Yeah, the thing is that I have been reading the report, maybe you should too. Let me add some parts of the report you selectively chose to leave out.
“Lower-skilled UK-born workers are more likely to lose out.”
Taking all the new evidence into account we found that migrants have no or little impact on the overall employment and unemployment outcomes of the UKborn workforce. The impact may vary across different UK-born groups with more negative effects for the lower-skilled and more positive effects for the higher-skilled. However, our robustness checks suggest that these findings are subject to uncertainty.
“There is evidence that lower-skilled workers face a negative impact”.
We found some evidence suggesting that lower-skilled workers face a negative impact while higher-skilled workers benefit, however the magnitude of the impacts are generally small.
“The earnings of the self-employed are lower and the gap is larger now than in the past”.
We do not conclude what, if any, impact immigration has had on the economic prospects of the self-employed
The report also recommends and end to free movement “With free movement there can be no guarantee that migration is in the interests of UK residents”.
This does not mean that free movement is guaranteed to cause problems
“The share of new tenancies going to migrants is rising. Given there is little building of new social housing this is inevitably at the expense of other potential tenants”.
Migrants are a small fraction of people in social housing but a rising fraction of new tenants.