AgentAxeman

Drawing a crowd = good

Great post, one of the most sensible in this thread.

You could but while a similar principle is being applied it's on a completely different scale, the person inheriting the house isn't (on the whole) already receiving a massive amount of money from the public purse, most people aren't renting their back garden out to the MoD for an exorbitant fee and it's unlikely your Dad only owned the land because one of his ancestors stole it off someone. So I think it's slightly different. Exactly the sort of thing that should be being looked into too imo. He has land, the MOD wish to rent/lease it, so whats the problem? Alex, If you had something of value that someone wanted to rent would you not charge them? Just cos he's rich doesn't mean he should be a charity case. I think Alex is basically saying that he's rich precisely because he's a charity case. In a manner of speaking. aye, you could say that i suppose. but if thats the case then people on any form of benefit are also 'charity cases' as they draw from the public purse. that makes an awful lot of charity cases that should be giving their services for free in this country. Had on, aint that a new tory policy? regardless of where he has recieved his wealth from, he has something that someone else wants so he rents it to them. I really dont see the problem (apart from rampant republicanism )

Completely unbiased and impartial that article like.

You could but while a similar principle is being applied it's on a completely different scale, the person inheriting the house isn't (on the whole) already receiving a massive amount of money from the public purse, most people aren't renting their back garden out to the MoD for an exorbitant fee and it's unlikely your Dad only owned the land because one of his ancestors stole it off someone. So I think it's slightly different. Exactly the sort of thing that should be being looked into too imo. He has land, the MOD wish to rent/lease it, so whats the problem? Alex, If you had something of value that someone wanted to rent would you not charge them? Just cos he's rich doesn't mean he should be a charity case.

Best Wishes to you both!

...........and? if he's the owner of the land then so what.

Hiccy Burpday Fella!

needs a poll. Rocker

politician in 'going back on promises' shocker!!! :o

no.

bugga!

Sorry chaps, but i cant believe anyone would spend even 1p on that tripe. Harrison is fookin SHITE! and has been since the BBC made him a multimillionaire after his olympic win. Haye is a decent boxer, good speed with a fantastic punch. Will be very interesting when he actually fights someone of quality!

for me? yes! completely, totally, utterly! As a 2nd striker/advanced midfielder behind Carroll pushing the wide men up. Hopefully he'll come back as good as he was.

No need to apologise to me. Gervais is barely involved in this though btw. Apart from the original idea, the post production and....... dare i say it............ the script? or have i got the wrong idea about this? nah, he's just not funny (Gervais) in my eyes. I know you like him tho and i was apologising for disagreeing with you. You know how much i hate to do that!!

I 2nd that sentiment! :o :o :o :o

Sorry Happy, but owt with Gervais in (or even involved in) results in an instant 'turn to another channel' for me like.

Good to see you back TR. Glad you're feeling a bit better!

Sweet Jesus. Just................................................... Fucking........................................................ AWESOME!

There's something wrong with you. :o

oooooooooooooh, not looking good for ASM atm!

Yeeeeehah! I'm there!!

Put me down as a possible (need to know the date), even with the dodgy ankle, knee and groin, too old etc. Plus havent played for a year so overweight, out of shape and such but hey, owt for a laugh and all that!