reminded me of a peanut" ........With a secret smile mum asked "Was it really small?" Sally replied "No, just really salty!"

VERY!! (probably) well done Jenson. totally deserving of the title imo!!

Whoops!, dont know how that happened. Corrected now!!

:lol: what about bandanas???