Leaderboard

Fucking hell, I thought I hated the scouse cunts but I now find out I'm an apprentice on his first day compared to the boss that is London Blue. Hats off...

A lot of documents to shred?

Yes, indeed.

Higher stands will also reduce the risks of passing cars getting hit by Longstaff’s efforts.

Fuck you Ashley

And how many of the scousers were complaining when liverpool were drifting in the old second division with no European honours and no obvious future. so i can't stand liverpool and feel like a rant .... In 1970 Liverpool were no more successful than City or Spurs(8 major honours each) and those clubs both had a European major honour but Liverpool did not. Their era of domination began with the Littlewoods money. 1st english team of bought in mercenaries (Scots) Liverpool are a completely manufactured club. Their founder, John Houlding, kicked Everton out of Anfield and therefore had a ground but no team. So he bought a load of players, mainly Scottish ones. He wanted to call them Everton as well but wasn't allowed so he called them Liverpool instead Liverpools beer brewer owner, John Houlding upped the rent of the ground to Everton. Everton had to leave. Houlding had beer to sell and a ground to fill… starts a new club, pays mercenary Scot’s to come south and create team, decides to call team Liverpool. Beer washing, and clearly current day Liverpool fans have forgotten their origins (or the repeat of the 50’s/60’s) Liverpool were given a free stadium. Houlding loaned shed loads of money to LFC and when he died it was due to be repaid to the family. However, the family realised that the club wasn't in a position to pay back the loans and any attempt to force them to do so would result in the bankruptcy of the club and the total loss of the money owed anyway. So they gave the LFC a free pass by writing off the debt. After several decades of not winning much and being relegated, the Moores family pumped sugar daddy money into the club to buy them promotion, a new team and trophies. Blood of 39 Italians on their hands. Liverpool should actually still be banned from the Champions League, they killed but got off with a 5 year ban Hacked a rival club’s computer database Failed UEFA FFP in 2013 but failed to qualify for Europe so fell outside UEFA's remit for investigation and punishment. Would have failed again in 2015 until they magicked out of the air alleged 'stadium development expenses' of £35 million from years before for the non-existent Stanley Park Project that enabled them to offset against FFP losses. Their shirt sponsors are convicted money launderers, aiding criminal organisations and terrorists link The Houthi rebels are responsible for many atrocities in Yemen including blockading food aid at the port of Hodeidah for starving Yemeni civilians. The Houthi rebels are financed and armed by the Iranian government. Standard Chartered have been find a cumulative total of $1.5 billion for repeatedly money laundering for various dodgy organisations but principally for the rogue Iranian government. Liverpool FC's main sponsors are Standard Chartered. The sponsorship started in 2010 and will run until at least 2023 which makes it LFC's second longest ever sponsorship. Liverpool FC, by 2023, will have received £280 million in blood money from Standard Chartered. Ditto their sleeve sponsors. killed a Crystal Palace fan Unprecedented debt and asset stripping, fraudulent sponsorship dealings and accused of breaking FFP rules, unprecedented debt, debt, debt, accused of breaking FFP rules, can’t run the club well enough to be able to sort contracts out for players leaving them potentially jobless. Their owners have been caught cheating at baseball in the US. Liverpool owners forcing local residents out link bricking City coaches whereas City fans impeccably observed their Hillsborough ceremony. hold the record for the longest ban in Europe by an English team Liverpool weren't even the biggest/most successful club in their own city at the start of the 60s, never mind biggest club in England. That was Liverpool before they were "financially doped" with dirty gambling money. Some Manchester City v Liverpool bits .... Citys 10th highest league crowd is 71,364, Liverpools best ever crowd is 61,905. ( City even had 69,463 when in division two against burnley ) City won the FA cup 61 years before Liverpool City won the league cup 12 years before Liverpool City won a cup in Europe 3 years before Liverpool City fans have never murdered any other fans. In 1970 Liverpool were no more successful than City (8 major honours each) and City had a European honour but Liverpool did not. City were the first of the so called big 6 (apologies) to have won all 3 major domestic trophies and a major European trophy. 1970 City 1971 Chelsea, Spurs 1981 Liverpool 1987 Arsenal 1992 United rant over

On the river, where they used to eat the crisps

We now go live to PL headquarters to witness their scrutiny of Man U's fit and proper test:

Just make the pitch narrower. Can't complain about ASM's wasteful wing play if you don't have any wings.

That level of detailed utterly unrepentant bitterness is why you fit in well here

Keep me informed about your decision, because I will go somewhere else.

Howay is going to be fuckin fuming with you lot being reasonable about Maxi this morning. 17,987 transatlantic words of hate and bile incoming imminently. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

They’re not free anymore, mate.

You'd need suits with bladder pouches akin to astronauts' to allow for the pissy CTs of the world.

Tom’s just won Dusty Bin 👍🏻

Someone on Twitter said the NUFC fuss wasn’t about who was taking over but who was being taken over and it’s exactly right. Obviously RTG are over the moon about it Losers.

True faith are putting on coaches from Tyneside taxi firm, Phoenix, the managing director of the firm is........ Two words, first word, two syllables, first syllable rhymes with lore, second syllable rhymes with he. Second word, one syllable, sounds (very) like bhoy.

"Those seats will be taken when Beyonce plays". BBC Magedia boys, taking the piss.

It’ll help FFP though, since you can add back infrastructure and stadium improvements, and as we all know these big building projects tend to go way over on budget.

Why is the football stadium so windy? Because of all the fans.

