AgentAxeman

The va-va-cunt. bit of a sickener for the Irish tonight! Henry seems to have lost his va va voom mind. cheating bastard!!! i thought Anelka was different class tho. did anyone else hear the van halen track the programme played out to? MINT!!!

FUCKING PRICELESS!!!!! I hope the twat gets the job. imagine the 1st press conference...................

maybe you were expecting too much? dont forget, he's been out of contract for a while now so his fitness levels will be pretty crap. in that case you have to judge players on touch/passing/vision. in those areas i thought he looked pretty good. won quite a few headers against a canny BIG back line as well. Aye, don't get me wrong, I think he'd probably be decent enough as cover and if we sign him on a short-term / end of season type of contract. I just didn't think he did enough, but I maybe/probably was looking for too much, like you say. Oh well, hope he proves me wrong now if we sign him up. tbh, we're short of wingers/wide men and I would say on tonights performance (fitness level aside) he's better than Lovenkrands and Raylor in that position. and he's decent in the air which seems to be the way we're playing this season. as i've said in earlier posts, it can't hurt to get him in till the end of season with the option of keeping him if he's a success.

on a side note, i took the eldest to his 1st ever match at St. James Park tonight. He loved every second of it!!

maybe you were expecting too much? dont forget, he's been out of contract for a while now so his fitness levels will be pretty crap. in that case you have to judge players on touch/passing/vision. in those areas i thought he looked pretty good. won quite a few headers against a canny BIG back line as well.

good lad! would have gone for ball ended ones tho...

metric & imperial i presume?

saw him tonight at the reserve match. looks worth a punt imo! as long as his wage demands arent too high obviously...........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wwilCs4Jqg...feature=related further evidence (if any was needed) that Disco was a bit rubbish really....................

70's Happy, it was the 70's that gave birth to Disco. the 80's gave birth to the New Romantics, Hair Metal and later on in the decade, House!! ACEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!! I was trying to be polite to the 80's and suggest it was good for something. Otherwise it was shite, as your examples show. you think disco was good?? try this one on fer size my friend!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc5d01_riBo...feature=related the worst thing about it is, I thought it was FANTASTIC when i was 6!

Fookin hell, do you not realise that we dont sign players off YouTube??.............. Had on.....................

70's Happy, it was the 70's that gave birth to Disco. the 80's gave birth to the New Romantics, Hair Metal and later on in the decade, House!! ACEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!

my favourite album of the last decade is probably The New Black by Strapping Young Lad. probably not an album on most peoples ipod playlist i'll grant you, but i like it....

i think so, but you'd have an excellent chance of champs league money every year!!

Do toffee apples count as part of your 5 a day? random enough for ya?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8363726.stm The Strokes??? ffs!! mind you, none of those artists/albums are quite my cup of tea.

close 3rd, but only for the 1st season and only because rangers and celtics players know the league. after the initial season tho, i would agree that we would have an excellent chance of winning it.

Hiccy Burpday!!

this

i think that question has been taken out of context as it was rhetorical in nature. it was a reply to the statement "it is not normal government policy to admit to its mistakes" cant remember who the quote was from. Renton i think??

I wasn't, you'd already annswered that. So he can't win. No apology - he's scum. Apology - he's using a situation for political gain. We've apologised to many people and many nations for many misdeeds carried out going back centuries. All while perpetuating further misdeeds, as any moderately powerful nation does from time to time, and will do in future. "So he can't win. No apology - he's scum. Apology - he's using a situation for political gain. We've apologised to many people and many nations for many misdeeds carried out going back centuries." of course he cant win. he's a politician. and i never called him scum. in fact i do believe my answer was probably and not as you would have it definitely! and you're correct. this government has apologised to many peoples and nations for its poor performance in the past and also, the present. in fact almost everyone bar the UK.

Honestly man, they just cant resist!!

they have, it's called expediency!!

I do have an issue with the writer and the paper involved...but I only brought that up in one post. Elsewhere I've stuck to the content of this article. As prime minister he should apologise on behalf of the nation. A government voted in by living British citizens sent other citizens of it's own abroad to be used and abused as an exercise in cutting welfare costs. If you agree an apology is deserved, who should give it, if not the current PM? And where have you seen evidence of anyone whose thinking on Gordo has been changed following this apology? I've not seen one commentator fooled by this so-called 'masking' of other issues. sorry Happy but i think you're deliberatly missing my point. I've said on many previous occasions that the apology is deserved, and i agree with you that as PM Gordo is the man to make it on behalf of the nation. its just that, IMO, i believe he should apologise for his own mistakes 1st. so you admit its really just a masking exercise?? my work is done!! I think my work is done. You've gone from saying the article was "spot on" and he shouldn't apologise for this any more than he should apologise for pulling the wings off an insect when he was wee, to agreeing that an apology is entirely justified from Gordo himself. I don't see the sequence of his apologies as important, given these people have been waiting 22 years for this one. slight fudging of the dialogue there Happy. what i was asking in that instance is where do the apologies stop? i dont think i ever said the apology was unwarranted?? as to saying the apology is justified, fair enough, it is, but again, In my personal opinion, I believe he should own up to his own shortcomings/mistake, whatever you wish to call it, before he has a pop at someone else's. As Alex says. Given that he believes in the policies of his government and doesn't believe an apology is deserved for them. And given that he isn't going to perform a complete policy overhaul 8 months before a general election to satisfy the portion of the electorate that disagree, are you saying he should refuse to apologise for this? Would you congratulate him on his stance then? not quite certain what you're asking here but if i understand correctly, and you're asking me if he should apologise to these kids then the answer is yes. that is not the issue i'm trying to get across here. would i congratulate him on his stance for refusing? quite honestly i don't know. probably not. on the other hand, if it is normal government policy NOT to apologise for its mistakes then why are we apologising for this? and don't say its a different government cos its not. parties and policy change but His/Her Majesty's Government doesnt.