AgentAxeman

pfffffffft, honestly?? (squiggle(whatever the fuck it is))

ooooooooooooooooooh, proper nasty bitchy comments from both sides of the political spectrum. must say, I'm enjoying this discussion............

meh, overall am very happy with a point. albion were extremely dangerous on the break, helped no doubt by the shocking level of running in our centre midfield. dont get me wrong, both smith and nolan worked hard but watching nolan waddle about in centre mid is just a joke. he is imo the best 2nd striker weve got and should be played as such. playing lovenhands as 2nd striker tonight was a bad decision as there was no way he would be able to use his pace to get in behind simply cos of the way teams set up against us at home. thought dorrens was class. for us, imo mom would probably be jonas.

Kia as a company is light years ahead of where they were 10 yrs ago. I'd have no problem with owning one now. In fact, I was looking seriously at a new Ceed SW last year before I ended up with a 3 yr old Mondeo estate (simply because its a larger car). Good cars!

aye, fuckin scientists! they PROMISED i'd be living on the moon, wearing bacofoil trousers and eating all my food in pill form by now. barstewards1!1!

You and your CRAZY!! conspiracy theories!

aye, its from the mail but its still pretty damning tho.

"Claims by the world's leading climate scientists that most of the Himalayan glaciers will vanish within 25 years were last night exposed as nonsense. The alarmist warning appeared two years ago in a highly influential report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. At the time the IPCC insisted that its report contained the latest and most detailed evidence yet of the risks of man-made climate change to the planet. The Himalayas But the experts behind the warning have now admitted their claim was not based on hard science - but a news story that appeared in the magazine New Scientist in the late 1990s. That story was itself based on a telephone conversation with an Indian scientist who has since admitted it was little more than speculation. The revelation is a major blow to the credibility of the IPCC which was set up to provide political leaders with clear, independent advice on climate change. It follows the 'Climategate' email row in which scientists at the University of East Anglia appeared to have manipulated data to strengthen the case for man-made climate change. Dr Benny Peiser, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said: 'The IPCC review process has been shown on numerous occasions to lack transparency and due diligence. 'Its work is controlled by a tightly knit group of individuals who are completely convinced that they are right. As a result, conflicting data and evidence, even if published in peer reviewed journals, are regularly ignored, while exaggerated claims, even if contentious or not peer-reviewed, are often highlighted in IPCC reports. 'Not surprisingly, the IPCC has lost a lot of credibility in recent years. It is also losing the trust of more and more governments who are no longer following its advice - as the Copenhagen summit showed.' The flawed claim appeared in chapter ten of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, which stated: 'Glaciers in the Himalaya are receding faster than in any other part of the world and, if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high if the Earth keeps warming at the current rate.' Rather than being based on a peer-reviewed, published scientific study, the claim was borrowed from a 2005 report by the campaigning green charity WWF. The WWF, in turn, took the claim from a 1999 report in New Scientist. The magazine based its story on a phone interview with Syed Hasnain, a little-known Indian scientist at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi. Dr Hasnain now says the comment was 'pure speculation'. The gaffe is a major embarrassment for the IPCC. Yesterday Prof Murari Lal, who edited the section on glaciers in the IPCC report, told a Sunday newspaper: 'If Hasnain says officially that he never asserted this, or that it is a wrong presumption, than I will recommend-that the assertion about Himalayan glaciers be removed from future IPCC assessments.'" oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.............

of course they are there to defend your way of life, the interests of the UK and its shores. What else do you think they are there to do ? I would not go and live in a country and bomb or demonstrate against their way of life, forces, laws and traditions. End of story. Their "tactics" as you put it, are cowardly and beneath contempt. Who's done that? The London Bombers were born in Leeds and Bradford. bet the parents wern't tho.............. No, but their parents didn't radiicalise them. That was Abdullah el-Faisal....but he was born Trevor William Forest who had evangelical Christian parents and was part of the salvation army until he was 16. These christian churches shouldn't be allowed should they? so he was born to good god fearing parents and the evil, wicked religion which deifies a medievel paedophile warlord corrupted him into becoming a monster? you'll not win many arguments with reasoning like that my friend!! All that handling snakes lark does their heads in apparently. That and the starched white cotton panties. You seem to know all about it Parky! Personal experience perhaps?.............

well at least its better than Jimbo's seriously good cars them. nice one!

of course they are there to defend your way of life, the interests of the UK and its shores. What else do you think they are there to do ? I would not go and live in a country and bomb or demonstrate against their way of life, forces, laws and traditions. End of story. Their "tactics" as you put it, are cowardly and beneath contempt. Who's done that? The London Bombers were born in Leeds and Bradford. bet the parents wern't tho.............. No, but their parents didn't radiicalise them. That was Abdullah el-Faisal....but he was born Trevor William Forest who had evangelical Christian parents and was part of the salvation army until he was 16. These christian churches shouldn't be allowed should they? so he was born to good god fearing parents and the evil, wicked religion which deifies a medievel paedophile warlord corrupted him into becoming a monster? you'll not win many arguments with reasoning like that my friend!!

of course they are there to defend your way of life, the interests of the UK and its shores. What else do you think they are there to do ? I would not go and live in a country and bomb or demonstrate against their way of life, forces, laws and traditions. End of story. Their "tactics" as you put it, are cowardly and beneath contempt. Who's done that? The London Bombers were born in Leeds and Bradford. bet the parents wern't tho..............

loving the alcohol fueled (I'm assuming here) typing there parky!!

we've had our 2 little uns jabbed. no side fx aside from their 2nd head is a bit itchy!! nah, no side fx. kids seem fine.

Got a suggestion of "Exit" of course i said why............. ............he said "so your name is always up in lights!" Cunt!

very topical (and tropical) sorry, am drinking baccardi & coke atm. remnants of the xmas drinks cabinet..

sounds mint, you should do it!

Mainly covers, but maybe 1 or 2 originals. think cover band tho.....

Heavy Rock going into Metal. gonna do pubs/clubs etc...

http://www.bandnamemaker.com/ Cheers Happy, but i've already had a look at that and its a wee bit random. some VERY wierd names came out................

CLASS!! Edit: hope you dont mind but i've posted that as my FB status. this joke needs to be heard man!!!!

as the title suggests. One for all you creative types out there. I'm forming a new band and we're looking for a kickass name. Suggestions people.................................

Seems harsh - "Walking On Sunshine" wasn't that bad...