How convenient for them

I think they knew they’d be really closely scrutinised and how much the PL looks after the interests of the likes of Man Utd and Liverpool tbh

Aye, agree with all of Andrew and KCG’s points too. If fair play was the actual intention of these rules it wouldn’t be fucking tied to individual club P&L over the prior few years and things like that, those metrics literally entrench inequalities which creates a system where clubs then have to either bend rules, or outperform for a number of years to overcome. It’s very purely meant to lock in the clubs that were up there at the time the rules were put into place, those clubs of course got there by having the most money and spending the most money in the years leading up to that ruling. It’s why I find all the incredulous and sensationalist headlines about Man City to be fucking tedious. They’re portrayed as bad guys but then you have Liverpool and Manchester United both with American owners being sponsored for every fucking item of the businesses down to official match day bus tyre sponsor and shite like that, often from American company’s, and we’re all told it’s all above board give over man.

He'll just do another dance for likes on Twitter to cover the pain.

With Miggy looking a bit jaded I would actually try and play ASM on the right wing with Trippier telling him what to do.

As I've said before, the scouse cunts (or at least the ones that know their history) were perfectly happy for one club to have a financial advantage when that club was Liverpool with the Moores' pools money.

Clubs like Liverpool and Forest had a financial advantage over almost all of their rivals in the 70s and 80s too. In fact it’s been going on since the maximum wage was abolished. It’s portrayed now like their achievements were noble and fair. I’m not saying they didn’t achieve great things but it’s not how it’s often painted.

Let’s be clear here, ffp has fuck all to do with fair play and was brought in to protect the then status quo.

3 in 5 square metres there. Is it a landfill site during the week?

As long as they don't speak to NUST about how to allocate all of the new season tickets! Better get myself a membership next season just in case

I've had dreams like this.

Because their ultimate desire is that we don't do as well as we could. They could still be wallowing in League 1, selling their best player to Stoke in January, but as long as we finished 2nd and didn't win a cup, they'd consider their season a success.

Don’t know if this has been posted apologies if it has 🙏🏻

Caulkin went to The Athletic and decided to steal a living by writing, what seems like, one hungover article a month and recording a shit podcast.

Also dumped in generic chat

i'm not sure how you reached that conclusion. i already said a few posts back that he has struggled to adapt to howe's style. but his lack of game time is also because he has struggled for fitness. as far as i can tell, we're disagreeing over the fee we might get for him. he is a player that can be dangerous if a team set up to play to his strengths - as we did under bruce when the whole game plan was pretty much defend deep than get it to maxi. there are plenty of "low block" sides who would play a premium for a player like maxi. whether he has a future with us remains to be seen. if a chunky offer comes in, i think we could let him go. it's also worth remembering that he started the season very well for us. he was being picked every game and didn't lose a match before his injury. he was man of the match against man city and tore kyle walker a new arsehole for most of the game. he also scored a worldie against wolves to secure a draw.

That's something i make a conscious effort with here. Sometimes i write united then delete and go again. I feel something similar when the london describe chelsea as the blues meanwhile Man City fans and Everton fans silently fume.

Bit harsh on LondonBlue.

fat pig

Aye, I definitely think we could get £30m+ for him from a mid table team. We bought him for £20m and in the summer he'll be 2/3 of the way through his contract so has an accounting value of £6.6m. Selling him for £30m would see a profit of £23.7m booked which would actually immediately free up £118m to spend immediately on players on five year contracts. So as the most valuable asset we have that we wouldn't mind losing I think he'll be on the move.

aye, canny read. shame it's written by an absolute whopping cunt who spent 14 years with ashley's cock in his mouth and never held back with his criticism of newcastle's support for daring to dream of at least being mildly competitive against the elite he's now being so critical of he could also have done better by not continuously referring to 'united' and 'city'. something else the media seem to have happily embraced or been hoodwinked in to believing the 2 manchester clubs have exclusivity to. no problem with supporters of either club doing so, smacks of pandering to elitism otherwise.

Good points (for once)

How can he be expected to pay the cost of ensuring his rental properties are up to the minimum habitable standard ( they’re not), if these greedy clubs won’t pay him what he’s owed for fucking them up? Poor bloke, I feel for him.

Abso-fucking-lutely Theres a lot of high brow bullshit being spouted, Barney Ronays latest headline "If Manchester City are guilty they have betrayed football as a spectacle" Settle down eh Barney? These rules are 10 or so years old and were originally intended publicly to stop clubs going into massive, unsustainable debt and privately as KCG says to protect the clubs already making shit loads of money from someone coming up and competing with them. I've never had a problem with the way City or Chelsea before them or Man U or Blackburn or whoever spent money, it always seemed to me like the typical way of football, some rich bloke buys players, except now the rich blokes are the richest blokes, nothings actually changed its just City winning it more often than not now instead of Man U.

I didn't see the game in question but having seen plenty of ASM before, is this really the case? ASMs trick is that he can dribble and work space for himself, he loves to do it in fact, he wants to take everyone on. He also doesn't track back so if he gets his overlapping attacking fullback, the overlap happens, he doesn't pass because hes doing his thing and then loses the ball, we've then got no one defending the left flank. I feel like ASM only works with a Burn behind him. The other option being a genetic freak of a LB who can charge up and down at rapid pace all game and is also a mint defender or setting up the entire team to facilitate ASMs lack of defending in such a way that he simply hasn't earned with end product.

Cleadon robbery: Masked Sunderland duo jailed https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-64561596 You’d think they’d have made them take the masks off for the mugshots, like.