Leaderboard

They fucking detest Dawn Thewlis. Her dad played for Newcastle reserves (and played cricket for Northumberland). And, as far as I can tell, that’s it

I've heard all the restaurants around the lakes are shit and you'll all better off taking asdas frozen meals to heat up in the microwave. There is one 'pop-up' van that goes around that sells gourmet burgers in artisan buns called 'Genes protein' but unfortunately the only sauce he uses is his cum.

At least he's polite I suppose

Sounds like the sort of thing a paedo would say.

FTMd your post.

That is THE destination in Sunderland to get your chicken dippers.

Still, at least they’re not pathetic enough to plaster it on their business signage… … oh, hang on, of course they are ( can you imagine how fucking rank the meat from there must be? )

When syphilis just isn’t enough

The worst bit is that’ll be a grown bloke. Ending a sentence with “FTM” is beyond pathetic.

@TheGingerQuiff regularly gets beaten up by girls so you'll want to look elsewhere for that service.

Aye, Grange and Borrowdale as a whole are reliably lovely.

Cafe Italia is nice

Aye it was the same with the Mayweather fight. Nonsense odds on him to win when he was blatantly going to. I'm the same though. Would never have the balls to lash a load on. Tennis trading is a good one particularly in the women's game. One tried and tested tactic is to lay the favourite when they go a break up or a set up. Again, the market massively overreacts and the women exchange breaks of serve so often that they'll usually get broken back and their price will swing right back out. The beauty of this is that you can lay at ludicrously short odds on prices - so you can stick 100 quid lay on and your liability will only be £15. So your exposure is really small compared to the upside. Worst comes to worst, if they go on to cement their break you can trade out for a small loss. There's YouTube videos on it - I saw a lad lay £1000 at 1.03 once. £30 liability and the lass he laid fell apart not long after.

Aye it's just the trade out button. If you look at the price of the draw before the match starts, usually it just looks wrong when you compare it with how often a draw actually happens. But the exchange markets often overreact to a good opening partnership and the price of the draw will come in even more. You don't even have to wait for a good partnership if you don't want to. If you lay the draw pre match and there's a few early wickets you're quids in anyway. But waiting a bit allows you to take advantage of the market overreacting. Basically buy low, sell high is the same rule as lay low, back high. From memory, I think the golden figure was 3.5 which was generally considered a good price to lay at. If I could zoom in to the graph you could see how much it swings out when there's a couple of wickets, but aye you basically just use the trade out button when you're happy with the profit figure Obviously you wouldn't try it in a match where there was bad weather forecast.

You can make decent money in cricket from laying the draw at the exchange. Especially if there's a half decent first wicket stand. The price on the draw comes in massively, you lay it, and then just wait for a handful of wickets to fall, at which point you can get out for a profit.

I mean, ffs.

As I said last week, when is the last time he did a wide ranging interview? He appeared on Marr and Peston in January and Marr again in June. For a man with all the answers and a victim of a vicious smear campaign his team seem very keen for him to avoid any real scrutiny.

Oof. Click for short thread.

You should be shot just for using "progressive values".

The fuck? I'm not desperate to prove anything. The numbers are fucking clearly stacked against men on this. I'm just pointing out that she's a hypocrite and a "pig". I also do feel that in a society where gender roles are being eliminated by progressive values, that young men should be considered as vulnerable as young women, at least in the eyes of the people pushing that line of thought. You really have the wrong idea about me mate. It's kind of annoying tbh. My issue is with narratives and bullshit. I will happily fight the corner of any group with the statistical backing of data and research to support the underlying point about the issue. I posted this because it's a kick in the balls for a prevailing narrative, not because i feel like it makes the world an equal place as far as sexual assaults go. Because I'm not wedded to any particular line of ideological nonsense, i feel relatively free to do this.

$380,000 is a weird payoff, mind. You’d expect to be dealing in increments of $50k, would you not? Was the $20k taken off because he jizzed on her hair or something? Also, whatever your view on this, it shouldn’t deflect any attention whatsoever from the fact Weinstein is a vile cunt of the worst kind.