Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/26/20 in all areas
-
5 points
-
5 points
-
This 'cup run', man. Took replays to get past third and fourth division clubs then just scraped past a vastly changed West Brom who were clearly looking at promotion only. First PL team we played we were swept away.5 points
-
I doubt it's the thermostatic valve as they very rarely leak in July. It may well be a burst foo-foo valve? You need to trace the conduit back to the warp core drive to find the breach. Isolate the water supply in the entire street, quoting the water boards rule 62B ( item 8a) to any disgruntled neighbors. Then replace the damaged donut washer with a new one, remembering to only put 8 ft/lb of torque on the sproggle socket. No need to thank me, just send me the £453 plus £625 for parts = £2450.09 (- 10% discount included)4 points
-
As I’ve said before, if we’re the horse punchers, they’re the shit on your seat, racist, paedo worshippers4 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
If Charnley is still employed, he'd probably sign this Messi by mistake.3 points
-
3 points
-
Aye but the ambition is Top 10.… on a regular basis. Fuck me, stop it Brucie, I can only get so hard.2 points
-
Fucking how we have fallen eh, happy to have 7 teams below us. Fuck off.2 points
-
2 points
-
I just thought you hadn’t posted in a while....probably too busy building a shrine to your buck-toothed yet strangely attractive leader... .2 points
-
2 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
“Mike your on mute” “top left mate....” ”click...” *Mike closes laptop*1 point
-
Bruce after the game "We've taken the lead against them twice this season and it gives you something to hold onto. For large parts of the first-half we defended very well. We had a hunger and a desire I couldn't fault but in the end we just weren't quite good enough." No shit Sherlock. Shame about small parts of the first half & all the second half really1 point
-
Bet it takes a river of lube to even get into the old Tory bitch. Avoid.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Nay celebrations on wearside then as their cabbage heeded champion didn’t better that “fat Spanish waiter” bloke. Ouch.1 point
-
I actually managed to wire the thing by myself. I know most adults should probably be capable of this but I’m happy with myself. Got some strings coming this afternoon, so I’ll give it a whirl. Also, as predicted the neck isn’t a fender given that the serial number is a Jazz bass. Still £30 for the lot1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Well if he was going to be found anywhere then of course it was the Guardian comments section.1 point
-
Aww now that's not true at all. Well, the second bit isn't anyway. New Zealand is fucking brilliant though.1 point
-
1 point
-
I’d say it’s a weird thing for him to bring up seeing as they’re definitely worse on that front, but the bloke is clearly a complete moron.1 point
-
What has Ashley got to do with them being taken over like? I know it’s true but they’re dangerously obsessed.1 point
-
Our expectations were so high after him we welcomed Roeder as his replacement with open arms.1 point
-
Don’t think I’ll bother, cheers Wolfy II Jerry Falwell had a large part in its production, so it’s not exactly “balanced” “The video was characterized by The Washington Post as a "bizarre and unsubstantiated documentary."[2] The New York Times reported that it was a poorly documented "hodgepodge of sometimes-crazed charges."[3] The producers were criticized after it came to light that a number of the people in the documentary had been paid to appear. The director admitted the payments but denied he had instructed any paid participants to say anything that was false.[1] The movie helped perpetuate a conspiracy theory known as the "Clinton Body Count" about a list of associates Clinton was purported to have had killed. The Los Angeles Timesreported that Larry Nichols, who appears throughout the film and is the primary source for a number of the murder and mysterious death claims, was fired from his Arkansas state government job and once admitted to an Associated Press reporter to being motivated by spite.[4] The fact checking site TruthOrFiction.com states that "There is no credible evidence that any of the deaths is related or can be attributed to Bill Clinton".[5] To promote the film, Falwell aired an interview with Matrisciana, who was silhouetted to conceal his identity as he pretended to be a journalist who was afraid for his life.[1]Matrisciana later acknowledged that he was not in any danger, but that the interview was staged for dramatic effect at Falwell's suggestion.[1]” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Clinton_Chronicles1 point